This is beyond wrong

Some Stupid Liberal Blog ^ | 1/28/06 | Some seriously disturbed liberal

[wyattalex]

I was kicking around Blog Explosion today and I came across the most disturbing thing I've ever seen on a liberal's blog. It's a version of that joke "The Aristocrats...

[wyattalex]

I was kicking around Blog Explosion today and I came across the most disturbing thing I've ever seen on a liberal's blog. It's a version of that joke "The Aristocrats." If you know anything about that joke, it's already full of any combination of bestiality, homosexuality, necrophilia, scat, and every other sick perversion, but this version takes it even further and puts the Bush family in the middle of it. While I somewhat support the idea that these people can publically disagree with our President, I think this goes far beyond free speech. Read it at your own risk.

[RedBloodedAmerican]

So why post it on FR?

[wyattalex]

1) to illustrate just the sort of depravity we are up against and

2) so we can freep that sick SOB's blog

[driveserve]

"So why post it on FR?"

I agree. What is you point exactly? That a bunch of lunatic fringe make puerile jokes of our President? We already know that. Posting this is like posting a child-porn photo then decrying child-porn. I'm not too sure of your self-serving, sanctimonious "OH MY GAWD! I'M SO SHOCKED" act. Better you should think twice before posting this kind of sludge.

Free speech, yadda-yadda-yadda. It doesn't belong here in the forum of civilized discourse.

[driveserve]

"1) to illustrate just the sort of depravity we are up against and

2) so we can freep that sick SOB's blog"


Go ahead. FReep away. Knock yourself out. Lets us know how you're doing.

Insofar as illustrating to us, the ignorant, no need to bring the depravity home. It just musses-up the carpet.

[1rudeboy]

1) to illustrate just the sort of depravity we are up against and
Not like some snot-nosed kid's (probably) blog's depravity is in need of illustration.

2) so we can freep that sick SOB's blog
And this will be productive, how?

[wyattalex]

Well geez, it's not like I copied and pasted the full text. I don't see how this is any different than the score of links to DU posts.

[atomicpossum]

Says more about the person who thinks it's worth writing than anyone they're writing about. If there's a joke to it, I'm afraid it missed me entirely.

[driveserve]

"I don't see how this is any different than the score of links to DU posts."

The majority of DUmmie links don't, (The majority? None I've seen), take you to a blog that uses incestuous, scatological, violent, sub-human imagery to make a point. This blog/joke is beyond the pale. It has no place here. That it exists is something we are all aware of. This site is a place where argument should be elevated above those sites that use no intellectualism save their own depravity. We laugh at the poor, helpless shcmucks at DU. We do not laugh at this. This is evil that has no place in the forum of civilized discourse. You should leave it as you would any rotting detritus you happen upon.

[Celtjew Libertarian]

They use the first family and some other Republican politicians and they get a rise out of some people. It's a free country.

Besides, it's a pretty weak version of the joke, if you ask me. I mean, if you just put random people in it, it would be lucky to get a 5 on the aristocat perversion and shock scale.

Now, if you put Mohammed in it, you could get a fatwa on your butt.... Now that might be genuinely gutsy.

[RedBloodedAmerican]

But if you click to the link of his/her/its blog they get traffic and hits and it can turn to cash if ads are hit.