Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Political Correctness
Of Interest Blog ^ | January 18, 2006 | College Student

Posted on 02/07/2006 12:33:31 AM PST by LivinLovinLife

We live in a world today where our every day lives are dictated by political correctness. People-on the job, at school, on the streets, and sometimes even in their own home-have to be concerned with every word they say; it could be misconstrued by someone as being offensive or discriminatory. When typing an email at work, it is necessary to meticulously review it for its content. If this isn't done, one risks the chance of corrective action by their employers, termination or possibly a lawsuit for discrimination. In fact, I am certain that some of you reading this will find its content offensive, merely because I am presumptuous enough to question the subject.

It is a requirement of today's society for one to be politically correct in their words and actions. This has become a difficult task as the standards of political correctness have become more complex. Words which were considered to be correct only a few years ago are now considered to be unacceptable. It was only eight years ago that Time magazine featured Ellen DeGeneres with the unforgettable line, "Yep, I'm Gay!" across the cover. Now the word gay relates strictly to men. Using it to describe a lesbian is considered improper. Since lesbians are their own distinct community, it is important to designate that, of course. Homosexual is another term that is now politically incorrect. People feel it surrounds the idea of sex, rather than a relationship, and is thought of as a negative stereotype (Norvell). Retarded was once just a factual term to describe someone we recently would refer to as mentally handicapped. However, "mentally handicapped" and "the disabled" have recently been deemed distasteful and are now to be replaced with "learning disabilities" or "people with disabilities" (Norvell, 2). Why is it that the connotations of these words change so often? How is it that calling a woman gay is an insult when just a few years back a woman would proudly say she was gay?

The terminology in regards to race and ethnicity has always been puzzling to me. Every February, America celebrates Black History Month. But wait. I though it was politically incorrect to use the word black to describe someone? We now need to say, "African-American." Most every school has a Black Student Union, but use the word black in school and you will quickly be corrected. If African-American is used, why wouldn't a person of Chinese descent but born in America be referred to as Chinese-American? Or if someone's parents were from England, could they not be an English-American? If one has "white" skin, regardless of what country their family was from, a person is simply "Caucasian" when filling out any type of paperwork.

Here in New Mexico around 40% of the population is Hispanic. A fairly common decoration for cars is writing, typically in old English lettering, on the back window stating "Brown Pride." Not Mexican pride or Hispanic pride, but brown pride. Or a popular term is to be "down with the brown." I am a Caucasian female in college, and can only imagine the reaction if I called someone who is Hispanic, "brown." I would most certainly be confronted. Or dare I even suggest we reverse the situation. Imagine if I were to drive my car around the city with lettering on the back window reading "White Pride." The public reaction would be fierce. I would expect to have people screaming at me on every street corner, calling me a racist, a white supremacist, a Nazi. I would have to fear being physically hurt, or worse. So, is it politically correct to use the terms black, brown, and white or not? Apparently the answer depends on who is saying it, whom it is being said to, and of course, it depends on the situation.

A local restaurant chain uses the slogan "Help stamp out gringo food," which is displayed on their shirts and throughout the store. Customers can even buy all types of memorabilia sporting the slogan. Almost any Mexican restaurant has a dish on the menu called the "gringo breakfast." According to Dictionary.com, gringo is defined as "a Latin American (disparaging) term for foreigners (especially Americans and Englishmen)" (Lexico Publishing Group). Wouldn't this, then, be considered politically incorrect? This place of business is allowed to advertise using this slogan without concern or reprimand by society and the government.

It is probably necessary for me to disclose that the next few sentences contain words that are considered to be extremely racially offensive. Therefore, read further at your own discretion. Dictionary.com states that spic is "used as a disparaging term for a Hispanic person," and nigger is "used as a disparaging term for a Black person" (Lexico Publishing Group, 2,3). When discussing this topic with someone recently, I mentioned this issue and what a public outcry it would be if someone were to open a restaurant using the slogan "Help stamp out spic food," or "Help stamp out nigger food;" equal comparisons according to the dictionary. Their response was that the gringo slogan is just a joke. So society can look at a disparaging term for a Caucasian person as a joke, but use a disparaging term towards another ethnicity and it's a horrible offense. I personally have never been offended by the gringo slogan. Though, after seriously contemplating all of this information, it makes me wonder if I should be. I certainly feel that the words spic and nigger are reprehensible and would never use either in conversation.

This issue of political correctness is starting to take all of the fun out of the world. In the UK a local council is working to cancel all grants for use of Christmas lights because they are concerned these grants do not support equality (Norvell, 3). For as long as some can remember at the University of Arizona, students have honored the tradition of throwing tortillas at graduation. Students participating in this activity are now looked down on because it is offensive to Mexican-Americans (Norvell, 5). I wonder if any weddings are looked down on because people had a tradition of throwing rice-a common dish to those of Oriental descent. Celebrating Halloween is not even acceptable in some schools. A five-year old child in Tulsa, Oklahoma was forced to spend the whole day at school in nothing but his underwear because he wore a costume, which the school didn't permit (R6). What is a world where you can't wear Halloween costumes to school, marvel at the city Christmas lights, or throw food in celebration? Not the world I grew up in, that's for sure.

I have determined it is nearly an impossible task to be completely politically correct. I imagine that with the rapid changes in acceptable terminology, before we know it schools will be required to hold classes on political correctness. People dislike social labels, but also want to be correctly labeled. People want to be distinct individuals and distinctly grouped with others. The boundaries of political correctness are hard to determine. It only takes one person's perception of an action or statement for it to be construed as offensive. I would hope that a person in this world could relax, have fun, don't worry and be happy. But one can't relax when having to be concerned with political correctness and its consequences every time they act, speak and with every word they write.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: correctness; gay; lesbian; political; politics; race; racism

1 posted on 02/07/2006 12:33:33 AM PST by LivinLovinLife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LivinLovinLife
I imagine that with the rapid changes in acceptable terminology, before we know it schools will be required to hold classes on political correctness.

I think almost all colleges already have mandatory indoctrination for incoming freshmen. Some kind of minority sensitivity training.

By the way welcome to FreeRepublic.

I have to agree with her on every point. Especially that the constant fear that you may offend someone’s sensibilities takes some of the joy out of life.

I would give her an A on this assignment.

2 posted on 02/07/2006 1:01:18 AM PST by Pontiac (Ignorance of the law is no excuse, ignorance of your rights can be fatal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LivinLovinLife

Excellent first post... Welcome to FreeRepublic...


3 posted on 02/07/2006 1:25:07 AM PST by Swordmaker (Beware of Geeks bearing GIFs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LivinLovinLife

Welcome to FR. I can't keep track of all that newspeak, so I'm just an equal opportunity offender.


4 posted on 02/07/2006 1:28:36 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LivinLovinLife

Welcome to the Free Republic LivinLovinLife.

Good post.


5 posted on 02/07/2006 2:41:36 AM PST by mmercier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LivinLovinLife
Political Correctness

Sucks, End of story,

6 posted on 02/07/2006 2:43:42 AM PST by MetalHeadConservative35 (Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes. (i fear the greeks even when they bring gifts))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson