Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why hasn't the WTC site been rebuilt yet?
Vanity | March 12, 2006 | seacapn

Posted on 03/12/2006 4:07:16 AM PST by seacapn

This may have been asked before, but it's becoming more of an issue as time goes on - I was recently in Manhattan, and though I hadn't thought about it in a while, the former WTC site is still a gaping hole. Nothing has been rebuilt. Now, almost five years after the attack, that is getting kind of inexcusable. What, exactly, is holding up reconstruction? Is there not enough demand for office space? Too many "me-too!" groups demanding a say in the project? What, exactly, is hamstringing the reconstruction? As each year passess, it is becoming a bigger and bigger issue.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Society
KEYWORDS: freedomtowers; manhattan; rebuilding; worldtradecenter; wtcmemorial

1 posted on 03/12/2006 4:07:20 AM PST by seacapn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: seacapn

There's no demand at all for more office space down there, but ultimately why this hasn't gotten started is because three levels of government have their grimy paws all over it.


2 posted on 03/12/2006 4:13:16 AM PST by thoughtomator (Nobody would have cared if the UAE wanted to buy Macy's...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
There was a lawsuit recently filed by some families of people who died on 9-11. They are opposed to the current plans because those plans seek to cement over the spot where their loved ones are buried in the ground.

In response, the city says this new lawsuit will not hold up plans to build at the site -- and construction is starting on Monday. (I was recently in NY, too.) This is the latest news I read about it.
3 posted on 03/12/2006 4:14:04 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

As far as I can tell, internal city and state politics have hamstrung efforts to do anything with the site.

The only coalition that really had a chance to do anything were going to make a decidedly anti-Bush and pro-Islamist statement with a memorial at the center. That one was killed by grass-roots protest at the last moment. Personally, I think the city should just give up and make the site into a park with a very limited memorial.

As far as I know, there is no shortage of office space in NYC. Even the WTC towers never came anywhere near capacity occupation.


4 posted on 03/12/2006 4:17:26 AM PST by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: seacapn

Basically to me,

The City and State can not please all the family members. The family members have too much power and emotional support.

Also this is Liberal Land.
Frankly I have given up on thinking about it all. Its a truly pathetic situation and will probably never be resolved.


6 posted on 03/12/2006 4:45:12 AM PST by alisasny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

Aside from the other issues mentioned, IIRC, the towers had a lot of vacant space.


7 posted on 03/12/2006 6:12:00 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

Why build anything in a city that is inevitably going to the stratosphere in a mushroom cloud.


8 posted on 03/12/2006 8:45:09 AM PST by mmercier (can't get back from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

Its a burial ground. Why would you build anything besides a memorial upon it?


9 posted on 03/12/2006 8:47:15 AM PST by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
"As each year passess, it is becoming a bigger and bigger issue."

Not to me.

10 posted on 03/12/2006 8:47:19 AM PST by verity (The MSM is comprised of useless eaters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
There was a lawsuit recently filed by some families of people who died on 9-11. They are opposed to the current plans because those plans seek to cement over the spot where their loved ones are buried in the ground.

That site was pretty well scraped-down to clean earth - if there's any dust from their relatives left it can't amount to as much as floated-away in the wind or what was smeared-in with the rubble that was trucked away.

IMO, at this point they're only in it for the notoriety as a substitute for the little that's being done to actually avenge their relatives.

11 posted on 03/12/2006 8:58:12 AM PST by solitas (So what if I support an OS that has fewer flaws than yours? 'Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.4.2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

You should have seen how long it took them to build it originally, how much debate and disagreement there was. And it was all pretty straightforward at that time. It's how NY is, nothing is easy there, everything is fraught with conflict and disagreement. Somehow, eventually, something gets done, built, whatever. There is no use worrying about it or trying to hurry things along.


12 posted on 03/12/2006 9:09:16 AM PST by jocon307 (The Silent Majority - silent no longer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marajade

"Its a burial ground. Why would you build anything besides a memorial upon it?"

My thoughts exactly!



13 posted on 03/12/2006 12:20:40 PM PST by Majie Purple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: summer
There was a lawsuit recently filed by some families of people who died on 9-11. They are opposed to the current plans because those plans seek to cement over the spot where their loved ones are buried in the ground.

Wouldn't be a new york skyscraper unless a few bodies were encased in the cement foundation now would it ?
14 posted on 03/12/2006 3:38:14 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Purple Mountains Maj
Shortly after 9/11, some proposed making it a group of buildings AND a statement against terrorists:

15 posted on 03/12/2006 5:12:59 PM PST by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mmercier
Why build anything in a city that is inevitably going to the stratosphere in a mushroom cloud.

LOL! Are you a Nostradamus fan, or just a crank? ;)

16 posted on 03/12/2006 5:15:40 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
Why hasn't it been built yet?

Because no one will want their office sitting on the grave site of nearly 3,000 people. I think it is safe to say that there will not be any Chinese companies looking for space in the new building.

17 posted on 03/12/2006 5:16:35 PM PST by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

Ahhh I see the shape...know what it means...That would work too!


18 posted on 03/12/2006 5:34:35 PM PST by Majie Purple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Are you a Nostradamus fan, or just a crank?

A crank.

19 posted on 03/12/2006 5:47:48 PM PST by mmercier (so it goes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves; mmercier

I don't see that that is so far fetched, either.
If there's no demand or need for the office space, I can't see wasting the time and raw materials just to build another target.


20 posted on 03/13/2006 6:57:41 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson