Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jerk Radio: Another Imus Controversy Leads to Termination
Radio Equalizer Blog ^ | 05/26/05 | Brian Maloney

Posted on 05/26/2005 12:20:09 AM PDT by raccoonradio

What Keeps Don Imus On The Air?

How does a crusty, mean-spirited, Kerry-supporting fossil like Don Imus manage to stay on the air?

Does he have the best lawyers, who write iron-clad contracts? A world-class superagent? Compromising photos of corporate execs? All of the above?

Or is it simply the age-old art of coasting on one's earlier success, where a shrinking energy level meets increasing compensation? That's the Radio Equalizer's best guess.

Something has to explain how Imus manages to remain not only on major radio stations in New York, Boston and other cities, while keeping his morning MSNBC similcast, despite one ugly controversy after another.

It certainly isn't a strong ratings performance: he's been slowly fading into the New York sunset for 20 years. New breakdowns should be available in the next few days and no big surge is expected to be revealed.

Nor is it energy, personality, passion, prep work, or other redeeming characteristics that might give stations a continuing reason to run his morning program.

Recently, it's even worse than bad, boring talk programming, it's jerk radio. When was he last entertaining? Who can remember?

While never regarded as warm and fuzzy, recently it's become increasingly mean, in a way that ought to scare advertisers away for good.

Could Rush Limbaugh, or other conservative talkers, get away with these hate-filled on-air antics? Of course not.

Just this year alone, months after he proclaimed his support for elitist presidential candidate John Kerry, Imus and his program sidekicks have been embroiled in one horrible flap after another.

The latest involves slimy sidekick Sid Rosenberg, who sang a disgusting tune about pop singer Kylie Minogue's breast cancer disclosure, which led to his firing after a week of public pressure and red-faced execs.

Why did Imus keep him around this long? Look at his track record, according to the Post:

The bad-boy sports-talker underwent rehab earlier this year for an admitted addiction to crack cocaine.

Four years ago, he was suspended for saying tennis stars Venus and Serena Williams were better suited for National Geographic than Playboy.

He has also called female soccer players "juiced-up dykes," claimed "faggots play tennis," and said Palestinians were "stinking animals."

Why wasn't Rosenberg fired ages ago, in face of these incidents? Are advertisers aware of what they're associating with here?

Imus is just as responsible for this as Rosenberg, as he controls the show's content and knows his history. Why shouldn't he be held accountable?

Is anyone asking MSNBC why they still carry this program?

Earlier this year, The Wall Street Journal blew the lid off of Imus's charity, a New Mexico ranch with enough amenities to rival Neverland, where $2.6 million was spent to help just 100 ill children.

Investigators, government and media alike, have wondered whether the small charitable aspect was really just a tax dodge for a personal retreat.

Then, a few weeks ago, a news anchor Imus fired, aired her grievances and got this public response, according to the New York Post:

DON Imus didn't like being called "a cantankerous old fool" by MSNBC's Contessa Brewer on PAGE SIX. Brewer, a former news reader on Imus' show, also said the I-man doesn't know how to relate to "beautiful women."

"With that fat ass she's got, she wouldn't be one of 'em," Imus said on the air Friday. "That skank has to spend three hours with makeup in the morning ... Who's she kidding? . . . Plus, she's dumber than dirt ... Oh, my God, what a pig.

But I was willing to cut her some slack and not say anything, you know, until - in fact, I didn't say anything . . . That's why they have those big double-doors there at MSNBC, you know, so they can get her fat ass in makeup."

An MSNBC spokesman said: "Contessa Brewer is a valued and respected employee. While Don Imus' humor is often brilliant and provocative, we believe that this morning's comments about Contessa went over the line. We have expressed our displeasure to Don."

It isn't just about hate-filled controversies, there's a competency factor, as well. Aside from the fact it's hard to understand what he's mumbling most of the time, he's become politically confused, moving increasingly into the liberal camp.

During last year's campaign, Imus repeatedly proclaimed his support for Kerry, but when interviewing him, had a hard time justifying his stance, in the face of the latter's inconsistent answers.

Mel Karmazin, now head of SIRIUS, was asked yesterday, at the company's annual meeting, about the possibility of hiring Imus for the sat broadcaster and gave this response, according to CBS Marketwatch:

The only way the company would pursue another high-profile radio personality -- such as Don Imus, whom he was asked about at the meeting -- would be if that person would help Sirius reach cash-flow profitability sooner than it anticipated.

"Imus, if he was available, would be [great], but it comes down to the math. He's very greedy," Karmazin said, eliciting a wave of laughter from the crowd.

When someone with Karmazin's experience and expertise, doesn't see the financial justification for fossil radio in his increasingly popular new medium, why do broadcast stations still need this jerk?


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: anusinthemorning; donimus; msnbc; radioequalizer; talkradio

1 posted on 05/26/2005 12:20:10 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

Imus and Stern together again... awwwwwwwww.


2 posted on 05/26/2005 12:33:25 AM PDT by cyborg (tagline under construction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

Sorry, but I thought this was funny: "That's why they have those big double-doors there at MSNBC, you know, so they can get her fat ass in makeup."

BTW, I don't know the gal he's talking about, so it's nothing personal here.

Myself, I used to be so skinny that a friend of mine said he was going to cut out a piece of screen to go over the bathtub drain so that I wouldn't go down the drain when I took a shower. I thought that was funny, too.


3 posted on 05/26/2005 12:34:31 AM PDT by JudyB1938 ("A paranoid schizophrenic is somebody who just found out what's going on." - Wm S. Burroughs, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

Imus is the biggest slut in all of broadcasting.


4 posted on 05/26/2005 12:42:42 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

Somebody should tell Imus that Demosthenes took the pebbles out of his mouth when speaking to the public.


5 posted on 05/26/2005 1:29:22 AM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
He has also called female soccer players "juiced-up dykes," claimed "faggots play tennis," and said Palestinians were "stinking animals."

That's seems pretty accurate. What's the problem here guys? I don't catch his show, but looks like the primary problem is that he's not PC enough. So what?
6 posted on 05/26/2005 1:41:33 AM PDT by Jaysun (No matter how hot she is, some man, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
I listened to Imus for a short time a few yrs ago only because there was nothing else on in my area to listen to on my way to work. One thing I remember was the way his sidekick would go into uncontrolled hysterics over the slightest attempt at humor by Imus. Huge, long belly laughs over things that wouldn't even get a chuckle out of anyone. It was so completely phony. Obviously, bought and paid for. But here's Imus thinking he's fooling everyone by buying a laughing hyena as a sidekick. I couldn't take it for long and gave up after just a week or so. It gave me the impression that Imus couldn't really get any laughs on his own and needed to buy a human laugh track.

Imus isn't all that sharp or funny is he?
7 posted on 05/26/2005 2:02:45 AM PDT by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
Imus is just a guy that has gone through a lot of changes
in the last few years and is trying to find his way. I
have hope that he will get well and stay well because when
he is well, I agree with him a lot but there I am sure will
always issues that I could never agree with him on.

I hear a lot of hate. I know something about hate and if
there were ever a case where it was justified it would be
my case. I will not bore you with the details but if you
must know, I don't mind telling it and you can contact me.

Point is that after four or five years of hate I found that
I hurt no one but myself. If you think that somehow you are
hurting Imus with it you are mistaken.

Just don't listen to him if he upsets you like that.

And yes, a lot of people have the same reaction to Rush.
There hate is also misplaced!
8 posted on 05/26/2005 3:23:26 AM PDT by cleo1939
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

Imus is a pissant. Occasionally he is mildly amusing, but his constant suck-up to most libs and put-down of anything conservative assures I won't buy anything he sells. He's been in New York too long.


9 posted on 05/26/2005 4:25:12 AM PDT by BamaAndy (The democratic party sucks their own lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cleo1939

Well, actually I haven't listened to him in years; the column was by Brian Maloney of Radio Equalizer. I found some things interesting--hadn't known the WSJ had exposed the Imus ranch, etc.

In Boston, sports talker WEEI used to run him in the morning but decided to dump him (low ratings) and put on their own team of sportscaster John Dennis and sportwriter Gerry
Callahan (friends of the Farrelly Bros.--have done cameos in their films). The ratings shot up. Imus moved to WTKK
(which also runs the gamut from Mike Borenickle to
Jay Severin, Hannity, and Ingraham)


10 posted on 05/26/2005 9:47:47 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

more on the Rosenberg firing:

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/story/312621p-267443c.html


11 posted on 05/26/2005 10:33:46 AM PDT by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio
The decision to ax Rosenberg resulted from a cruel comment he made last Wednesday about singer Kylie Minogue's battle with breast cancer. Rosenberg speculated on how Minogue would look after undergoing chemotherapy and surgery.
12 posted on 05/26/2005 8:27:33 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

Just another Excuse for Sharpton & Jackson to get some uncalled for publicity & make a mountain out of a molehill again & were sick & tired of it.....Don Imus went on the today show this morning & said what about some Rap Music lyrics?.....He said if I can’t use it neither can you!...Imus is absolutely right & I stand behind him 100%....Would U want your 5 year old listening to some of that Rap garbage?...I don’t think so so,so Sharpton & Jackson shut the hell up & gripe when U have a leg to stand on!


13 posted on 04/10/2007 7:51:11 AM PDT by roadreeler57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson