Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court allows campaign finance challenges
Scotusblog ^

Posted on 01/23/2006 8:24:02 AM PST by Tarkin

The Supreme Court ruled on Monday, without dissent, that it has not barred all challenges to actual operation in practice of federal campaign finance restrictions. It ordered a lower court to reconsider an "as-applied" challenge by an anti-abortion group, Wisconsin Right to Life Inc. The unsigned opinion, only two and a half pages in length, was announced by Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. (...)

In other decisions:

No. 04-885, Central Virginia Community College v. Katz, affirmed 5-4, in an opinion written by Justice Stevens, declining to apply the Seminole Tribe sovereign immunity doctrine to claims brought under the Bankruptcy Clause. Justice Thomas dissented, joined by the Chief Justice and by Justices Scalia and Kennedy. Interestingly, if this decision had not been ready to be issued today, the case might well have been held over for reargument. It's the first decision of the Term in which Justice O'Connor cast the deciding vote and in which Justice Alito would likely have come out the other way. (...)

No. 04-597, Unitherm Food Systems v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc., reversed 7-2, in an opinion by Justice Thomas. Justice Stevens dissented, joined by Justice Kennedy


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: campaign; docket; fcc; feingold; mccain; roberts; scotus
Does anybody know what was the last case about?
1 posted on 01/23/2006 8:24:05 AM PST by Tarkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tarkin

BTW, these were probably the last cases in which Sandy participated as the Court will be in recess for the next four weeks.


2 posted on 01/23/2006 8:25:41 AM PST by Tarkin (Impeach Justice Ginsburg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin
If you are interested in reading the whole texts of Supreme Court decisions, bookmark this website: http://www.law.cornell.edu I use this website for research on my monthly columns on constitutional law. The Supreme Court also has the decisions, but in PDF format, which I find hard to use and impossible to clip quotations from. The Cornell site has the same decisions, just as fast, but offers the alternative of HTML format.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "The 'Chocolate' Minds of Mayor Nagin and Senator Clinton"

3 posted on 01/23/2006 8:49:06 AM PST by Congressman Billybob (Hillary! delendum est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin
The Katz case may have come out different if the rats has not delayed the vote one week. SDO's vote would not have counted if Alito would have been confirmed on the 20th. I wonder why Roberts did not delay the handing down of the opinion.
4 posted on 01/23/2006 9:01:41 AM PST by Clump
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson