Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian WMDs hidden in U.S.? (New evidence suggests al-Qaida after them)
WorldNetDaily ^ | 7/13/05 | WorldNetDaily

Posted on 07/13/2005 6:28:56 PM PDT by wagglebee

WASHINGTON – It was little more than a rumor during the darkest days of the Cold War.

Did agents of the Soviet Union conceal nuclear and biological weapons of mass destruction inside the U.S. and other western cities?

New evidence suggests they did – and that Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida terrorists network is determined to find them and use them with the help of bribed Russian spies or special forces soldiers who have maintained their secret locations for all these years.

According to a report by Gordon Thomas and David M. Dastych in the latest issue of the Polish news and opinion weekly Wprost, U.S. authorities searched in vain for the nuclear devices in New York City the day after the Sept. 11, 2001, al-Qaida attacks.

They had been tipped off about the possible existence of Russian "suitcase nukes" in the area by officials in Poland and the Czech Republic, according to the report.

No nuclear weapons were found Sept. 12, 2001, or thereafter. But, more recently, U.S. intelligence services have become concerned about efforts by terrorists to buy off former Soviet and current Russian agents with knowledge of the weapons.

The report also cites the work of Paul L. Williams, an investigative reporter, former FBI consultant and author of several books, including "Osama's Revenge: The Next 9/11," which claims al-Qaida sleeper agents have already stashed suitcase nukes in several major U.S. cities as well as Rappahannock, Va., where the U.S. government maintains an underground bunker as a command-and-control center for wartime or national emergency.

As WorldNetDaily reported earlier this week, Williams describes how al-Qaida has already purchased some post-Soviet mini-nukes and hired Russians to help them operate them. The report was first published in Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence newsletter published by WND's founder.

Williams predicted in his book a nuclear attack by al-Qaida would be launched before the end of 2005.

Several U.S. officials have alluded to the threat recently.

"It may be only a matter of time before al-Qaida or another group attempts to use chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear weapons," said Porter Goss, director of central intelligence before a Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

Robert S. Mueller III, director of the FBI, said: "I am also very concerned with a growing body of sensitive reporting that continues to show al-Qaida's clear intention to obtain and ultimately use some form of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear or high-energy explosives material in its attacks against America."

In addition, Thomas and Dastych report Britain's MI5 has identified 32 spies of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service operating under full diplomatic cover from their London embassy. The spies reportedly have links to deep-cover KGB agents who, during the Cold War, hid scores of genetically engineered biological warfare weapons in Britain's countryside. MI5 believes the Russian spies are still actively concealing the locations of the germ vials.

Meanwhile, KGB spymaster Alexander Kouzminov confirms his agents planted the vials. He, too, believes Russian agents are still involved in guarding them.

"Huge efforts and money was spent in our work," he explained. "It would be foolish to believe our people were stood down just because Russia took part in biological weapons talks in Geneva."


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: alqaedanukes; alqaida; jihadinamerica; russianwmds; sovietunion; suitcasenukes; wmds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: _Jim
I'm no expert, but I handled weapons for the USAF in the 90's, and they are pretty robust. Our back door is wide open and there is no stopping a determined enemy from performing maintenance on in place devices.
61 posted on 07/14/2005 6:20:34 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup (The cheese stands alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
I'm no expert, but I handled weapons for the USAF in the 90's, and they are pretty robust.
Nukes are a different story; you wanna keep heading down this road?
62 posted on 07/14/2005 6:28:27 PM PDT by _Jim (<--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: _Jim

By weapons, I meant tactical nukes carried by F-15's, F-16's, and A-10's. And no, this road is going nowhere.


63 posted on 07/14/2005 6:32:50 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup (The cheese stands alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
tactical nukes
'They' still obey the laws of physics and the active components, to quote BeHoldAPaleHorse "The critical components raidiate, oxidate, and deteriorate."

IOW, every nuke has a shelf life, even ours.

Good thread on this on a closely related note:

20 Nuclear Suitcase Bombs inside the USA

Those clowns, our enemies, have trouble organizing all what I would call 'basic manuevers' via a few highly-motivated and driven individuals at the 'top' of their org structures; witness Mohammed Atta and the two planes which stuck the WTC towerrs - I submit to you that the other two aircraft did not reach their intended targets owing to the actual ineffectiveness of those crews aboard. One aircraft instead settled for a target of opportunity, the other didn't stand a chance once 'our' rules of engagement changed after the passengers learned via GTE Airphone what was happening ...

64 posted on 07/14/2005 6:57:13 PM PDT by _Jim (<--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: nw_arizona_granny

YES! You're the winner!

So, after reading this article and ASSUMING there is some truth to it, the big question is...

...where are they now?


65 posted on 07/14/2005 8:27:51 PM PDT by compuguru (De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson