Skip to comments.
Dr. Rice Enters the Matrix (Photo)
Blaster's Blog ^
| 2/23/05
| Blaster
Posted on 02/24/2005 12:12:37 PM PST by finnman69
I pick up today's WaPo out of the snow, and this was the front page image:
Click for bigger.
I don't think that anyone, anywhere, could ask for better imagery. Just look at the placement it got. Even more interesting, there is not a story about the Secretary of State on the front page.
Applauding soldiers, the American flag, stylish in all black - those boots are made for walking, no doubt. I know the editorial board over at the Post loved General Powell, but he never got anything like this.
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: andwhenshepasses; beautiful; beesknees; catspajamas; condoleezzarice; dazzler; diehugochavez; dreamy; dropdead; eatinouttaherhand; euvisit; filmstar; girlfromfoggybottom; glamourgirl; gorgeous; heygoodlookin; hubbahubba; lady; looker; mysterylady; powerlady; rice; secretaryofbabes; star; starpower; stopstraffic; stylish; whoa; whoohoo; whosthatgirl; whosthatlady; wiesbaden; wow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-150 next last
To: Howlin
Because I don't want to waste my time on you. Period. Perhaps you are not well armed and can't explain the reason for your fantasy.
81
posted on
02/24/2005 1:08:07 PM PST
by
eskimo
To: Palladin
It's just the political reality...
82
posted on
02/24/2005 1:09:24 PM PST
by
advance_copy
(Stand for life, or nothing at all)
To: Guillermo
Why would anyone who isn't a Marxist belong to a Marxist organization? Seems kind of weird to me...
My point, exactly.
83
posted on
02/24/2005 1:09:43 PM PST
by
eskimo
To: Bones75
Don't underestimate the power of them "female president" aspect... Imagine the Dems trying to trash the character of the potential first black female president
Just great, affirmative action for GOP nominations. All you are going to do is demoralize a big part of the conservative base. At the same time, the "female president" aspect will energize DUmbocRAT voters. This Condi '08 business is political suicide for the GOP.
84
posted on
02/24/2005 1:12:36 PM PST
by
advance_copy
(Stand for life, or nothing at all)
To: eskimo
Well, no, you're point was "I don't know if she's a Marxist."
I highly doubt she's a Marxist.
So, our points are not the same.
And, anyone who thinks Condoleeza Rice is a Marxist is a bonafide WACKJOB!
85
posted on
02/24/2005 1:13:38 PM PST
by
Guillermo
("Now how can a Puerto Rican lose a fly ball in the sun?' - Harry Caray)
To: Pyro7480
That's exactly what I was thinking.
86
posted on
02/24/2005 1:17:31 PM PST
by
GOP_Proud
(Those who proclaim tolerance have the least for my views.)
To: Guillermo
Well, no, you're point was "I don't know if she's a Marxist." Well she could just be stupid. If not that then explain why other than a Marxist would belong to a Marxist organization.
87
posted on
02/24/2005 1:18:44 PM PST
by
eskimo
To: eskimo
Keep telling yourself that and maybe you'll feel important.
88
posted on
02/24/2005 1:19:15 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
To: Howlin
Keep telling yourself that and maybe you'll feel important. Guess you could not think of anything rational to say after being expose as history denier.
89
posted on
02/24/2005 1:22:42 PM PST
by
eskimo
To: eskimo
Yeah, that's it, she's stupid.
I refuse to discuss the Secretary of State with one who implies she's a Stupid Marxist. That's hardly a solid premise.
I wish I was as stupid as she.
90
posted on
02/24/2005 1:25:07 PM PST
by
Guillermo
("Now how can a Puerto Rican lose a fly ball in the sun?' - Harry Caray)
To: eskimo
Do you not understand plain Enlgish? I don't want to discuss it with YOU!
I've sworn off trying to discuss anything with whackos and unappeasbles and malcontents.
Take a hint.
91
posted on
02/24/2005 1:26:27 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
To: advance_copy
It sounds like you are the one with problems with "women candidates."
92
posted on
02/24/2005 1:27:40 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
To: Guillermo
I refuse to discuss the Secretary of State with one who implies she's a Stupid Marxist. That's hardly a solid premise. I simply offered an alternative to the obvious for your consideration.
93
posted on
02/24/2005 1:28:16 PM PST
by
eskimo
To: Bones75
If it's Condi that does it, if it's some as-yet unnamed person who does it, it must be done. Ah, but the "purists" among us will surely disagree.
94
posted on
02/24/2005 1:29:46 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
To: rudypoot
Wow !!!!!!!!!
Absolute Beauty !!!!!
95
posted on
02/24/2005 1:30:04 PM PST
by
jigsaw
(God Bless Our Troops.)
To: eskimo
Sorry, I do not consider her a Stupid Marxist.
I'm sure you can find plenty of people who do at John Birch or maybe even the Libertarian Party.
96
posted on
02/24/2005 1:30:38 PM PST
by
Guillermo
("Now how can a Puerto Rican lose a fly ball in the sun?' - Harry Caray)
To: Howlin
It sounds like you are the one with problems with "women candidates."
I've supported, raised money for, and worked for conservative women candidates. That's not the issue. I have a problem with people pushing a candidate because she's a woman, particularly when it is political suicide for conservatives. Support for nominating Condi in '08 is the functional equivalent of support for Hillary in the general election.
97
posted on
02/24/2005 1:32:22 PM PST
by
advance_copy
(Stand for life, or nothing at all)
To: Howlin
I've sworn off trying to discuss anything with whackos and unappeasbles and malcontents. I too have tried to adhere to a similar principle concerning history deniers, yet; here I am trying to help you understand.
98
posted on
02/24/2005 1:33:38 PM PST
by
eskimo
To: rabidralph
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! Well said, well said....
I was listening to my morning radio show and they played a clip of a senator (T. Kennedy???) talking about Obama....someone asked him a question and he answered "Well, ask Osama Bin Laden, er Osama Obama...yes, ask Osama Obama!" Oh, Teddy.....foot in mouth again!
To: Guillermo
I'm sure you can find plenty of people who do at John Birch or maybe even the Libertarian Party. Well, I guess someone who defends Marxist organizations would not like either one of those.
100
posted on
02/24/2005 1:39:27 PM PST
by
eskimo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-150 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson