Depends What The Meaning of Here Is.

LifeTrek - Honing the Passage ^ | September 12, 2004 | David K. Kittel

[LifeTrek]

From Newsmax.com comes this from Terry McAulffe - and based on the McAulffe/Clinton defination of truth this could mean that the person had gone home for the day, think about it - depends on what the meaning of here is.

"No one here at the Democratic National Committee had anything at all to do with any of those documents," McAuliffe told reporters. "I can unequivocally speak for the Kerry for President Campaign Committee, nor do they have anything to do with these documents. Absolutely not."

DKK

[LifeTrek]

I still deny typing the memo's despite the fact that I have never been able to change the defaults in my Word program and as you can see if you have read any of this blog at length I can't even get the font right in most posts - and my spelling and grammar is atrocious but so be it - that is part of the brain fog at least that is my story!
DKK

[Boundless]

It all depends on how you define "define".
And did McAwful actually claim to be speaking English?
In Demlish, these apparent sentences mean something
completely different.

In any event, presuming they are English ...

> "No one here at the Democratic National Committee had
> anything at all to do with any of those documents,"
> McAuliffe told reporters. "I can unequivocally speak
> for the Kerry for President Campaign Committee, nor
> do they have anything to do with these documents.
> Absolutely not."

This is a message addressed to Dan Rather & CBS.

Translation: Everyone knows CBS got these from Kerry's
people, who got them from the DNC. But if CBS tries to
blame us, we're gonna stonewall just like CBS is doing.
CBS has to fall on the sword for this one, unless they
want to inflict even more harm on their chosen candidate.
So make your choice Dan, who dies over this fiasco:
Rather&CBS or Kerry?

[LifeTrek]

So right - I have often wondered what language McAulffe was speaking. I can only sound that way with marbles in my mouth - but him and Chris Mattews are pros at it. (humor for goodnes sake!)
DKK

[Robert357]

"No one here at the Democratic National Committee had anything at all to do with any of those documents," McAuliffe told reporters.

Translation = It was a group of us and not a single person at DNC who are responsible for this.

"I can unequivocally speak for the Kerry for President Campaign Committee, nor do they have anything to do with these documents. Absolutely not."

Translation = The Kerry for President Campaign Committee (as it is legally defined in various Federal Election regulations) did not go through a formal endorsement process on these documents as they do in Advertisements (so that you see the I'm John F'n Kerry and I endorse this ad.) Therefore , this is not a product of the Kerry for President Campaign Committee, it may be the work of one or many key people in the Kerry for President Campaign Committee and they may have used their close ties to convince Dan Rather is was necesary to run, but the Committee had nothing to do with the documents as they were created long before we gave them to the Kerry Campaign Committee representatives.

The Dem's are despirate and trying anything and everything and hoping that something may help. I expect them to next pull out the GW Bush drunk driving ticket thing. Maybe Larry Flint will advertise a $1 million reward for any frat pictures of G.W. doing improper things.