Skip to comments.
Berger/Kerry Campaign Intelligence Flap - Could this be Hillary's "In" for the Nomination
7-20-04
| no dems
Posted on 07/20/2004 2:33:53 PM PDT by no dems
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
I'm not really sure that I want this scenario to play out. I think Hill might be more difficult to beat than JFK.
1
posted on
07/20/2004 2:33:57 PM PDT
by
no dems
To: no dems
What I fear is that the Dems will drop Kerry and go with Edwards.
2
posted on
07/20/2004 2:36:12 PM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: no dems
NO! Geez, dya think maybe if Hillary wanted in she'd, oh, I dunno, runin the firckin' primaries?
3
posted on
07/20/2004 2:36:20 PM PDT
by
dangus
To: no dems
Nothing would electrify the Republican base more than another Clinton running for the Presidency.
I think she would also turn off a lot of the more "moderate" Democrats, especially the older ones who would never vote for a woman for President.
To: no dems
"I ACTUALLY KEPT BERGER ON BOARD BEFORE I FIRED HIS @SS."
To: no dems
Ummmm, no. The media won't dwell on it. The Republicans won't pursue it and in two weeks it will be old news. Just like all the other potential scandals we've seen over the last 12 or more years. It there's a Democrat involved there will be no lasting problems (unless you speak out against the Clintons on the floor of the House - see Traficant, Jim).
To: no dems
Well, Kerry says that he just learned of the criminal investigation into his national security advisor yesterday (although it's been going on for 7 months). Nothing to see here, more along. (sarcasm)
7
posted on
07/20/2004 2:37:22 PM PDT
by
PilloryHillary
(johnfkerrysucks.com)
To: no dems
no, she's better off until 08... no point in taking a chance against an incumbent .... of course, it sure would be nice to see her name all over those papers that sandyburglar stole
8
posted on
07/20/2004 2:37:34 PM PDT
by
InvisibleChurch
(I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it)
To: no dems
The Clintons have delivered the first punch designed to make John F*ckin' damaged goods by November. I love how they do it. They're showing him who the real pros are. And you betcha there's more to come... stay tuned.
9
posted on
07/20/2004 2:37:37 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Brilliant
What I fear is that the Dems will drop Kerry and go with Edwards. They'd want someone who wasn't "tainted" so Edwards would probably be SOL.
To: no dems
11
posted on
07/20/2004 2:38:40 PM PDT
by
kAcknor
(That's my version of it anyway....)
To: dangus
The more the public sees of Hillary!, the less they like her. Running through the primaries and into the general election is just too much exposure. She needs to win in a quick sprint at the end.
12
posted on
07/20/2004 2:38:55 PM PDT
by
bondjamesbond
(Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: Brilliant
I was thinking this was s set up by the Clintons.
To: johnfkerrysucks
Well, Kerry says that he just learned of the criminal investigation into his national security advisor yesterday (although it's been going on for 7 months)I just learned of it yesterday. If Nose-Berger never told Kerry, why should Kerry have known? The Bush admin has a lot of patience, and it likes these sorts of time bombs (they just wait for the scandals to go off, or deliberately set them off at the right time)
14
posted on
07/20/2004 2:39:11 PM PDT
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: no dems
The predicate of all this is to seriously believe that the story has legs and that justice will find Sandy Berger.
That's just not a very mature belief.
15
posted on
07/20/2004 2:39:16 PM PDT
by
HitmanLV
(I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
To: no dems
This is a conspiracy theory worthy of Dick Morris.
Face it: Hillary isn't going to run. She is not going to be a candidate.
To: no dems
Hmmm. Maybe Hillary was the leak....?
17
posted on
07/20/2004 2:39:29 PM PDT
by
Not A Snowbird
(Monthly Donors NEVER need tons click "co-ordinating")
To: no dems
18
posted on
07/20/2004 2:39:32 PM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(Must get moose and squirrel ... B. Badanov)
To: no dems
19
posted on
07/20/2004 2:39:40 PM PDT
by
annyokie
(Now with 20% More Infidel!)
To: no dems
Let's see...bad Republicans leak info on Berger (VRWC-type blame). Info looks bad for Kerry. Maybe.
20
posted on
07/20/2004 2:39:56 PM PDT
by
windchime
(Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson