Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CALI WOMAN FIGHTING FOR TOPLESS SUNBATHING
Crosswalk ^ | 1.22.2005

Posted on 01/22/2005 5:16:40 PM PST by KMC1

Site Meter

IS THIS THE MEASURE OF EQUALITY?: As it happens, a Ventura California female lawyer is attempting to make the case that the state is discriminating against women.

How so? Because topless sunbathing by women is a criminal misdemeanor - for men it is not.

Additionally Liana Johnsson is arguing against the inclusion of the "topless misdemeanor" in the list of offenses that gets one included on the Megan's List for sex offenders.

In an Orange County case last month a State Appeals Court ruled that anyone convicted of misdemeanor indecent exposure must be added to the list. Orange County public defenders are objecting because of the amount of resources it would require to track every woman who did in fact commit the misdemeanor.

Johnsson has lobbied over 400 members of the bar association at the October gathering trying to spread the word. To underscore her point she showed a two minute video of large breasted men.

The Governor of California - Arnold Schwarzenegger took the all-too-courageous position of declining any comment on the possibility of a state wide legal standard being changed. State law enforcement officials confirmed that there is already a series of beaches where some topless bathing is already "allowed" even though laws forbid it.

Let me say plainly that I think it would be irresponsible for women who get caught sunning with their ties untied to be equated with people in society who molest or rape vulnerable women and children. Adding the sunbathers to "Megan's List" in my opinion is a mistake. However - Johnsson is making a dreadful mistake - especially to her own cause.

It is painfully obvious to me that Ms. Johnsson has fully accepted and in fact become the advocate of the fullest feminist expression. Men and Women are not equal - they are the same.

Feminists don't desire to be treated equally , they wish to be completely interchangable. For women like Ms. Johnsson her greatest wish is not so much to be celebrated as a woman - so much as it is the allowance of all who she comes into contact with to be allowed to lure at her as though she is a sexual object.

And here you find feminism's great lie...in the name of being the same as man - allow women to be reduced to an object of sexual curiousity.

The question is - will Ms. Johnsson ever realize that she is in fact devaluing women instead of celebrating them?


(Excerpt) to read more click here...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: femaleperverts; feminazis; filth; perverts; schwarzenegger; sexoffenders; sleazylawyer; sunbathing; topless
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last
To: 26lemoncharlie

Hope you didn't take offense...I was just trying to joke about your poor syntax. As a former editor, things like missing commas jump out at me and conjure up some funny images. Sorry if you took offense.

Is your first language German? I noted that you capitalized nouns.


101 posted on 01/23/2005 6:26:46 AM PST by Gondring (They can have my Bill of Rights when they pry it from my cold, dead hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Malsua

When I lived in Europe I saw a lot of nudity, after a while it was no big deal. I started changing into my swimsuit by the poolside like everybody else. I wish the US would mature in this area.


102 posted on 01/23/2005 6:31:50 AM PST by gortklattu (As the preacher in Blazing Saddles said "You're on your own.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KMC1

A site that criticizes this public defender:
http://www.geocities.com/theykilledrichard/


103 posted on 01/23/2005 7:16:56 AM PST by Gondring (They can have my Bill of Rights when they pry it from my cold, dead hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Since your comments are missing any clarity in this regard, what exactly do you believe?

Are you saying the scriptures written prior to Jesus coming into the world are invalidated?

Do you believe in Jesus? Do you know what He taught? Do you know what his apostles taught?

"God thinks the naked human form is inappropriate. "

Inappropriate for what? Are you saying God wants everyone to run around naked all of the time?

And what do bacon cheeseburgers have to do with this?
104 posted on 01/23/2005 8:15:07 AM PST by unlearner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

and you just might be right


105 posted on 01/23/2005 8:18:28 AM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: unlearner
Are you saying the scriptures written prior to Jesus coming into the world are invalidated?

Why don't you tell me WHICH are invalidated: Paul solved a marketing problem for Christianty by tossing circumcision overboard. But the temporal leaders of churches have a good deal less standing to pick and choose whether nakedness or pork are more sinful.

106 posted on 01/23/2005 9:37:00 AM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

No I was not a very good typist !!! No offense taken here, I enjoyed you post! I'll try to be more careful with the CAPS!!


107 posted on 01/23/2005 10:11:01 AM PST by 26lemoncharlie (Sit nomen Dómini benedíctum,Ex hoc nunc, et usque in sæculum! per ómnia saecula saeculórum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: eno_
The Law was written to Jews and other people who lived in the nation of Israel.

Circumcision was not thrown overboard. The apostles simply recognized that becoming a believer in Jesus did not require becoming a Jew. Earlier, the followers of Jesus were all essentially Jewish.

Paul did not command Jews to abandon their Jewishness. In fact, I think he circumcised one Jewish convert who had not been circumcised before. (I do not have time to look this up at the moment, so I am going on memory.)

" whether nakedness or pork are more sinful."

This shows you fail to comprehend the basics of interpreting scripture. Neither nakedness nor pork are called sinful. Jesus was naked on the cross. Was He sinful?

Nakedness is a shame. The problem is that nakedness-promoters like you take pride in their shame. This is symptomatic of deeper spiritual problems.

God called His creation "good" including pigs. Does that mean pigs are good for eating? They are not the best thing to eat. Jews are commanded to abstain from certain foods as part of their piety. God gives them special blessings for their obedience.

But these are just red herrings to take your sin out of the spotlight.

The real issue is "What will you do with this man, Jesus, who is called the 'Christ'?"

We do not inherit the kingdom of God by wearing the right things or eating the right foods. God has commanded all men, everywhere to REPENT and BELIEVE the gospel. This message is that Jesus died, was buried and rose from the dead the third day. "Jesus" is the only name give to men by which we can be saved.
108 posted on 01/23/2005 10:18:23 AM PST by unlearner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada
At least ten years ago a girl in Kitchener or Waterloo decided to parade topless down the streets because it was ok for men to do the same. It went to court and needless to say, being Canada and all, it is actually legal for woman to walk around topless in Ontario.

Ten to one it wasn't in January.

109 posted on 01/23/2005 10:28:18 AM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: reg45

If it was, she could be arrested for maintaining an attractive nuisance: YOU COULD PUT SOMEONE'S EYE OUT!


110 posted on 01/23/2005 10:46:10 AM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: reg45

LOL! No, lovely summer day. That was her point...men could be comfortable in the heat with no shirt and she wanted the same "right".


111 posted on 01/23/2005 11:03:35 AM PST by JudyinCanada (Five-fingered Canadian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson