Once again...
Now I see why the posting of the article at the top of this thread wasn't a problem for you.
Who cares if it didn't have a source?
Please name the person or news organization that interviewed this individual, checked out his story and posted an article detailing the verified information.
Who cares if it didn't provide any information that could be verified?
Did the original poster of this thread contact anon-51272523@craigslist.org and ask him where he worked? Did he verifty where he worked? Did he see any documents or other proof to verify what this person was claiming to be true, was true? Did that person explain the process that facilitated all this in a rational, provable, believable manner?
Who cares if it was just the rantings of lunatic on the left?
Obviously not you.
What this person seeks to claim, is that republicans had access to the computer software at the highest levels of a number of states, so that they could manipulate the election results. Did this person provide a feasable way for this plan to have been executed?
That's obviously the high standard you have adopted for yourself. That's the standard you used in your last post.
I had checked out the link. Did you? Did you ask one critical question before buying into it hook line and sinker?
You don't even know the name of the person making these charges, yet the article obviously meets your high standards of proof, and you seek to claim it's worthy of repeating.
It isn't.
I did check the link. But the difference between you and I, apparently, is that I didn't actually buy this story "hook line and sinker". DoughtyOne, life is not one dimentional - there are many shades and shapes of things - try not to live it like it is.