1 posted on
03/17/2005 1:55:21 PM PST by
lowbridge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: lowbridge
2 posted on
03/17/2005 1:56:52 PM PST by
biblewonk
(Neither was the man created for woman but the woman for the man.)
To: lowbridge
This is the result of losing your moral compass.
3 posted on
03/17/2005 1:56:55 PM PST by
ladtx
( "Remember your regiment and follow your officers." Captain Charles May, 2d Dragoons, 9 May 1846)
To: lowbridge
And they make fun of Mississippi.
To: lowbridge
To: lowbridge
What a bunch of sick freaks.
To: lowbridge
A little bit of inbreeding might raise the IQ at DU.
To: lowbridge
um wow - this is what happens. I don't even have any words for this...but we all saw it heading this direction, didn't we? It's only going to get worse so git yer boots on, it's gonna be a bumpy ride!!
8 posted on
03/17/2005 1:59:52 PM PST by
Rushgrrl
(~brought to you from the illegal-rich state of California~)
To: lowbridge
WooooHooooo I can finally marry my dog by DUmmie reasoning.
9 posted on
03/17/2005 2:00:19 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
To: lowbridge
To: lowbridge
so, which of the DUmmies will be the first to marry his/her 3 children, 2 uncles, father, dog and cat? what a bunch of sickos... /sigh
11 posted on
03/17/2005 2:01:25 PM PST by
William of Orange
(Liberalism: killing babies good, killing criminals bad...)
To: lowbridge; PJ-Comix
You sure this isn't a LOUSY FREEPER TROLL trying to get the DUmmies on record as a logical extension of their pro-gay-marriage positions? Otherwise, this guy is dumb, even for a DUmmie, for stating this where it can be seen in public.
PJ -- do we have a DUFU candidate here?
12 posted on
03/17/2005 2:01:39 PM PST by
kevkrom
(If people are free to do as they wish, they are almost certain not to do as Utopian planners wish)
To: lowbridge
I agree completely with this genius DU deep thinker. Heck, why I also marry my beloved sheep, Dolly, with whom I have had a caring and sexual relationship. AND, my friend Osama wants to legally marry wives number two, three, and four.
Who are these evil Republicans to stand in the way of true love???
13 posted on
03/17/2005 2:02:19 PM PST by
FormerACLUmember
(Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
To: lowbridge
Almost all of the rights and responsibilities of marriage are economic or legal in nature and not sexual. "Right of consortium" is one of the few I can think of that are sexual in nature. Almost all of the rights and responsibilities of marriage deal with children: the results of the sexual nature of the relationship.
15 posted on
03/17/2005 2:03:55 PM PST by
The_Victor
(Calvin: "Do tigers wear pajamas?", Hobbes: "Truth is we never take them off.")
To: lowbridge
It seems outrageous but this is the result of redifining marriage so that it is only about "benefits".
Quite frankly, if civil unions come into existence, they should be open to any multiple people who want to care for one another.
They shouldn't come into existence at all! But there isn't any rational reason to discriminate, not when you've eliminated all moral weight.
To: lowbridge
I'd marry my cousin if she'd have me.
Sigh!
21 posted on
03/17/2005 2:14:08 PM PST by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: little jeremiah; DirtyHarryY2K; EdReform
slippery slope sliding splendidly south
To: lowbridge
If I didn't know any better this moron is advocating polygamy and sodomy, something that moron is probably "dabbling in".
31 posted on
03/17/2005 2:20:54 PM PST by
BigSkyFreeper
(You have a //cuckoo// God given right //Yeeeahrgh!!// to be an //Hello?// atheist)
To: lowbridge
Those DUmmies give me a headache.
35 posted on
03/17/2005 2:26:16 PM PST by
Dashing Dasher
(Your charms have not gone unnoticed by all the angels.)
To: lowbridge
Come to think of it, why can't ANYTHING be legal and allowable? After all, somewhere in the world is someone who wants to do something - let it ALL be legal. No rules at all, ever - isn't that what every 12 year old would like?
39 posted on
03/17/2005 2:27:56 PM PST by
little jeremiah
(Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it)
To: lowbridge
Civil Unions or so-called "gay marriage" are pitiful substitutes for some very real structures humanity has developed in the past.
For example, there's the "family", the "extended family", the "clan", and the "tribe".
We might be well-served if we strengthened the extended family and the clan, to say nothing of "tribe".
Note that the US Constitution does recognize "tribe" as a quite legitimate human gathering, although for bizarre reasons, US law does not!
44 posted on
03/17/2005 2:31:10 PM PST by
muawiyah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson