Thanks for the response. Now it's rather clear. You think just saying things makes them so.
Now I see why the posting of the article at the top of this thread wasn't a problem for you. Who cares if it didn't have a source? Who cares if it didn't provide any information that could be verified? Who cares if it was just the rantings of lunatic on the left? Who cares if it didn't even make sense. That's obviously the high standard you have adopted for yourself. That's the standard you used in your last post.
Well I don't want people coming to a conservative forum and thinking the only reason we object to the article, is because it's viewpoint would be considered anti-conservative. I think it should be discounted for the rubish it is, based on it's unverifiable nature.
I wouldn't have posted that trash here. There are plenty of articles from bonified sources that will suffice for the laughs we need on this forum. If laughs are the most important thing for you, veracity doesn't matter, perhaps you're on the wrong forum.
"Who cares if it didn't have a source? Who cares if it didn't provide any information that could be verified?"
What do you think this link is? All you have to do is point and click. Arn't computers wonderful once you figure them out?
http://www.craigslist.org/eby/pol/51272523.html