Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Military Report: The High Death Rates Exposed (?????)
TBR News ^ | June 12, 2005 | Brian Herring

Posted on 06/16/2005 1:56:30 PM PDT by lugsoul

US Military Report: The High Death Rates exposed by Brian Harring

The Bush Butcher’s Bill: Officially, 40 US Military Deaths in Iraq from 1 through 11 May, 2005 – Official Total of 1,791 US Dead to date (and rising)

U.S. Military Personnel who died in German hospitals or en route to German hospitals have not previously been counted. They total about 6,210 as of 1 January, 2005. The ongoing, underreporting of the dead in Iraq, is not accurate. The DoD is deliberately reducing the figures. A review of many foreign news sites show that actual deaths are far higher than the newly reduced ones. Iraqi civilian casualties are never reported but International Red Cross, Red Crescent and UN figures indicate that as of 1 January 2005, the numbers are just under 100,000.

Note: There is excellent reason to believe that the Department of Defense is deliberately not reporting a significant number of the dead in Iraq. We have received copies of manifests from the MATS that show far more bodies shipped into Dover AFP than are reported officially. The educated rumor is that the actual death toll is in excess of 7,000. Given the officially acknowledged number of over 15,000 seriously wounded, this elevated death toll is far more realistic than the current 1,400+ now being officially published. When our research is complete, and watertight, we will publish the results along with the sources In addition to the evident falsification of the death rolls, at least 5,500 American military personnel have deserted, most in Ireland but more have escaped to Canada and other European countries, none of whom are inclined to cooperate with vengeful American authorities. (See TBR News of 18 February for full coverage on the mass desertions) This means that of the 158,000 U.S. military shipped to Iraq, 26,000 either deserted, were killed or seriously wounded. The DoD lists currently being very quietly circulated indicate almost 9,000 dead, over 16,000 seriously wounded* (See note below. This figure is now over 24,000 Ed) and a large number of suicides, forced hospitalization for ongoing drug usage and sales, murder of Iraqi civilians and fellow soldiers , rapes, courts martial and so on –

Because I cannot publish the DoD pdf file in this country (no one has said anything about it being published outside the country) I am working up a specific overview for posting and my lawyer has made the following suggestion for me. I think it’s good and it certainly is legal.

I have a copy of the official DoD casualty list. I am alphabetizing it with the reported date of death following. TBR will post this list in sections and when this is circulated widely by veteran groups and other concerned sites, if people who do not see their loved one’s names, are requested to inform their Congressman, their local paper, us and other concerned people as soon as possible.

The government gets away with these huge lies because they claim, falsely, that only soldiers actually killed on the ground in Iraq are reported. The dying and critically wounded are listed as en route to military hospitals outside of the country and not reported on the daily postings. Anyone who dies just as the transport takes off from the Baghdad airport is not listed and neither are those who die in the US military hospitals. Their families are certainly notified that their son, husband, brother or lover was dead and the bodies, or what is left of them (refrigeration is very bad in Iraq what with constant power outages) are shipped home, to Dover AFB. You ought to realize that President Bush personally ordered that no pictures be taken of the coffined and flag-draped dead under any circumstances. He claims that this is to comfort the bereaved relatives but is designed to keep the huge number of arriving bodies secret. Any civilian, or military personnel, taking pictures will be jailed at once and prosecuted. Bush has never attended any kind of a memorial service for his dead soldiers and never will. He is terrified some parent might curse him in front of the press or, worse, attack him. As Bush is a coward and in denial, this is not a surprise.

This listing program is about finished and we will start publishing in the very near future so act accordingly. If there is an actual variance of, say, 10 names, that is acceptable. 50 would indicate sloppiness and anything over 100 a positive sign of lying.

*The latest on the wounded: “Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany, is a 150-bed hospital that's already seen over 24,000 wounded military patients from Iraq and Afghanistan since the commencement of hostilities “. Knight Ridder Newspapers June 6, 2005 (Note: The Pentagon refuses to publish accurate lists of any wounded. Ed)


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
Okay - this is obviously pretty wacky. But it does raise an interesting question about the reporting of deaths, since the announcements usually track the news stories reporting deaths on the ground. Is it true that DoD is not including the death of those evacuated with injuries in the total count? If this is not true, it needs to be debunked.

Any evidence on the topic would be helpful - including correlation of names on the official list with soldiers, sailors, or marines who have died in Germany or elsewhere.

1 posted on 06/16/2005 1:56:31 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

I doubt its true, but so help me God if it is . . .

Alas, I'm not going to give it a second thought until I get more proof!


2 posted on 06/16/2005 1:58:24 PM PDT by ruiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

Soldiers die in war. Why do you think it makes such a big difference between 1700 or 1791? Are you suggesting there is a conspiracy to underreport only 5% of the fatalities?


3 posted on 06/16/2005 2:00:07 PM PDT by econ_grad (The US Constitution presents no significant challenge to the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruiner

It is not true. Every Death is reported, even those who die in the hospital, which have been very few.I have a friend who works in the ICU at Lundstrum and they do a wonderful job of keeping our guys alive and able to recover.


4 posted on 06/16/2005 2:02:23 PM PDT by milbuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

This is an obvious anti-Bush website. Just so ya know.


5 posted on 06/16/2005 2:02:33 PM PDT by xrp (Fox News Channel should rename itself the Missing Persons Network)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

I'd think it would be pretty odd if Ted Koppel was reading the names of every single American killed in Iraq and there were like 14,000 parents who didn't hear their kids name.


6 posted on 06/16/2005 2:02:38 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (It's the Anti-Americanism, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

It's not true. I've a son in Ramadi. I follow DOD list religiously. Those that die of wounds later are reported.
Nor did Bush order the casket pictures to be kept secret. That happened years before. And I am no Bush fan.


7 posted on 06/16/2005 2:03:50 PM PDT by JeeperFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

Liberal propaganda. Ignore it.


8 posted on 06/16/2005 2:03:55 PM PDT by Right_at_RiceU (You don't need a gun to kill hippies, just soap or work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

...This means that of the 158,000 U.S. military shipped to Iraq, 26,000 either deserted, were killed or seriously wounded. The DoD lists currently being very quietly circulated indicate almost 9,000 dead, over 16,000 seriously wounded* (See note below. This figure is now over 24,000 Ed) and a large number of suicides, forced hospitalization for ongoing drug usage and sales, murder of Iraqi civilians ...

This is crap.


9 posted on 06/16/2005 2:03:57 PM PDT by DHerion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

I wouldn't be surprised if the total dead is higher. And the seriously wounded is in the thousands..... we are stupid if we expect to replay vietnam exactly and are waiting for victory.

If you want victory you have to fight like WW2. We are Naming this thing.

There is NO reason we should allow Syria to kill our troops without even lifting a finger - DO YOU HEAR ME mR. BUSH!


10 posted on 06/16/2005 2:04:05 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xrp
Anti-Bush that is putting it mildly. It appears to be some sort of screwball pro-Nazi revisionist, moral equivalence site.
11 posted on 06/16/2005 2:04:21 PM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad
U.S. Military Personnel who died in German hospitals or en route to German hospitals have not previously been counted. They total about 6,210 as of 1 January, 2005.

This is the claim they're trying to make.
12 posted on 06/16/2005 2:04:26 PM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad
I don't think that's what his numbers say, though that seems to be what the headline says. Looks more like he is saying it isn't 1700, or 1791, but 7000.

That being said, if medevacs aren't included in the total, that would likely be more than 90 or so. We've had several thousand medevac'd from Iraq, and one could assume they are the serious cases. I doubt the fatality rate would be that low.

13 posted on 06/16/2005 2:04:45 PM PDT by lugsoul ("She talks and she laughs." - Tom DeLay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Iraqi civilian casualties are never reported but International Red Cross, Red Crescent and UN figures indicate that as of 1 January 2005, the numbers are just under 100,000.

That's not true (if "casualties" means "deaths"), so presumably the rest is equally dubious.

14 posted on 06/16/2005 2:04:59 PM PDT by untenured (http://futureuncertain.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xrp

The Army is not organized enough to keep this many deaths secret for this long. This is not a true statistic. We've lost the better part of 2,000 young men and women and we should not lose sight of that, but as you say, this is an anti-Bush website and appears to have little regard for the truth.

Thag


15 posted on 06/16/2005 2:05:18 PM PDT by thag (Cuffs and leather and a whip that stings-These are a few of my favorite things.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

Where did you get this dumb story?


16 posted on 06/16/2005 2:05:26 PM PDT by jveritas (The Left cannot win a national election ever again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority; lugsoul
* OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM includes casualties that occurred on or after March 19, 2003 in the Arabian Sea, Bahrain, Gulf of Aden, Gulf of Oman, Iraq, Kuwait, Oman, Persian Gulf, Qatar, Red Sea, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/casualty.pdf

17 posted on 06/16/2005 2:06:06 PM PDT by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Moderator please pull out this lie.


18 posted on 06/16/2005 2:06:06 PM PDT by jveritas (The Left cannot win a national election ever again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Yeah, I just looked over it in more detail and it is clear that it is anti-Christian, anti-Bush, anti-conservative and anti-American.


19 posted on 06/16/2005 2:06:10 PM PDT by xrp (Fox News Channel should rename itself the Missing Persons Network)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

Only read the headline. Stand corrected.


20 posted on 06/16/2005 2:06:33 PM PDT by econ_grad (The US Constitution presents no significant challenge to the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson