Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to Get Condi to Power
TCS Daily ^ | 2/17/06 | Uriah Kriegel

Posted on 02/17/2006 6:34:15 AM PST by Valin

The "Draft Condi" movement is picking up pace. A Condoleezza Rice 2008 candidacy appeals to an array of varied but complementary components in the Republican coalition -- and for good reason. But the "Condistas" have failed to realize the tremendous obstacles in the way of a potential Condi candidacy.

Rice's Appeal

The notion of a Rice presidency is appealing to three different groups within the GOP. First and foremost is the moderate wing of the party. Secretary Rice combines an unwavering hawkish foreign policy with socially moderate positions on abortion, race relations, etc. She is a deeply religious person who is nonetheless not, politically speaking, guided by religion. And as such, she appeals to Republicans worried about the rise of Evangelicals evident during the Bush presidency.

Obviously, Rice not only represents, but also embodies, the socially inclusive element in the Party of Lincoln. This element has been growing steadily over the past two decades, and now accounts for a large chunk of the Republican block. But Democrats have somehow managed to lock public opinion onto a dated caricature of the GOP as the party of rich white men whose only agenda is the survival of rich white men's hegemony. This caricature would be punctured once and for all by the candidacy of a black woman of humble Alabaman origins.

This is also part of her appeal to a second Republican group -- the libertarian/meritocratic wing headed by anti-regulation, small-government Republicans and associated Big Business interests. Despite the challenges presented by her racial and socioeconomic background, Rice ascended to her current stature on the merit of her intellectual and moral character. Moreover, the aura of incompetence that surrounds the Bush Administration -- in the wake of its preparation for Iraqi reconstruction, its evident mishandling of the Katrina disaster, as well as the huge fiscal deficits -- has somehow spared Secretary Rice, who still enjoys an image of a brilliant, focused and competent individual who gets the job done.

The virtues of Rice's competent and meritocratic image will be an immense political asset in 2008. They will acquire extra significance if the Democrats field Hillary Clinton as their candidate. The difference between a privileged white woman who owes her political career to her husband and a black woman who earned every bit of her success will be particularly stark.

This also ties to the third group Rice appeals to, the "Emerging Majority" Republicans and the pragmatically-oriented apparatchiks and wonks in conservative think-tanks throughout the country. This wing may value Rice's moderation (and competence) not only for its own sake, but also for its political potential. After all, if the GOP succeeded in locking in a two-term candidate in 2008, it will have ruled with only one interruption (Clinton) for 36 years from 1980 to 2016. This would give the GOP the status of a default choice for government in a way that would force the Democrats to move rightwards in order to remain in contention. In the long run, there is no better prospect for the conservative movement.

In a compelling National Journal analysis, Jonathan Rauch recently showed that Bush's falling approval numbers represent massive disillusionment by independents with Republican government. If he's right, the prospects of an "emerging Republican majority" may be in jeopardy. This dynamic makes a moderate Republican like Rice attractive not only to moderates but also to conservatives concerned with the creation of a permanent Republican majority.

The Obstacles

A Rice candidacy faces some outstanding difficulties, however -- ones that are systematically underestimated by Condistas. First of all, successful presidential candidates who have never been previously elected to office are extremely rare in American history, and tend to be retired generals (e.g. Eisenhower).

Second, Rice has been able to sustain her unblemished integrity precisely because she has never run for office. As long as she speaks in favor of freedom and democracy, she is bound to look dignified; once she speaks in favor of herself, sustaining the image of integrity would require some political skill we simply don't know whether she has.

Third, personal facts about Secretary Rice are likely to present a challenge to her candidacy. Rice is a strong and independent single woman in her fifties who has never been married. Marriage, with its connotations of tradition and family values, tends to be a sine qua non of a presidential candidacy. Sadly, the probability of a disrespectful whispering campaign about Rice's sexual orientation during the primaries -- in an attempt to rob from her early pivotal contests such as South Carolina -- must be taken into consideration by anyone serious about a Rice candidacy.

More generally, the entire "Draft Condi" movement often comes across as an idealistic, almost messianic, movement with no serious practical bearings or political maturity. The very term "Condistas" reflects a revolutionary and purist zeal that is quite charming in the drafting stages but doesn't work all that well come election time (Note: Howard Dean). If a Rice candidacy is to develop the requisite maturity, the mentioned outstanding difficulties must be contended with and a practical path to the White House must be charted.

The Condistas' best and wisest bet would be to get Rice on the 2008 ticket as vice-presidential candidate, preferably coupled with another socially moderate but unquestionably hawkish candidate, such as Giuliani or McCain. This would allow Rice to neutralize her first two problems -- by holding her first elected office and chaffing her elbows in her first political campaign -- and hope that the third obstacle would be overridden by the gravitas of incumbency.

Uriah Kriegel teaches philosophy at the Universities of Arizona and Sydney.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: condi; condoleezzarice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 02/17/2006 6:34:16 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Valin

DRAFT PENCE!


2 posted on 02/17/2006 6:36:02 AM PST by theworkersarefew (pence08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Secretary Rice combines an unwavering hawkish foreign policy with socially moderate positions on abortion, race relations, etc.

So, I gather that the "socially moderate" view on infanticide is that it's OK.

But what is the "socially moderate" view on race relations? And what is the "socially conservative" view purported to be?

3 posted on 02/17/2006 6:37:02 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Does anyone know her stance on issues like the environment, student loans, affordable housing, the middle class, taxes, abortion, the military, energy and social spending?


4 posted on 02/17/2006 6:38:49 AM PST by Idisarthur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

"I take all my moderation in moderation"- Ronald Reagan


5 posted on 02/17/2006 6:39:02 AM PST by Gipper08 (Mike Pence in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gipper08

If only they hadn't dropped Ronnie, Jr. on his head, maybe we'd have a good candidate by now.


6 posted on 02/17/2006 6:41:18 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Valin
I do not think Rice is a moderate. Moderates are people who have NO ideal of what to do and want someone else to be the leader. I will never vote for a moderate!

Moderates are not leaders they are followers of whatever or whomever controls the leadership.
7 posted on 02/17/2006 6:42:02 AM PST by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

I doubt this will happen.


8 posted on 02/17/2006 6:42:58 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin; All

I have no problem if Condi wants to run (I will vote for her if she does). But how many times does she have to say NO before these people get it into their thick heads?


9 posted on 02/17/2006 6:44:47 AM PST by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Idisarthur

As far as I know she's not not talked about these things.
She may very well have, but I've not seen it.
If you find anything could you let me know....thanks



There is one other small problem that is not mentioned in this article....she's said over and over and over that she's not interested.


10 posted on 02/17/2006 6:45:57 AM PST by Valin (Purple Fingers Rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

But how many times does she have to say NO before these people get it into their thick heads?

42 :-)


11 posted on 02/17/2006 6:46:42 AM PST by Valin (Purple Fingers Rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Idisarthur
I really do not think ANYONE does.That is why conservatives should be very cautious.
12 posted on 02/17/2006 6:47:02 AM PST by Gipper08 (Mike Pence in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Condi Rice says she's not running. She has said it again and again. Why put energy into a false hope.

Besides, it would be hard as heck to consider Rice a conservative. She is not.

This isn't going to happen. Better to find a good, strong, conservative candidate with good personal appeal qualities.


13 posted on 02/17/2006 6:47:23 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Idisarthur
Does anyone know her stance on issues like the environment, student loans, affordable housing, the middle class, taxes, abortion, the military, energy and social spending?

Her economic viewpoints are unknown to the public, ditto energy issues. She seems to believe in the right to bear arms. Her position on abortion is ambiguous, which translates as pro-abort. She's shown remarkable incompetence in dealing with the Middle East, especially as it pertains to Israel and her avowed enemies.
But she at times projects what a lot of Freepers call the "Condi stare". So I guess she should be our next President.

14 posted on 02/17/2006 6:47:37 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

I would vote for her. {Twice}

15 posted on 02/17/2006 6:47:39 AM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: YOUGOTIT

I think moderates are cursed with the ability to see more than one side of an issue, and it just appears, that they are followers and do not have a position. Besides, if you don't have a middle, how can you have a left or a right?


16 posted on 02/17/2006 6:48:28 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Valin

We might be better off worrying about what happens in 2006 instead of what might be happening in 2008.


17 posted on 02/17/2006 6:48:32 AM PST by claudiustg (Delenda est Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla

Plus, she takes orders very well...


18 posted on 02/17/2006 6:49:47 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Valin
The worst thing the GOP could do is run Condi for President against Hitlery.

The people who don't want a woman president would just stay home, who would otherwise vote against Hillary.

Black people won't vote for Condi just because she is black anymore than conservatives voted for John Kerry because he was a war hero, to assume otherwise is to insult the black community. If anything a Condi run could turn out the black community in greater numbers than ever to defeat what they would see as an uncle tom candidate.

Plus Condi is a baby killer, and if I remember right gun grabber, which would force the entire republican base to stay home, ensuring a socialist democratic win.
19 posted on 02/17/2006 6:51:23 AM PST by conservative physics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Maybe if Condi wants to get to power, she has to do it herself!!!


20 posted on 02/17/2006 6:53:47 AM PST by tkathy (Ban the headscarf (http://bloodlesslinchpinsofislamicterrorism.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson