Posted on 09/22/2004 9:50:23 AM PDT by Evilscott
If Burkett had access to these documents in the past, he would have used them, and obviously he's not sophisticated enough to have produced them. Also, why is the MSM so quiet on trying to find out the true source? Because they know it would lead to the DNC/Kerry kamp! These forgeries surfaced only when Kerry started slipping in the polls!
They took notes from Burkett, then used the WRONG memorandum format to type them up and ship them back to Burkett. Burkett would have known the memos were not good enough, but he had to pass them on anyway, he could not resist!
Looking for a young sophisticated dirty trickster in the Kerry kamp that could have created the memos for Burkett? Try this guy:
Activists who have undergone Ruckus training are to ordinary protestors as a Navy Seal commando is to an ordinary foot soldier. Ruckus graduates have been armed with a huge toolbox of ways to goad police into overreaction, exploit situations, and cause problems for those they target. Ruckus has become the military academy where dozens of leftwing groups send their elite shock troop protestors to learn the skills of waging guerrilla street warfare against capitalism.
One such leftwing activist is Zack Exley, who was trained by and has worked as a "workshop facilitator" for The Ruckus Society.
Since April 2004 Exley has been the Director of Online Communications and Online Organizing for the John Kerry-John Edwards 2004 presidential campaign organization.
Ted Baxter - I mean Dan Rather asked Burkett why he misled them, but never got to the heart of the matter- WHO FORGED THE DOCUMENTS
As amazing as it is to watch, See BS appears willing to ride this faltering airplane right into the ground.
Any thirteen year old with a computer could have produced those memos.
Yes, any 13 year old. But not some crusty old 55yo!
If the Kerry campaign is so inept that they cannot even produce plausible forgeries of 4 pages of notes they are obviously not competant to run the country. And if their minions are so out of control as to endanger their candidates chances in this manner, I draw the same conclusion.
Actually the memos do kind of have Burkett's finger prints on them, since some of the lingo matches Army Reserve stuff not Air Reserve lingo. Burkett is a prime suspect. I suspect someone in the DNC with close ties to Kerry though is the 'unimpeachable source'. Of course, unimpeachable does rule out Clinton.
Actually the memos do kind of have Burkett's finger prints on them, since some of the lingo matches Army Reserve stuff not Air Reserve lingo. Burkett is a prime suspect. I suspect someone in the DNC with close ties to Kerry though is the 'unimpeachable source'. Of course, unimpeachable does rule out Clinton.
What is the "Army lingo"?
Need someone to list the connections between Bob Fertik and Zack Exley.
Anyone?
The most famous "Paper finder" of the day is Hillary. Same pattern. They turned up "unexpectedly"...Voila!!
Nonesense! He's one of the few who is sophisticated enough to have produced them. I have no doubt that Burkett created those forged memos.
It doesn't take any sophistication to type a rather crude document in MS Word. That's baby stuff which Burkett's use of the Internet shows would be well within his capability.
Where Burkett's sophistication comes in is that he is one of the few who would know the names, places, times and events to put into the memos to be able to sucker Mary Mapes.
Lucy is a figment of Burkett's perverted imagination.
Somebody get a search warrant and search Burkett's computer. He probably isn't sophisticated enough to have removed all traces of the memos from his hard drive.
Why would Burkett set up his old friend George Conn to be the fall guy?
Burkett recanted that Conn was the source, after Conn was contacted by the press and denied any knowledge.
After the Conn fingering, Burkett comes up with Lucy Ramirez, whom he said he was trying to protect. But he also states he has no knowledge of whom Lucy Ramirez is!
Why go to the mat to protect an unknown?
Some options:
a) Burkett did it and made up a name. Possible, but he would have done this years ago if he had the sophistication. Also, he knows the Memorandum format is not correct, so he would not have typed that.
b) Conn did it. But Conn is a DoD civil servant and would be fired for getting involved in a campaign, so Burkett changed his story after pleading from Conn not to finger him.
c) Someone else did it. Who would Burkett go to the lengths of defending, even if it meant first pointing the finger at a good friend that could lose a job? Only answer is the Kerry campaign. He cares more about unseating Bush than anything else, and would not finger the Kerry camp since he knows it would crush Kerry.
So who in the Kerry camp/DNC has Burkett been working with over the years? Look to Bob Ferkit and Zack Exley.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.