|
|
|
Hillary in Aviary
But the obsessively perfectionistic dodo wasn't able to fake even one wrong answer in the Letterman phony "pop quiz," a nostalgic electuary of "Twenty-One" fraud and (Groucho) Marxist left-wing crow.
Instead, this documented incompetent with no apparent creative or analytic (not to mention thespian) skills gushed forth with a lame--"It's the bluebird--I know that" --globally exposing herself to be the corrupt clown that the sentient among us already know she is.
It is no accident--and the Sheehy hagiography notwithstanding, it is certainly not because of any patriarchal society--that this reflexive kleptocrat never sought office. She never ran simply because she is a perfectionist and an incompetent who cannot tolerate personal (as opposed to bill-related) criticism, witness the prescreened, heavily controlled, sycophantic crowds, her pre-programmed, totally scripted appearances (or, alternatively, her totally mute "listening tour"), her unavailability to the press, indeed, her "bluebird."
Thus, the question begging to be asked is this:
Why would this compulsively perfectionistic grotesquerie allow herself to be unambiguously exposed as the utter incompetent and fraud and fool and horror that she is?
And why would this self-proclaimed protector of "the children" prolong her own child's profound trauma by forcing her own bottom-heavy self, soiled in its own right, onto the political stage?
The answer, I believe, resides more in liberty loss than in power gain.
Simply put, she is not running for office; she is running from indictment.
And I fear Starr successor, Robert Ray, is unable to catch her...
Ray's recent statement , " I have been charged with responsibly conducting the work of this office. Some of my responsibility is to ensure that there is no untoward effect on the political process," both confirms and encourages this latest round of clinton raping, pillaging, despoiling, destroying.
Will this nightmare never end?
|
"Bird of paradise" would have been a brilliant wrong answer for the New-York-state-bird question; in one fell swoop it would have flattered the necessary constituency, rendered hillary's cheating marginally believable and suggested a quick, secure, creative mind.
|
ANDREA MITCHELL CARRIES OBLIGATORY ANTI-JEANINE WATER FOR HILLARY CLINTON
 (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
MS. MITCHELL: But let's also talk about another political battle which is Hillary Clinton's new opponent in New York. Let's take a look at what could be one of the most lively races, Jeanine Pirro, the county D.A. in Westchester County, who launched her campaign, and take a look at her launch. Here she is trying to describe and explain why she is running again Hillary Clinton. She had a page missing. Not exactly a great kickoff.
E.J., is this a real threat to Mrs. Clinton?
MR. DIONNE: I think that Ms. Pirro's challenge is not to have her entire campaign defined by the sentence, "Do you have page 10?" It was really a remarkable moment. Look, she's a lady...
MS. MITCHELL: And her husband was nowhere in sight, of course. He is a convicted felon. Is this also going to be race where you've got two very accomplished women trying to keep their husbands off of the podium?
MR. DIONNE: Given the comparison, I think Mrs. Clinton may bring out her husband as often as possible. You know, she is taking a chance. Mrs. Clinton is way ahead in the polls. She's been a very good politician in New York state and Ms. Pirro is hoping to get at least some attention out of this. She's got to run at least better than Congressman Lazio did against Mrs. Clinton last time, which wasn't that good. This was not an auspicious start for her campaign.
MS. MITCHELL: But, Byron, does Hillary Clinton have to come up with an answer in '06 when she's running for reelection as to whether or not she is then going to turn around and run for president in '08?
MR. YORK: I don't think so. I don't think she's facing an unforgiving public in New York, and I think if she runs for reelection and wins, which she most likely will, she'll be able to turn around and run for president and not alienate any of her supporters, although her husband did say recently that, you know, you lookyou have to look to the next election or you may not get past the next election.
Illustrating that the difference between useful idiot and purveyor of access journalism is academic, Ms. Mitchell raced through missus clinton's risible talking points du jour yesterday, under the theory, so it seems, that increased velocity decreases, if not absurdity, notice.
THE TALKING POINTS
|
|
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor by Mia T, 8.03.05  (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) MAD hillary series #5 WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS FOR THE CHILDREN FOR AMERICA FOR THE WORLD
|
