Posted on 01/28/2006 7:02:34 AM PST by Renfield
I haven't forgotten Senator Rockefeller or his plan. And neither has the DOJ. He's going to get nailed and soon.
The "hold up" over the NSA leak investigation for which he is suspect number one, is widening to include his activities in 2002, specifically his act of treason against the US to which he admitted to, but the MSM of course wouldn't report.
Last month I was going to post from this very good article that more eloquently than I outlines the exact nature of Senator John Rockefeller's treason against the United States.
Quote:
"I took a trip by myself in January of 2002 to Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria, and I told each of the heads of state that it was my view that George Bush had already made up his mind to go to war against Iraq – that that was a predetermined set course which had taken shape shortly after 9/11."
So spoke Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) on "Fox Sunday" on November 14, 2005, who at the time of his trip was chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and is now its vice chairman."
We are well familiar with this admission of Senator Rockefeller in Novemeber of last year. What may not be clear is what took place immediately after his visit.
"Senator Rockefeller was at the time of his trip, less than four months after 9/11, Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, which means he was entrusted with "sensitive secured information" as relates existing intelligence regarding Iraq WMD, ongoing intelligence operations looking into Iraq’s WMD program and America’s national security plans concerning the ongoing threat.
Syria was then and remains today on the State Departments list of terror regimes, clearly defined for some years as an enemy to America itself. But Syria was also a close ally to the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq, the very subject of the information Senator Rockefeller chose to share with Hussein’s allies in Syria.
In the weeks that followed Senator Rockefellers’ friendly visit with Syria, CIA operatives began reporting Iraqi convoys traveling across the Syrian border; - a suspected "outsourcing" of Iraq’s WMD, which became the centerpiece of Colin Powell’s case against Iraq before the UN. Those same WMD that would later go missing by the time America entered Iraq 12 months later.
See exact timeline of eventshere
What were Senator Rockefeller’s "intentions" in his visit with three Arab Middle Eastern states four months after 9/11, carrying with him and divulging "national security information" concerning America’s intelligence and related policy towards Iraq? Was his trip an "overt act", and did his trip include a "violation of trust or allegiance" to the United States? Did the information he carried to known U.S. enemies, known allies of the Hussein regime, provide "aid or comfort" to America’s enemies?
According to the definition of treason spelled out in the U.S. Constitution, and Senator Rockefeller’s own account, there has not been a more clear-cut case of treason in modern history. Yet the so-called American press has been completely silent on the subject, which is of course, a form of "aiding and abetting" in and of itself."
When Charles Duelfer in a addendum to his 2004 ISG report stated that while it didn't appear that WMD were moved, he could not completely rule out the possibility. From a Washington Times article from last year:
"But on the question of Syria, Mr. Duelfer did not close the books. "ISG was unable to complete its investigation and is unable to rule out the possibility that WMD was evacuated to Syria before the war," Mr. Duelfer said in a report posted on the CIA's Web site Monday night.
He cited some evidence of a transfer. "Whether Syria received military items from Iraq for safekeeping or other reasons has yet to be determined," he said. "There was evidence of a discussion of possible WMD collaboration initiated by a Syrian security officer, and ISG received information about movement of material out of Iraq, including the possibility that WMD was involved. In the judgment of the working group, these reports were sufficiently credible to merit further investigation."
As I said here Rockefeller is under investigation, and from my source Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI), is also a subject of interest, although this isn't being reported in the MSM, just as they ignored Rockefeller's admission of guilt. But what will be hard not to report on is the fact that a certain "Syrian security officer" has become, shall we say, very 'talkative'.
The question now is whether or not Senator John D. Rockefeller will now resign from his Vice Chairmanship of the Senate Intelligence Committee, or shall he be frog marched from chambers.
Time will tell.
I would personally like to see the second option, with Levin, Durbin and Kerry right behind him in irons.
This Traitor deserves a strong branch and a short rope!
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
Boy, this link is getting a workout today.
I refer to the United States Code:
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 115 > § 2381 Prev | Next
§ 2381. Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002381----000-.html
Why is it too much effort for the Attorney General to empanel a Federal Grand Jury, and let them decide whether the words and actions of such as Joel Stein (of the LA Times) or Senator Rockefeller or even former President Clinton constitute an offense under the above title?
bump for later read
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.