Posted on 03/23/2005 10:54:06 AM PST by Avoiding_Sulla
Typical agent of the Death Cults: any convicted killer.
Not an agent of the Death Cults: a disabled woman unable to speak for herself; for whom a former family member is assigned as guardian by the court, a guardian who aims to kill her; loving family members prevented by the courts from protecting her.
Please. Please. Please. Would some please make a similar listing that would make clear “Who is a Target for the Death Cults?†Describe how that targeting is incrementally being institutionaled in America. Netherlanders, here we come.
<sarcasm>
I cannot currently think of a good example that a majority of Americans can't be misled into believing isn't such a target. </sarcasm>
--Despair
This is not the first time that Pascal Fervor argued in favor of Terri's life. But it is the first one written by Despair.
I can't believe this is happening. If any one in New Orleans needs another man to accompany them to Florida, please let me know. How many armed men would it take to remove Terri from the hospital she is in. Who would oppose us, Jeb Bush, not likely.
The gloves have been taken off a long time ago, it's time we did the same. We have men fighting and dying to protect us from enemies abroad, what sacrifice will we be called upon to make to protect the most innocent from the enemies among us at home.
This is an assault on the sanctity of life. To not respond by any means necessary to this abomination of justice, is a shame on us all. If we allow this women to be executed by the culture of death, then God will forsake us all, as we have forsaken His helpless child.
This is a test of whether there is any Godliness left in America.
Why are the liberals celebrating in victory?
Are you sure it's only liberals?
The institutions are firmly in place to protect those who are convicted of murder, no matter how thoroughly certain it is that those condemned are fully immersed in the culture of death.
But Terri Shiavo is granted no hearing no matter how many reports of misconduct have gone excluded from a hearing, no matter how many inconsistencies in the actions and testimony of the principals left officially in charge of her care.
Our courts have given institutional protection to a handful of questionable characters, preventing the obviously most loving members of the innocent victim from coming to her aid.
How can conservatives I've argued with personally, and some others all over be thinking first of smaller, albeit important principles, such as economic consequences?
Why isn't the *Death Cultivation collection still intact?
Why was this editorial, with its singularly unique perspective about the Death Cults joy over the way this poor woman's case has been booted -- since the Death Cultists' viewpoint has been avoided by MSM outlets -- removed from the editorial forum?
The collective institutionalization of death ideology seems to have permeated much deeper and faster even at the common-man level of society than even I, however pessimistically tilting, thought possible.
And the newsreader, from whatever network Salem broadcasting was using, I heard her refer to the end of "the Shiavo right to death case," or nearing the end, or some other phrase equally chilling.
I wish to point out something else here.
Their framing this as a "Right to Death" instead of a "Right to Live" case informs me clearly what's in the heads of the heads of those networks. I said heads of the heads because it can't be in their hearts; they'd need one first.
The Agents of Death can hardly wait.
Oh, if you want to shudder some more, go and read C.S.Lewis' That Hideous Strength and be very sure these monsters know how they mislead the public and know very well where they want to lead us.
Near the end of the essay that started this thread is the line:
Bump.
Thanks FS. I'm searching for something that Theodore R. said some time ago that strikes me deeply now. Watch for it.
A small, framed note of it, is on the wall in our offices. I'm going to write up the whole of the story.
Soon we will need no-kill human hospitals similar to the no-kill animal shelters.
Of course, if/when we get national health care this will become irrelevant. Hospitals will forced to participate or close. Then the killing mills will operate unrestrained.
The government will have complete power as to whether you live or die.
It's your show.
You happened to coin a word back in 2003 which struck me at the time, but which only recently I recalled and searched for and found:
Many of the critics considered the scene, and the movie itself, too sentimental.
The line which Kingsley delivered so movingly was: "Schindler's list means life." And movie-goers and Hollywood loved it.
And now we have the "Anti-Schindler's List" of one.
And the love and sentimentality of the Schindler's for their daughter, along with the compassion of so many American's for their plight, is considered beneath contempt by the elites. The legal profession, and the MSM liars, and most of Hollywood. Oh there are a few noted exceptions in Hollywood, but sadly neither Steven Spielberg nor Liam Niessen nor Ben Kingsley are among them.
Terri has no Ben Kingsley to arouse the public with: "The Anti-Schindler List means Death."
My friends. Tell those who scoff at your efforts that that list contains only one name today.
Tell them, in the words of another, earlier benchmark movie, to "sleep well my droogies."
Yet I'm sure I'll be the one called twisted for suggesting it.
In a world where death is worshipped and innocent human life is no longer the sacred vessel it has traditionally, morally, been considered, I'm willing to let the death cultists and their symps call me twisted.
Do you see where this speech fits here? I recall it's most famous lines applauding the man who tries. Is there more that you feel is appropriate?
I had thought that you were thinking of the "man in the arena," as it may now appy to Jeb Bush.
Read this about a month ago at Clayton Cramer's Blog:
Just heard it again: "Terri Schiavo's right to die case."
Thank you, sir.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.