Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HARRIET MIERS OUTSHINES BORK
MoonbatCentral.com ^ | October 4, 2005 | Richard Poe

Posted on 10/04/2005 3:20:22 PM PDT by Richard Poe

HARRIET MIERS OUTSHINES BORK

Unlike the Patron Saint of Originalism, Miers Will Defend Our Freedom


Judge Robert H. Bork has come to represent in many conservative minds the gold standard of legal sagacity against which provincial upstarts such as Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers must be weighed.  In truth, however, Bork provides a poor example of conservative jurisprudence. Even as simple a phrase as, "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" has long confounded Judge Bork. Harriet Miers suffers no such confusion.

Following a July 1, 1992 incident in which a crazed gunman slew two lawyers and two judges in a Texas courtroom, Miers wrote in the Texas Lawyer, "How does a free society prevent a man from entering a courtroom and opening fire?" (hat tip, David Kopel)

The very liberties we hold dear, such as, "access to public places, the right to bear arms and freedom from constant surveillance" make such crimes possible, noted Miers. Yet, she concluded, "We are not willing to sacrifice these rights because of the acts of maniacs."

By contrast, Robert Bork dismisses the Second Amendment as a useless relic of bygone days.  In his 1996 book Slouching Towards Gomorrah he writes that, "The Supreme Court has consistently ruled that there is no individual right to own a firearm" — a statement which is demonstrably untrue. Bork also writes:

"The Second Amendment was designed to allow states to defend themselves against a possibly tyrannical national government. Now that the federal government has stealth bombers and nuclear weapons, it is hard to imagine what people would need to keep in the garage to serve that purpose.''

Perhaps if Judge Bork had found himself besieged by gangs in post-Katrina New Orleans, he might have gained a healthy appreciation for the utility of SKS rifles and AR-15s in modern life.  How much more would he have appreciated such hardware, had he found himself surveying the smoking ruins of an American city flattened by nuclear terror attack, devoid of police and swarming with brigands.

But Judge Bork is one of those men who cannot "imagine" what he has not personally experienced.  And so the "brilliant" jurist discarded James Madison's handiwork as casually as he would a soiled Kleenex.

If this is brilliance, how exactly should we define stupidity?

In today's American Thinker, Thomas Lifson exposes the snobbery which underlies so many conservative denunciations of Harriet Miers. He writes:

"Thus we hear conservatives sniffing that a Southern Methodist University legal education is just too non-Ivy League, adopting a characteristic trope of blue state elitists. We hear conservatives bemoaning a lack of judicial experience, and not a single law review article in the last decade as evidence of a second rate mind."

The outrage certain conservative pundits have displayed in the face of President Bush's decision to elevate Harriet Miers over their Ivy League classmates may be understandable. But it is not helpful. Nor is it admirable.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: banglist; harrietmiers; judicialnominees; richardpoe; robertbork; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last
To: ConservativeAgenda; ladyinred; BeHoldAPaleHorse; GeorgeW23225
ConservativeAgenda wrote: I've recently noticed a lot of Freepers being critical, if not intolerant, of fellow Freepers who criticize or dissent from President Bush.

Heck, to me it seems the other way around, and increasingly so. If I support President Bush and choose to give him the benefit of the doubt on this nomination (and other issues), I'm a "koolaid drinker" and a "bushbot," or worse.

121 posted on 10/05/2005 12:50:55 AM PDT by Wolfstar ("And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm." GWB, 1/20/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
Yes, that is the one. Thanks, I did not catch his name as I started listening after the introduction.

How are ya doin', Hawk-eye? Is it snowing out there yet?
122 posted on 10/05/2005 12:59:04 AM PDT by Goodgirlinred ( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Can you not follow a conversation on this forum?


123 posted on 10/05/2005 1:04:00 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

There have been at least a dozen if not more threads about Miers, and I have been reading several on and off all day. Your comment was the first one I've seen that mentioned her health.


124 posted on 10/05/2005 1:13:35 AM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; Howlin

"There have been at least a dozen if not more threads about Miers, and I have been reading several on and off all day. Your comment was the first one I've seen that mentioned her health."

She wasn't talking about Miers. If you would have bothered to follow the conversation back, you would find out that she was talking about how Dick Cheney was received here on Free Republic in 2000.


125 posted on 10/05/2005 5:15:58 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

I should have gone to bed before attempting to read the thread.

Brain wasn't working, obviously.


126 posted on 10/05/2005 8:37:15 AM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: fizziwig

I understand.

My problem isn't with Rush Limbaugh.

I just wish FReepers would take a wait and see attitude also. I think many of them will be deliriously happy after the Senate confirmation hearings begin.


127 posted on 10/05/2005 8:52:20 AM PDT by GeorgeW23225 ("Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

I agree.

The knee jerk reactionaries can be a bit smothering, and intolerant can't they??

Most of the time, they just end up with egg on their faces.......and they deserve it!!


128 posted on 10/05/2005 8:55:26 AM PDT by GeorgeW23225 ("Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: safisoft

The only "dim-witted" people are those who are pre-judging the nomination of Harriet Miers to be a poor choice BEFORE the Senate confirmation hearings even start!!

Give the lady a chance, PLEASE!!!


129 posted on 10/05/2005 8:58:20 AM PDT by GeorgeW23225 ("Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeAgenda

I doubt if anyone wants to squash dissent or criticism.

What makes me upset is the unfounded criticism of a nominee even BEFORE the Senate confirmation hearings begin.


But, then again, a lot of FReepers actually like being made to look foolish with their over reactions.........


130 posted on 10/05/2005 9:05:00 AM PDT by GeorgeW23225 ("Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I don't understand the lust for blood either. Especially when you can win the fight without ANY blood letting.

Let the democRATS look like the obstructionists they are, and let the American people see them as the dividers, not the uniters.

Just in time for the mid term elections.....now that is absolutely delicious!!


131 posted on 10/05/2005 9:13:51 AM PDT by GeorgeW23225 ("Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I'm glad I missed all the wailing and gnashing of teeth over the Cheney as V.P. pick.

But, it proves my point, doesn't it?? You would think that the over-reactors would learn from their mistakes. But, they don't. They just love diving into an empty pool!!


132 posted on 10/05/2005 9:21:47 AM PDT by GeorgeW23225 ("Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeW23225
Give the lady a chance

I am sure she ia a very nice Christian lady. I am sure that she is very loyal to Bush. I am sure that she is very smart. I am not sure that Bush made the right choice... which means that if I, and many like me feel this way, it was in fact a very foolish choice for Bush. That is my point.

He owed it to conservatives who helped elect him, to nominate someone WE could know and not have to ASSUME that because he 'looked into her heart' all would be OK. If she was the ONLY person qualified it would be something, but don't insult us and tell us that she was the BEST we can get. Bush screwed up big time on this one. Even if she turns out to be stellar, Bush has damaged his base irreparably - and because it was unnecessary, that adds up to dim -wittedness.
133 posted on 10/05/2005 9:31:06 AM PDT by safisoft (Give me Torah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing

I totally agree.

I also believe a lot of cynicism and pessimism will be erased during the Senate confirmation hearings.

Read my lips: The choice of Harriet Miers will turn out to be one of the most brilliant political manuevers ever made.

The democRATS are tied up in knots, unsure of how to deal with it, and they are totally clueless on how to proceed.

I love it!!


134 posted on 10/05/2005 9:32:11 AM PDT by GeorgeW23225 ("Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: safisoft
The President campaigned on a promise to nominate judges who would NOT legislate from the bench. ALL of his appointments to the bench, whether it be Owens, Pryor, or Brown, will do that. And so will Harriet Miers.

The President made a promise to Conservatives, and he has kept it. And since he has, we owe him loyalty!!

If after the Senate confirmation hearings, you still have a problem with the choice, you have a right and a duty to complain. But, I feel your cynicism and criticism is premature, unfounded and unnecessary.

Why have the Senate version of Armageddon with the choice of Janice Rogers Brown, when you can have the same result on the Supreme Court without a fight?? Brown would NOT have been confirmed anyway, NOT with people in the Senate like McCain, and his gang of 14.
135 posted on 10/05/2005 9:47:23 AM PDT by GeorgeW23225 ("Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeW23225
Great Post!! You will be proven correct in a short time!!

She will turn out to be a great choice!!
136 posted on 10/05/2005 9:52:40 AM PDT by BobFromNJ (yo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
It will do no good to point out this woman's attributes. The bash Bush crowd will not be stilled.

Hey, I'm coming around, there's hope ...

137 posted on 10/05/2005 9:55:00 AM PDT by 11th_VA (Geezee Freepin Peezee ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fizziwig

I don't think that anyone has considered the fact that Bush may have thought that this was not the time for a knock down, drag out battle with the left, when he has so much else going on, that demand his full attention. Maybe that is what Rush meant when he said that Bush must have felt that he couldn't depend on the Repulcan legislators to fight the battle for his nominee if there was much of a paper trail.


138 posted on 10/05/2005 9:55:41 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: safisoft

One other thing.

President Bush has NOT irreparably damaged his base. YOU are doing that, not the President!!


139 posted on 10/05/2005 10:02:42 AM PDT by GeorgeW23225 ("Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

Bump.


140 posted on 10/05/2005 10:16:00 AM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson