Posted on 12/05/2004 2:50:08 PM PST by Dashing Dasher
Yes, your comments concerning my observations have given us cause to ROTFLOAO. Keep it up. Comic relief is always appreciated, even at the expense of the poster. Perhaps you and your friends can find more 'credible information, that we must be see' at the www.barney.com.
Man, there must be some GOOD drugs out there!
LOL I think I should make it clear that YOU are the poster that's providing the comic relief.
LOL
Thanks for the response. Now it's rather clear. You think just saying things makes them so.
Now I see why the posting of the article at the top of this thread wasn't a problem for you. Who cares if it didn't have a source? Who cares if it didn't provide any information that could be verified? Who cares if it was just the rantings of lunatic on the left? Who cares if it didn't even make sense. That's obviously the high standard you have adopted for yourself. That's the standard you used in your last post.
Well I don't want people coming to a conservative forum and thinking the only reason we object to the article, is because it's viewpoint would be considered anti-conservative. I think it should be discounted for the rubish it is, based on it's unverifiable nature.
I wouldn't have posted that trash here. There are plenty of articles from bonified sources that will suffice for the laughs we need on this forum. If laughs are the most important thing for you, veracity doesn't matter, perhaps you're on the wrong forum.
"Who cares if it didn't have a source? Who cares if it didn't provide any information that could be verified?"
What do you think this link is? All you have to do is point and click. Arn't computers wonderful once you figure them out?
http://www.craigslist.org/eby/pol/51272523.html
Once again...
Now I see why the posting of the article at the top of this thread wasn't a problem for you.
Who cares if it didn't have a source?
Please name the person or news organization that interviewed this individual, checked out his story and posted an article detailing the verified information.
Who cares if it didn't provide any information that could be verified?
Did the original poster of this thread contact anon-51272523@craigslist.org and ask him where he worked? Did he verifty where he worked? Did he see any documents or other proof to verify what this person was claiming to be true, was true? Did that person explain the process that facilitated all this in a rational, provable, believable manner?
Who cares if it was just the rantings of lunatic on the left?
Obviously not you.
What this person seeks to claim, is that republicans had access to the computer software at the highest levels of a number of states, so that they could manipulate the election results. Did this person provide a feasable way for this plan to have been executed?
That's obviously the high standard you have adopted for yourself. That's the standard you used in your last post.
I had checked out the link. Did you? Did you ask one critical question before buying into it hook line and sinker?
You don't even know the name of the person making these charges, yet the article obviously meets your high standards of proof, and you seek to claim it's worthy of repeating.
It isn't.
I did check the link. But the difference between you and I, apparently, is that I didn't actually buy this story "hook line and sinker". DoughtyOne, life is not one dimentional - there are many shades and shapes of things - try not to live it like it is.
LOL, do you even attempt to carry on a coeherent discussion?
I mentioned that the story was not credible, you stated it was good for a laugh.
Again I mention that this article didn't have credible sources, and that we don't want to post stuff here that is not credible, and you respond with a link. What was the link for if you agreed with my assessment?
Now you tell me that you didn't think it was credible, and I shouldn't either.
No, life is not one dimensional, but then you might try to staying in one dimension at a time when discussing an issue.
I don't think I said it wasn't credible. I do think that it's unbelievable. I'm quite certain it wouldn't take much for you to come to the same conclusion. Right?
Darb Lifnem, is that you?!! Not too good of a job on
the fake name. . when you come in tomorrow morning, there'll
be a pink slip on your desk! Wear it, Darb!! How could
you rat us out like this?!!
I don't think I said it wasn't credible. I do think that it's unbelievable. I'm quite certain it wouldn't take much for you to come to the same conclusion. Right?
Perhaps you can re-read my first two posts to this thread. You know, the ones before you began your immitation of a ten year old child.
You may not work with people, or know people who buy into the tripe that was the original post on this thread. I do. Whether sourced or not, they read stuff like this and it reinforces their belief system. The article placed here with a title, isn't identified for what it is.
This article, someone's post to another bulletin board, should not have been placed on the forum. Recognizing that, it could have at least had an adequate disclaimer. Instead this is the note the poster affixed to it.
More insanity... from the tinfoil gang! Many of the moonbats are responding with Impeachment Stories.
This indicates nothing. We refer to bonified news articles in the same manner, with numerous vartiations. It doesn't dismiss the article for what it actually is.
What specific statement appears here to give readers a heads-up that this is not a verified news story, was not sourced properly, and that the original poster wasn't even identified? The fact is that someone in a hurry could come by this thread, read the main post and be gone before they were aware that it had less connection to reality than the average article from the Onion.
That is a disservice to the forum. Whether you wish to acknowledge it or continue to act like an ass, the fact still remains that this should not have been posted here.
About 90% of what you posted to me shouldn't have been either. You know this tripe doesn't belong here. There's nothing informative or necessary about any of it.
This isn't guffaw dot com. Many of us use it to obtain 90% of our news. Would you want hundreds of posts like this piece of crap placed on the forum each day? I wouldn't. I don't want one of them here and I'm not alone.
This has got to be one of the funniest threads ever.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.