Posted on 11/06/2005 6:45:52 PM PST by Venator
Performance artist Marina Abramovic really wanted to present, during a week of appearing at the New York Guggenheim Museum, her most radical work, called Rhythm 0. Performed only once in Naples in 1974, its premise was terrifyingly simple: She agreed to stand in a gallery for six hours while anyone who came in could choose any of 72 objects around her - including knives, scissors, a needle, a loaded gun - and do anything they wanted to her with the objects. It was her only work in which she essentially ceded control over her body, and over the pain to be inflicted, to her audience. The participants became involved slowly at first, but after a while Ms. Abramovics clothes were cut off, and her body marked, burned and cut. Finally, a man took the gun and made her put it up to her head, trying to force her to squeeze the trigger. She didnt resist, but a fight ensued as other spectators intervened. This was the only performance where I was really ready to die, she said
But she will not get the chance to demonstrate that proposition at the Guggenheim, at least in so stark a fashion. She and Nancy Spector, the museums curator of contemporary art, had long discussions about the dangers involved in the piece, about the difficulty - or near impossibility - of getting permission for the gun and about whether the piece could be staged without it.
The risks really outweighed anything else, Ms. Spector said, and then it really came down to the legal questions. We just couldnt find a way to have a loaded gun in the museum.
Art, and the New York-chapter of the contemporary Community of Fashion, are prepared to tolerate public exhibitions of nudity, games of dominance and submission, and experiments in sadism on the part of volunteer amateurs in the name of art. No form of sexual perversion or psychological depravity will be denied entry to shrines and temples of High Culture today, as long as any sort of crudely forged passport purporting to be issued by the muses is presented. A loaded pistol is something else again.
It was not the possibility of injury being inflicted really. Ms. Abramowic had desired to top off her week at the Guggenheim with a real show-stopper. She had been hoping to re-enact a near mythical event in the canon of performance art: the crucifixion presented in Venice, CA in 1973 in which the victim arranged to have his hands nailed to roof of a Volkswagen. Alas! the original artist declined to extend the necessary permission to copy his work.
No, it was the insurance, along with, of course, the inflexibility of the museum staffs hoplophobia. Social taboos concerning sex, bourgeois morality, the dignity of the human body can all be compromised in the service of art; but, in the final analysis, not Gun Control.
[mattdono shakes head]. Sickos.
Future Darwin Arward Candidate
Cut her to shreds with a machete, no problem. Bash her skull in, perfectly allowable. But bring a gun on the premises? Unthinkable!
That's just funny, so this performance artist owns the copyright to public crucifixion? Yeah, right.
Is it just me, or has intellectual property rights law spun out of control?
Art ping.
Let Sam Cree or me know if you want on or off this ping list.
I don't have a few of the more recent additions to this list here with me at work. My apologies.
You got that right. Which one of the animals at the zoo will be the first to chomp on the red meat?
Now that was a discussion that should have taken 20 seconds, max.
What is it with people whose names sound like "spectre".
Lunatics?
Leni
Sounds like one of my sister's patients, but without the verrrry long sleeved jacket.
And I am talking about the "artist", the audience 'participants', and the museum staff.
I don't care what they say, this isn't art, it's insanity.
so if we are incensed, or uneasy, or say they are lunatics or they are ripping off our tax dollars or arts awards dollars, we are 'bourgeois'....
sorry, that's where I get off the art lover's bus and walk...
Sad the lengths people with no talent will travel to try to convince themselves and others that they're "artists"......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.