1 posted on
02/28/2005 4:02:48 PM PST by
Diago
To: Dan from Michigan; Still Thinking; billsux; quietolong
2 posted on
02/28/2005 4:05:25 PM PST by
Diago
To: Diago
3 posted on
02/28/2005 4:06:28 PM PST by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: Diago
The blame for drunk driving belongs with drunk drivers. Not GM or any other maker of automobiles.
4 posted on
02/28/2005 4:08:07 PM PST by
Alonzo
To: Diago
This is simply another case of "industrial activism" when groups like NOW, the NEA, most labor unions and others outlive their usefulness, have accomplished their original charter and goals and are desperately seeking some reason for continued existence to justify the salaries they are being paid. They all ultimately turn to extremism beyond reason. Government typically employs a device called a 'sunset' clause to deal with this. The problem in the private sector is there is not a way to get these people to shut up and admit they have outlived their usefulness.
7 posted on
02/28/2005 4:09:35 PM PST by
Cornpone
(Aging Warrior -- Aim High -- Who Dares Wins)
To: Diago
I'm a pround memeber of DAMM (Drunks Against Mad Mothers).
Series-usly though, most driving impaired T/Cs are caused by those with prior DUIs and have repeatedly been arrested and then released via the judicial system.
The average Joe that has three beers before coming home from work is not a significant factor.
8 posted on
02/28/2005 4:11:34 PM PST by
greydog
To: Diago
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
