Skip to comments.
Evidence Mounts That The Vote May Have Been Hacked (A "progressive" whine ...)
Saturday, November 6, 2004
| Thom Hartmann
Posted on 11/09/2004 10:55:05 AM PST by dixie_conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
To: Terpfen
As if Reno was a threat to Jeb! Yeah, I'm sure she had the Cuban ex-pat vote locked up. The only threat Reno would have been to Jeb would be in an arm-wrestling match...
61
posted on
11/09/2004 11:41:20 AM PST
by
Hard Way
(Razor nothin'. I'm firing up Occam's Chain Saw)
To: Antonello
Pardon me for pointing this out, but the 'crack' demonstrated in the article you linked consisted of physically sitting at the machine ...Yep, I know. If one cannot control physical access then any real security on a PC is moot. It would be interesting to find out how the Tabulator gets the data to tabulate. Via modem? Diskette? CD-R? Of course there would have to be a large conspiracy to compromise the Tabulation PCs in enough places to matter in a national election. That in itself makes the whole scenario extremely unlikely.
62
posted on
11/09/2004 11:42:34 AM PST
by
dixie_conservative
(Warning: premises protected by 12 gauge shotgun wielding conservative.)
To: dixie_conservative
And they had left no tracks whatsoever, Harris said, noting that it would be nearly impossible for the election software or a County election official - to know that the vote database had been altered. Ignoring, of course, the fact that the parties take down independent counts of each precinct in front of the judge of elections and report them to Party HQ for independent tablulation.
How dumb are these people? Have they ever actually participated in an election?
To: dixie_conservative
First rule when doing naughty things: don't get caught.
Hacking the central tabulator would be a certain way of getting caught. Every scanner would have it's own report, printed out before any data ever got sent to the central tabulator where the hack supposedly occurred. Can we say "paper trail"? I guess we have to assume that those 10,000 democrat lawyers are morons for this scenario to play out.
Just silly fiction.
To: faithincowboys
The machines aren't hooked up to a network. Well, actually they are...for a short time several times on Nov. 2nd when they dial up and upload results periodically. An easy matter to intercept and corrupt that data.
65
posted on
11/09/2004 11:51:39 AM PST
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(May the wings of Liberty never lose so much as a feather.)
To: dixie_conservative
OK so what is generally prescribed for hysteria and delusion? I need to make an investment but can't decide which among the pharmaceutical companies has the brightest future...
66
posted on
11/09/2004 11:52:00 AM PST
by
thoughtomator
(The Era of Old Media is over! Long live the Pajamasphere!)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
An easy matter to intercept and corrupt that data. Really? Where is the "in"?
To: dixie_conservative
68
posted on
11/09/2004 12:05:51 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(BIg Government is still a big problem.)
To: dixie_conservative; Admin Moderator
Good grief, yes we have seen this crap before and you know it. Go away newbie, back to du land.
P. S. I have pinged the mods to have this thread deleted.
69
posted on
11/09/2004 12:09:56 PM PST
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
To: AxelPaulsenJr; Admin Moderator
Good grief, yes we have seen this crap before and you know it.No, I did not "know it".
Go away newbie, back to du land.
What is "du land"? Further, what is your problem with me? I've done nothing but post info that bothered me to try to get other FR readers takes on it. Look at my posting history. Is there any evidence in any post I have made that I am something other than a conservative? You are Judge and Jury for my posts? Good grief yourself. :-/
70
posted on
11/09/2004 12:20:01 PM PST
by
dixie_conservative
(Warning: premises protected by 12 gauge shotgun wielding conservative.)
To: BenLurkin
Oh! That hat is FUNNY! :-D
71
posted on
11/09/2004 12:24:46 PM PST
by
dixie_conservative
(Warning: premises protected by 12 gauge shotgun wielding conservative.)
To: AxelPaulsenJr; Admin Moderator
Ah ha! I see by reading your recent posting history you are pretty quick to pass judgement on any "newbie" that posts something you don't like. Ok, I know to ignore you now. Thanks for the heads up.
I also found out by using "Search site" that DU means Democratic Underground. Now that is a sad site indeed. I don't believe I will be reading posts over there very often.
72
posted on
11/09/2004 12:50:33 PM PST
by
dixie_conservative
(Warning: premises protected by 12 gauge shotgun wielding conservative.)
To: VeniVidiVici
Really? Where is the "in"? Not sure. I read an article posted here on FR the weekend before the election about some counties that had testing done by some outside agency for this type of thing and they were able to intercept the data at the time of transmission.
As a result, they were told not to transmit electronically but to hand deliver results until a hardening could be done. Don't know whether they followed this advice or not.
73
posted on
11/09/2004 1:35:24 PM PST
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(May the wings of Liberty never lose so much as a feather.)
To: Red Badger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson