The Official Death of the Theory of Evolution – 2/25/2006

PowerBASIC Forums ^ | 2/25/2006 | SDurham

[ibme]

The Official Death of the Theory of Evolution – 2/25/2006

Theorem Name: The Illusion of Evolution DOA Theorem
Theorem: There are not enough reproductive life cycle generations available in the projected age of the Universe to allow even the most basic form of evolution.

Note: This Theorem looks at the Theory of Evolution from a completely abstract point of view. The formulas and discussion are presented from an Evolutionist point of view. This doesn’t necessarily represent the view of the author.

AoU – age of the Universe. (1)
AvRpdCyc - average reproductive life cycle generation (2)(3)
TotalRpdCyc – total reproductive cycles in the age of the Universe.

AoU = 10 billion = 10,000,000,000 years
AvRpdCyc = 100 per year (2)(3)
TotalRpdCyc = AoU * AvRpdCyc = 1,000,000,000,000 = 1 Trillion

In the whole age of the Universe, there are only about 1 Trillion opportunities for something to evolve to a different state – eventually Man. (this is very generous)(3)

MM - Mega Millions Jackpot Odds
MM = 175,711,536
TotalRpdCyc / MM = 1,000,000,000,000/175,711,536 = 5,691

In order to believe the Theory of Evolution, you have to believe the odds of going from Rock to Man are only 5,691 times greater than winning the Mega Millions Jackpot.

• This doesn’t take into consideration; no one has ever seen a rock do it.
• This doesn’t take into account; the Human Body consists of 10 Trillion individual cells.
• We haven’t considered the complexity of the Human Body.
• We haven’t considered the complexity of reproduction.
• We haven’t considered a distribution curve.
• We haven’t considered any deviation. (On odds of 1/Trillion there would have to be a massive deviation.) (4)
• We haven’t considered other forms of life.
• We haven’t taken into consideration that it’s a lot easier to pick lottery balls than produce a live entity able to reproduce itself.

1. Some say 20 billion years – based on scientific estimation.
2. I’m using 100 average reproductive cycles per year.
   I’m taking into consideration that the Theory of Evolution is based on things moving from simple states to more complex. Some cells reproduce quickly. Mankind would be around 12 years at the best. (3)
3. This is overly fair. Evolution has been intently studied for over 100 years and there is no evidence of anything evolving in the last 100 years.
4. Check the Mega Millions statistics for reference.

Note: If something is wrong with the math, please show me. The numbers are not presumed to be absolutely correct. You can play with the numbers. Throw in a few million here and there. No matter what numbers you consider, there aren’t enough reproductive life cycles in the projected age of the Universe to produce the simplest form of life.

[LiteKeeper]

YEC SPOTREP

[zarf]

I've got the popcorn. Let's go kids.

[Wycowboy]

Hope you've got your asbestos suit on and zipped up.

[LoneRangerMassachusetts]

I wonder how the evolution verses creation argument goes in Allah land. Will some Muslim please step up and speak. I need a change in the argument to keep me interested.

[Donald Rumsfeld Fan]

QED

[Tribune7]

ping

[festus]

PowerBASIC...............

Hmm.....

Visual RPG
Object Oriented Cobol
Point-n-Click Assembler
Non-recursive LISP.

[Phil Connors]

Let's see. Either thousands of scientists are wrong, or thousands of Biblical inerrantists (or should that be irritants?).

NOMEX suit zipped!

[Wycowboy]

Yeah, well what about the punctuated quantums?? Huh?

[js1138]

There would be no change in the argument. Muslims do not allow evolution to be taught.

[festus]

NOMEX suit ?

Leave the mexicans out of this we've got enough conflict on this thread already without you going and trying to make it racist ;-)

[mountn man]

Either thousands of scientists are wrong, or thousands of Biblical inerrantists

Your statement would make the assumption that ALL scientists are on the side of TTOE. Which would be wrong. There is a huge group of equally credible scientists who oppose TTOE.

[Ostlandr]

As Mark Twain wrote, "There are three kinds of untruths; white lies, damnable falsehoods, and statistics."

What about the Peppered Moth? This species rapidly changed it's coloration "when coal was King" and then changed back once it's environment wasn't colored by coal soot. The changes only took a few generations, as those moths that didn't adapt were poorly camouflaged and easy targets for predators.

Also note the change in the Eastern Coyote since the elimination of wolves. The Eastern Coyote is rapidly gaining size and strength in order to prey on abundant white-tailed deer- in effect, changing into wolf analogues. This has happened in roughly a hundred years. Scientists have actually documented the genetic changes in these animals- they are different from both dogs/wolves and other Coyotes. Some are suggesting that these animals may well become a new, separate species of canine.

While the posted article may well prove mathematically that evolution cannot occur, practical observation indicates that it is still operating today.

I tend to believe that God planned out his Creation in advance, then spoke a single word and it all unfolded according to his plan. (Yes, I think this took more than seven days.)

[Phil Connors]

Your statement would make the assumption that ALL scientists are on the side of TTOE. Which would be wrong. There is a huge group of equally credible scientists who oppose TTOE.>>

No they aren't credible. The fact that they oppose reality doesn't make them the least bit credible.

"God made man, and He used the monkey to do it." - St. Devo

[Phil Connors]

I tend to believe that God planned out his Creation in advance, then spoke a single word and it all unfolded according to his plan. (Yes, I think this took more than seven days.)>>>

Or maybe He just clicked "Execute"?

[Phil Connors]

What about the Peppered Moth? This species rapidly changed it's coloration "when coal was King" and then changed back once it's environment wasn't colored by coal soot. The changes only took a few generations, as those moths that didn't adapt were poorly camouflaged and easy targets for predators. >>>

Now to be fair, the Peppered Moth study was found to be bogus years ago. Doesn't mean that evolution is false, tho, it just means that the study was fatally flawed.

[babygene]

Bump

[Oztrich Boy]

VG. Now prove that it is mathematically impossible for the to fly.

[Oztrich Boy]

But think. In years to come, when people ask "Do you remember what you were doing when you heard Evolution died?" - you will have an answer.