Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Death Knell for FreeRepublic?(Banned Sierratimes Forum Poster Comments)
Sagebrush Saloon, Red Hot Chili Peppers, Sierra Times (www.sierratimes.com) ^ | 26 Feb. 2005 | Henrietta Bowman

Posted on 03/22/2005 2:23:38 AM PST by tadowe

Edited on 03/22/2005 5:20:14 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-197 next last
To: tadowe; Conspiracy Guy; MeekOneGOP

If ANYONE needed an ANMR.....


81 posted on 03/22/2005 7:45:43 AM PST by Hi Heels (Now Andy, I ain't got time for them trivial trivialities...Barney Fife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
"There are many of us who have been critical of Bush at various times, and Jim has not banned us."

I'm with you.

82 posted on 03/22/2005 7:48:03 AM PST by ex-snook (Exporting jobs and the money to buy America is lose-lose..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tadowe
Most of the comments I see in this thread are defenses of FR, and from those who mistakenly think I was attacking this site (FR).

Amazing, it's it? I doubt any of them actually read your post (#1).

83 posted on 03/22/2005 7:55:13 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels

Actually tadowe is being misunderstood.


84 posted on 03/22/2005 8:01:41 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Okay, you evolved. I was created. Get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

Comment #85 Removed by Moderator

To: Allosaurs_r_us
LOL!

86 posted on 03/22/2005 8:05:16 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: tadowe

I think it's safe to say the Sierra Times is full of nutjob conspiracy theorists, and thus, no need to worry about being banned from there. In fact, if I were, I'd take it as a badge of honor.

I'd never been there before, so, looking around, the first thread I read was about 9/11, and how it was an "inside job". In five minutes I not only came across a thread that claimed 9/11 was an inside job by "neocons and possibly with Mossad help", I came across such a thread that wasn't posted today, or yesterday, but a YEAR ago, and was still there! (not pulled) Indeed, many of the posts weren't critical of the original at all! LOL

Um, thanks, but no thanks. If that's an indication of what the "group think" is there, then, well if I were you tadowe, I wouldn't be worried at all about the hypocrisy of their banning practices. I'd be happy to be banned from a site like that, and indeed, I believe with opinions like that generally accepted there, I think Henrietta has more to worry about than hyopcritical banning practices!


87 posted on 03/22/2005 8:06:04 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: tadowe

Being critical is one thing...being an assclown about it is a whole other matter.


88 posted on 03/22/2005 8:07:37 AM PST by BureaucratusMaximus ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tadowe; Lazamataz
What discourages me is that this site has as many people claiming to be "conservatives" as apparently ST has on theirs, but who are nothing more than stupid, petty tyrants who *jump* at the chance to insult and revile someone else's opinion, ad hominem. They aren't "conservatives" -- they are closet-socialists who join together collectively to attack for their "team" and not for any abstract, or real, conservatism

Okay, so you were attacking folks on FR with your post.

Back to dying, please.

89 posted on 03/22/2005 8:16:58 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: tadowe; Mad Mammoth

In fairness to Mad Mammoth, your post and first comment were quite confusing. It was hard to tell if you were talking about sierrasux.com or FR from one sentence to the next.

Chill out.


90 posted on 03/22/2005 8:23:24 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Okay, you evolved. I was created. Get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: tadowe; RedBloodedAmerican; Hi Heels; MeekOneGOP

Agreed. Let the zotting begin anew!


91 posted on 03/22/2005 8:25:13 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Okay, you evolved. I was created. Get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: tadowe
Your effort was to nit-pick my use of "indefinite" articles and to blame me for the (mis)understanding of others. You didn't misunderstand what I was trying to say, but you were tacitly supporting the effort of the actual "trolls" who post, ad hominem; in support of their personal attacks.

Are you "insulted" by my comments? That is too bad, but consider the reality that I am not anymore responsible for your "feelings" than I am for the misunderstanding of the others in here who jump to stupid conclusions (not that yours were, btw).

You are making it a little difficult for people defending you here to like you. When somebody "nit-picks" your use of indefinite articles as a means of trying to clear up misunderstandings and offer you friendly and constructive advice on how to prevent future misunderstanding, that really doesn't call for the type of responses you have directed to this and similar posters.

You asserted that you are not responsible for the "misunderstanding of the others in here who jump to stupid conclusions." While that is true, one of the qualities of a good writer is that he takes responsibility for preventing misunderstandings of the reader. In other words, a good writer makes a conscious effort to ensure that his words are clear and his intent is clearly communicated. A careful reading of your original post would indicate you were criticizing the other site's hypocrisy and not FR. However, your intent would have been clearer had you been a bit more specific in who you were talking about. As it was written, it is easy to see how readers misunderstood -- a result of their lazy reading and your lazy writing.

As for your contention that the people who jumped into this thread with their jpegs and comments are the real "trolls", most of these posters have well established their credentials as conservatives and they enjoy identifying and ridiculing the trolls who attempt to register on FR to post their idiotic and disruptive comments. You got caught up in their enthusiasm when a few people misinterpreted your post. Learn from it and work on using your writing skills to communicate more clearly when you post, and you will probably make some good friends.

92 posted on 03/22/2005 8:25:34 AM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Excellent suggestion:

"Can't we just have a FORM for this crap?"

I, (fill in the blank) was a Freeper and or lurker (for many, many years before I finally signed up), but I ceased posting when Freerepublic.com founder Jim Robinson first began censoring and banning members for (fill in the blank).

Plus:

I was a life long Republican until the evil and dumb GW became president. I quit being a Republican when GW did or allowed this __________________________ to happen.

Maybe Jim can have John Rob create a special "Losers in Life" section, where the whining axis of losers can post these forms.

93 posted on 03/22/2005 8:29:50 AM PST by Grampa Dave (The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 4 decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: tadowe

I went over and read the thread..at least a page or two..You were banned there and are unhappy...

Free Republic has been declared over by many sites...There is room for many many voices and I am thrilled people have many outlets. Freedom of speech does not exist on
any forum but the one you personally own.

I remember when we had a long freepathon and another site was gleeful,FR was over..ST seems to indiate short ones are indicative of a takeover by dark forces..FR is over..

I can only keep up with FR and do not visit other sites except for entertainment purposes...Thanks for the entertainment.


94 posted on 03/22/2005 8:34:23 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tadowe


95 posted on 03/22/2005 8:38:11 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels
If ANYONE needed an ANMR.....

LOL! Just posted it to him. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^


96 posted on 03/22/2005 8:39:05 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: tadowe
Here, I'll explain again. . .

Oh goody. This ought to be good.

I'm not defending the FR -- I am commenting on the hypocrisy and idiocy of the moderator of ST, and its owner who supports such stupidity. . .


We don't give a good g-ddamn about the moderator of ST, and thank you for confirming that you're not defending FR either.

"I am the 'example' of the Sierratimes being hypocritical in banning a poster...blah-blah-blah"

Hey tadpole?

We don't care. It appears now that your whole motivation for beginning this thread was not to point out 'hypocrisy' either at ST, FR, or anywhere else, it wasn't (obviously due to your own admission) to 'defend FR', it was for the purpose of getting some attention, because 'tadpole need love, wahhhhhhh, tadpole gets no love!!' (sniff! sniff!)

Go away you egotistical cretin, you've got nothing to say of any importance whatsoever. And as other posters have pointed out to you, re-read post 45, and when you're done with that?

Post 65 for sure. That's you bubba.
97 posted on 03/22/2005 8:39:25 AM PST by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

From my experience, people have been banned at other members request, or demand.(strong word). Some things are inappropriate and not germain to what Freerepublic.com is all about. As with polite company, you respect each others feelings and personal beliefs. We are supposed to civilized here.

Somethings I do not agree with, but we must all treat each other with respect.


98 posted on 03/22/2005 8:41:40 AM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tadowe

bump for later reading


99 posted on 03/22/2005 8:44:00 AM PST by Kevin OMalley (No, not Freeper#95235, Freeper #1165: Charter member, What Was My Login Club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tadowe; Darksheare; meowmeow; Constitution Day; 4mycountry; Poohbah; Grampa Dave; ...

Click the pick

Click the pic!


100 posted on 03/22/2005 8:52:11 AM PST by Zavien Doombringer (Have you gotten your Viking Kittie Patch today? http://www.visualops.com/patch.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-197 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson