Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Last Taboo
New York Times -- Sunday Art Section ^ | 11-6-05 | Never Yet Melted

Posted on 11/06/2005 6:45:52 PM PST by Venator

Performance artist Marina Abramovic really wanted to present, during a week of appearing at the New York Guggenheim Museum, her most radical work, called “Rhythm 0.” Performed only once in Naples in 1974, its premise was terrifyingly simple: She agreed to stand in a gallery for six hours while anyone who came in could choose any of 72 objects around her - including knives, scissors, a needle, a loaded gun - and do anything they wanted to her with the objects. It was her only work in which she essentially ceded control over her body, and over the pain to be inflicted, to her audience. The participants became involved slowly at first, but after a while Ms. Abramovic’s clothes were cut off, and her body marked, burned and cut. Finally, a man took the gun and made her put it up to her head, trying to force her to squeeze the trigger. She didn’t resist, but a fight ensued as other spectators intervened. “This was the only performance where I was really ready to die,” she said

But she will not get the chance to demonstrate that proposition at the Guggenheim, at least in so stark a fashion. She and Nancy Spector, the museum’s curator of contemporary art, had long discussions about the dangers involved in the piece, about the difficulty - or near impossibility - of getting permission for the gun and about whether the piece could be staged without it.

“The risks really outweighed anything else,” Ms. Spector said, “and then it really came down to the legal questions. We just couldn’t find a way to have a loaded gun in the museum.

Art, and the New York-chapter of the contemporary Community of Fashion, are prepared to tolerate public exhibitions of nudity, games of dominance and submission, and experiments in sadism on the part of volunteer amateurs in the name of art. No form of sexual perversion or psychological depravity will be denied entry to shrines and temples of High Culture today, as long as any sort of crudely forged passport purporting to be issued by the muses is presented. A loaded pistol is something else again.

It was not the possibility of injury being inflicted really. Ms. Abramowic had desired to top off her week at the Guggenheim with a real show-stopper. She had been hoping to re-enact a “near mythical event in the canon of performance art:” the crucifixion presented in Venice, CA in 1973 in which the victim arranged to have his hands nailed to roof of a Volkswagen. Alas! the original “artist” declined to extend the necessary permission to copy his work.

No, it was the insurance, along with, of course, the inflexibility of the museum staffs’ hoplophobia. Social taboos concerning sex, bourgeois morality, the dignity of the human body can all be compromised in the service of art; but, in the final analysis, not Gun Control.


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: abramovic; anramovic; art; decadence; guggenheim; guncontrol; publicnudity; sadism

1 posted on 11/06/2005 6:45:54 PM PST by Venator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Venator

[mattdono shakes head]. Sickos.


2 posted on 11/06/2005 6:50:02 PM PST by mattdono ("Crush the RATs and RINOs, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of the scumbags" - Arnie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venator

Future Darwin Arward Candidate


3 posted on 11/06/2005 6:50:39 PM PST by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venator

Cut her to shreds with a machete, no problem. Bash her skull in, perfectly allowable. But bring a gun on the premises? Unthinkable!


4 posted on 11/06/2005 6:56:16 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venator
Alas! the original “artist” declined to extend the necessary permission to copy his work.

That's just funny, so this performance artist owns the copyright to public crucifixion? Yeah, right.

Is it just me, or has intellectual property rights law spun out of control?

5 posted on 11/06/2005 7:03:04 PM PST by Valpal1 (Crush jihadists, drive collaborators before you, hear the lamentations of their media. Allahu FUBAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree; Liz; Joe 6-pack; woofie; vannrox; giotto; iceskater; Conspiracy Guy; Dolphy; ...

Art ping.

Let Sam Cree or me know if you want on or off this ping list.

I don't have a few of the more recent additions to this list here with me at work. My apologies.


6 posted on 11/10/2005 6:40:36 AM PST by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venator
Nothing but a psychology experiment posing as art.
7 posted on 11/10/2005 7:55:24 AM PST by LexBaird (tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird
Nothing but a psychology experiment posing as art.

You got that right. Which one of the animals at the zoo will be the first to chomp on the red meat?

8 posted on 11/10/2005 8:00:53 AM PST by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Venator
"She and Nancy Spector, curator, had long discussions about the dangers involved, blah, blah.....about the difficulty, blah, blah....about the near impossibility, blah, blah.....about whether the piece could be staged, blah, blah....."

Now that was a discussion that should have taken 20 seconds, max.

What is it with people whose names sound like "spectre".

Lunatics?

Leni

9 posted on 11/10/2005 8:01:39 AM PST by MinuteGal (This Week is my Seventh Anniversary on this Forum...and I'm Still in Love with Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republicanprofessor
This is too much.
10 posted on 11/10/2005 9:31:10 AM PST by Argh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Venator

Sounds like one of my sister's patients, but without the verrrry long sleeved jacket.

And I am talking about the "artist", the audience 'participants', and the museum staff.


11 posted on 11/10/2005 10:52:30 AM PST by GladesGuru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venator

I don't care what they say, this isn't art, it's insanity.


12 posted on 11/10/2005 3:12:43 PM PST by Vor Lady (Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venator
'Social taboos concerning sex, bourgeois morality,..

so if we are incensed, or uneasy, or say they are lunatics or they are ripping off our tax dollars or arts awards dollars, we are 'bourgeois'....

sorry, that's where I get off the art lover's bus and walk...

13 posted on 11/10/2005 7:53:42 PM PST by bitt ('George Bush was to go up in flames this Fall, not Paris.'...Richard Baehr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venator

Sad the lengths people with no talent will travel to try to convince themselves and others that they're "artists"......


14 posted on 11/10/2005 8:59:37 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson