Posted on 03/20/2005 12:34:28 PM PST by wagglebee
He really nails it here!
A very well written and supported piece by Mr. Sajak and, frankly, I was surprised at the quality what with my preconceived notions about Hollywood types that I've obtained from the subtle bias of the MSM. The phrase above sums it up neatly IMO.
Is it possible that Pat Sajak has been out there writing articles like this for a long time, and I've only recently seen them?
I'm starting to really love this guy!
I'm a pro-life atheist, and it certainly bothers me when the MSM does this. But it's not only the MSM that's doing it. Some here on FR use the phrase "religious right" as an epithet also.
Pat is being too kind by thinking this stereotyping is just some sort of mind-meld that happens by chance in newsrooms. Remember when Reuters directed their reporters not to use the term "terrorist"? They just made the mistake of putting that directive in writing.
Sajak has been posting conservative pieces for a while now, and it's all pretty much on point and very well written. I had always just assumed he was just another Hollyweird wacko, but he isn't.
From what I recall, he's conservative, but unlike his liberal counterparts he is a professional and doesn't wear his allegiances on his sleeve.
Also interesting, if you didn't know, is http://www.patsajak.com/bio.htm
"In 1968, Pat left Columbia after only three years, joined the U.S. Army, and was promptly sent to Vietnam. After a few months as a finance clerk, he was transferred into Armed Forces Radio and given the morning show on AFVN in Saigon where he yelled, “Good Morning, Vietnam!” for a year and a half. He finished his military career at the Pentagon in 1970."
He apparently couldn't find a job anywhere in media for quite a while after he got out. Wonder if it had anything to do with his politics?
The media are SO biased about this issue. I've lost count of how many times they've said that Terri S. is "brain dead," or "in a vegetative state." She is neither. She is brain damaged, which is not the same thing.
The media are SO biased about this issue. I've lost count of how many times they've said that Terri S. is "brain dead," or "in a vegetative state." She is neither. She is brain damaged, which is not the same thing.
The media are so biased about this issue. I've lost count of how many times they've said that Terri S. is "brain dead," or "in a vegetative state." She is neither. She is brain damaged, which is not the same thing.
Corrected tagline.
IMO, I wouldn't want to be in that state but I respect her parents wishes and don't think she ought to be sentenced to death.
It's all this extraneous bull that has made this case so maddening. The parents accusing the husband of trying to murder her.....it's looking for someone to blame for the tragedy and serves no purpose at all at this point in time.
Stick to whether it is right to take away the feeding tube......
Pat Sajak is a cogent conservative wordsmith and pundit IMHO.
I watched Robert Wexler this morning saying that Terri wanted to die and it was wrong of us not to grant her wishes. If Mr. Wexler and all the other dims really believed what they were saying then why in the world are people like this animal that killed Jessica Lunsford being kept on a "suicide watch" and not allowed to kill himself? It sure would save us a lot of tax dollars!
yeah,...me too,...make sure to watch "The Wheel..",...keep his ratings up
bump for Pat Sajak
Atheist Left Wing scares me more.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.