Posted on 01/10/2006 3:06:32 PM PST by Dan from Michigan
BRADY CENTER ANNOUNCES OPPOSITION TO NOMINATION OF JUDGE SAMUEL ALITO TO US SUPREME COURT
Alito’s Judicial Activism In Machine Gun Case Prompts Brady Center’s First-Ever Opposition to Supreme Court Nominee For Immediate Release: 12-20-2005 Contact Communications: (202) 289-7319 Washington DC - The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence announced today that it is opposing the nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the U.S. Supreme Court. This is the first time the Brady Center has opposed a Supreme Court nomination.
Judge Alito’s nomination poses serious dangers to the safety of our communities, our families, and our children, as evidenced by his troubling dissent in U.S. v. Rybar, 103 F.3d 273 (3rd Cir. 1996). In that case, Judge Alito argued that the federal machine gun ban amounted to an unconstitutional exercise of Congressional power under the Commerce Clause. Alito attempted to erect arbitrary hurdles to Congressional efforts to reduce the availability of machine guns to the criminal element.
In unusually harsh language, the Rybar majority criticized Alito’s dissent as having “no authority” in the law and “run[ning] counter to the deference that the judiciary owes to its two coordinate branches of government….” If Judge Alito’s dissent were to be adopted by the Supreme Court, it would place in jeopardy the ability of Congress to protect the public from gun violence.
Dennis Henigan, Director of the Brady Center’s Legal Action Project, remarked, “Judge Alito’s conclusion that the federal machine gun ban is unconstitutional is right-wing judicial activism at its worst. He demonstrated no respect for the judgment of Congress in seeking to protect the public from the grave dangers of fully automatic weapons.”
In addition to being the dissenting view in the Third Circuit, Judge Alito’s conclusion that the machine gun ban violates the Commerce Clause is so far out of the mainstream of Constitutional jurisprudence that it has been rejected by every other federal appellate court that has considered the issue, including the Second, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth and Eleventh Circuits. The Supreme Court has been asked to review lower court decisions upholding the ban six times and has declined in each case. In June 2005, the Supreme Court issued its latest ruling on Congressional power under the Commerce Clause in Gonzales v. Raich, rejecting the theory advanced in Judge Alito’s Rybar dissent. Six Justices, including Justice Scalia, sustained the application of federal drug laws to intrastate medical marijuana use. Based on this ruling, the Supreme Court vacated a 2-1 ruling in the Ninth Circuit that had declared the machine gun ban to be unconstitutional.
Senators have expressed concerns about Judge Alito’s judicial activism in the Rybar case, including Republican Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma. In a November 6, 2005, interview on Meet the Press, Senator Coburn was asked about Alito’s dissent in Rybar, and Coburn agreed with the Brady Center that it represented improper judicial activism. Coburn stated, “Those aren’t decisions judges should be making. Those are decisions legislators should be making. And that’s how we’ve gotten off on this track is, that we allow judges to start deciding the law.…” Senator Coburn went on to state that Alito’s Rybar opinion was “wrong” and amounted to “legislating” from the bench.
In the Rybar case, Raymond Rybar, Jr., a federally licensed gun dealer, attended a gun show in Monroeville, Pennsylvania on April 4, 1992. He possessed a fully automatic Chinese Type 54, 7.62-millimeter submachine gun, which he sold to Thomas Baublitz. The next day Rybar returned to the gun show and sold Baublitz another fully automatic firearm, a U.S. Military M-3, .45 caliber submachine gun. The guns were sold for a total of $600. Rybar pleaded guilty to two counts of unlawfully possessing a machine gun, with the condition that he be allowed to appeal to allege that the federal machine gun possession restrictions were unconstitutional. If Judge Alito had prevailed in the Rybar case, Raymond Rybar, Jr. would have been set free.
Machine guns are fully automatic weapons that have been heavily regulated since 1934. They fire continuously with one pull of the trigger and can discharge hundreds of rounds in seconds. In 1986, President Reagan signed a federal law banning the manufacture of machine guns for the civilian market and banning the transfer and possession of machine guns not lawfully possessed before May 19, 1986. These “grandfathered” machine guns remain subject to strict registration, possession, transfer, and taxation requirements.
Of course they oppose him... Because they don't want Justices who will enforce the Constitution as it is written.
Of course the Brady Bunch announces their opposition to a friend of gun owners. It would be surprising only if they went the other way.
That's a bit reassuring.
If the Brady Center is against him, he must be a good guy.
Aren't the Brady Campaign and the Brady Center two different sides of the same coin? Kinda like that little stunt the ACLU and its foundation pull so that one of the entities can get tax-exempt status.
The Brady Campaign is about as relevant as a pay phone these days.
Just one more reason to support Alito.
Molon labe, dudes, molon labe!
well then I guess he's OK by me.
Too right. YAWN
For the Record...Alito impresses me as one of the most calm, well prepared, and intelligent people I have heard in a very long time!
Oh, now I am relieved. I wholeheartedly support Judge Alito! :-)
"He demonstrated no respect for the judgement of Congress."
BINGO!!! Congress does not do the judging!
And a nation numb to anymore stupid sky-is-falling gun-control hissy-fits and having long dismissed those who would use a man's personal loss for their own political gain asks itself (or hwo just plain forgot or never heard about these buffoons) asks itself:
What is a Brady Center?
Who is Brady?
Does this have to do with the episode when Marcia & Greg run for office?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.