The Constitution clearly says that NO PERSON can be deprived of their life or their liberty without due process.
How can you believe that a baby in the womb is not a person?
The justice's reasoning abilities are as faulty as the reasoning powers of the Schwarzenegger supporters here.
You have an amazing ability to consistently miss the point.
It doesn't matter whether or not it is bad law, only that it is settled law.
The reasoning of anyone who would vote against a decent candidate ensuring the election of a horrible candidate is what is faulty.
You appear to be fixated on this one issue. There are a lot of other issues out there.
And what is so insipid about it is that it is totally moot.
It is like saying you can't support Arnold because he likes waffles for breakfast and you prefer pancakes.
Let me walk you through this slowly.
It is 'settled law' I (at least so you claim) only because people are dumb or immoral enough to give political support to politicians similiar to Arnold Schwarzenegger.
You do know that politicians choose judges, right?
By the way, if it is so 'settled', why are the Democrats beside themselves over judicial appointments?