Posted on 10/26/2004 5:14:43 PM PDT by MrConfettiMan
She won't.
She will NEVER, did you hear me, NEVER, EVER, EVER, EVER get confirmed.
Good article, but using "hillary" and "brief(s)" in the title clouds my perception with a foul odor.
I am sure that you have had your share of tin foil hats over the past couple of years. I think you are right that W will win. I am glad you are doing well too.
Kerry is a lazy, arrogant elitist with little real ambition and a very poor work ethic. When he loses, he will simply drift away to the things he was doing. All the others would have used even a losing status to lead a crusade. And any other one would have been a competitor in 2008. Kerry won't.
The other key thing for Hillie is to maintain absolute control of the DNC and it's money and scummy resources. If Kerry is elected, he'll replace McAuliffe and may be smart enough to realize the risks (unlike Bush) that every Clintonista represent. When Kerry loses, McAuliffe and all his lying scumbags stay in place, ready to slime for Hillie in 2008. Her VP, BTW, will be Weaselly Clark.
Don't forget Edwards, that disgusting little turd of a plaintiff's lawyer. If Kerry were elected, Edwards would be working to position himself for 2012, blocking Hillie. But, Edwards was selected as Kerry's running mate solely to be a burden. He adds nothing to a nothing guy and was appointed to help drag Kerry down.
However, portions of the electorate are pretty stupid and the left wing media is pulling out all the stops. So, it may not be as automatic as we believe. That is why I believe that there will be an October surprise leak of something Hillie got out of Kerry's secret FBI file. Don't know what it is but don't be too surprised by some revelation. I personally believe he has been married three times and information on one of the weddings, while not completely secret, has been surpressed.
I posted this last month on FR
"The far left aspect of Kerry will not swing the centrist or moderates that are on the fence of every election. It is no secret that they are the key to winning and the ones who have decided every election of the last century. Even the Dem's made note of this fact upon losing the 2000 election. Their statement then was that they must move toward a centrist position to win the next election. Their statements in 2000 supports the fact that John Kerry was never intended to win. The Democrats conceded the election before the 2004 campaign even started by chosing him.
Just look at this leftwing extremist they are running. He has enough negative aspects from the Vietnam war protest alone to knock him out of contention. I thought from the beginning that the objective was to wait and win in 2008 with two terms into 2016 with Hillary Clinton. There is something about this time frame that is appealing to the D's. If Kerry won the 2004 election it would kill Hillary's chance of running because of Kerry's automatic second term shot. Besides "W" hasn't finished cleaning up the playground yet. j"
I think we have seen the writing on the wall........j
No!
The left will continue to revere anything Clinton, Carter, Kennedy, and now, Kerry; they are the same lineage, the same cult, and the same coven!
It is sad but true that the center and right will have to fight this battle every election, every time the dark side puts forth it's lure; they don't go away, they only lay back and let their allies do the spade work.
>>The best solution to Hillary's political problems is for Kerry to win and appoint her Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
Disagree. Chief Justice doesn't wield enough power for Hillary's tastes.
Excellent job.
For the most part I have been saying what you have said (only no where near as well) for the better part of two years.
Thanks for the kind words, lancer. Good to hear from you, too, my friend.
Hillary? Briefs?
I thought she wore boxers...
>>I am so sick and tired of folks here thinking her thighness is electable.
I never said she was electable. :)
where is the GWB interview part 2 thread?
Agreed. I am sick of the constant undercurrent of Clintons here. They are played out. Even my Dem friends hate Hillary.
>>Exactly how do you know this?
I'm speculating. Just like Hillary did back in 1978 when she turned a trading account containing $1,000 into $100,000 in less than a year trading cattle futures. :)
I don't want to think about it.
Does not matter what Hillary wants...
our MSM wants Bush defeated and he'll
need God Himself to insure he's not
cheated out of a righteous win.
Here is something to think about ... They do want Kerry to win and Hellary will take Dashole's place in the Senate
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
