Skip to comments.
Why I Am Now Behind Arnold
me
Posted on 08/12/2003 9:52:14 AM PDT by DrMartinVonNostrand
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480 ... 761-779 next last
To: Torie
What Arnold thinks about abortion will not change minds about this issue either. No it won't. It will just reinforce the pro-death position.
To: EternalVigilance
McClintock can not stop abortion-no governor can. Perhaps a Republican in California will help elect more pro-life Repubs to congress thus allowing judges to be confirmed. Abortion is not an issue in the California recall.
442
posted on
08/12/2003 9:25:31 PM PDT
by
nyconse
To: EternalVigilance
Let's see if all of a sudden states were given the right to have abortion laws, would all 50 states do so? If not, would one state become the 7-11 of abortions? How about Nevada with legalized prostitution and gambling, think they will outlaw abortion?
And if all 50 states did somehow prohibit abortion, would things go back to the barber shop abortions and those with finances just travel to countries where it is legal? Like any one of over 150 countries? Our neighbor Canada? Over 60% of the world's population lives where abortion is permitted for a wide range of reasons or unrestricted....maybe you should work on the world problem there are a lot more babies to save worldwide than just in the US....we are outsourcing jobs, I guess you want to outsource abortions too, because IMO you won't stop them...
http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/archives/abortww_nr.html http://www.prochoiceactionnetwork-canada.org/civilize.html#canada
To: EternalVigilance
If you lose and a Dem is elected what have you gained? If anything you have hurt the pro-life effort which is very important to you and to me.
444
posted on
08/12/2003 9:27:00 PM PDT
by
nyconse
To: EternalVigilance
But sir, you are 'doing something about it'. You are helping forward it. What part of "CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHT" don't you understand.
Jurists unanimously agree that Roe v. Wade is settled law.
Even "pro-life" judges.
"Pro-life" is just going to have to exist as one option of "pro-choice". No matter who you vote for in any race, it is not going to change that. But I suppose you don't care so long as your vote is registered in heaven...
To: nyconse
Perhaps a Republican in California will help elect more pro-life Repubs to congress thus allowing judges to be confirmed. That is a very big perhaps.
Why would you ever think that a pro-abort is going to do such a thing?
Governors have a tremendous amount of power, especially when it comes time to pick future candidates.
It is silly to believe he will pick people who are not in his image.
To: EternalVigilance
Also, you must have some perspective. Abortion is one issue only in a race where the winner can not effect it one way or the other.
447
posted on
08/12/2003 9:28:22 PM PDT
by
nyconse
To: rolling_stone
And if all 50 states did somehow prohibit abortion, would things go back to the barber shop abortions and those with finances just travel to countries where it is legal?More women die or are seriously injured from botched abortions today in the United States than died or were injured when all states had laws prohibiting abortions. Far, far more women.
448
posted on
08/12/2003 9:29:23 PM PDT
by
Kevin Curry
(Put Justice Janice Rogers Brown on the Supreme Court--NOW)
To: DrMartinVonNostrand
What part of "CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHT" don't you understand. What part of perversion of justice don't you understand?
The Constitution clearly says that NO PERSON can be deprived of their life or their liberty without due process.
How can you believe that a baby in the womb is not a person?
The justice's reasoning abilities are as faulty as the reasoning powers of the Schwarzenegger supporters here.
To: EternalVigilance
No the Senate is almost 50-50. Repubs don't have the votes to end a filibuster. Solution-elect more Repubs!
450
posted on
08/12/2003 9:30:34 PM PDT
by
nyconse
To: nyconse
Abortion is one issue only in a race where the winner can not effect it one way or the other. Wrong.
To: EternalVigilance
Explain to me how electing McClintock would end abortion?
452
posted on
08/12/2003 9:31:48 PM PDT
by
nyconse
To: nyconse
Solution-elect more Repubs! I work towards that end every day.
But electing more spineless liberals does no good; no matter which party label they bear.
To: rolling_stone
Also, abortion were legal in New York before Roe V Wade.
454
posted on
08/12/2003 9:33:42 PM PDT
by
nyconse
To: nyconse
Also in California, per a bill signed by one who subsequently became president. And so it goes.
455
posted on
08/12/2003 9:34:50 PM PDT
by
Torie
To: nyconse
You obviously don't understand the power of the Governorship of the state of California.
It is not just the office itself. It is a bully pulpit. In fact, it is a bully pulpit only exceeded by one other.
The abortion views of the new Governor will impact GOP politics for years to come...setting back the movement, or advancing it.
Personnel is policy.
To: EternalVigilance
He is a Republican-there are far more pro-life Repubs than pro-choice Repubs.
457
posted on
08/12/2003 9:35:10 PM PDT
by
nyconse
To: nyconse
He is a Republican-there are far more pro-life Repubs than pro-choice Repubs. Sometimes you wouldn't know it by the actions of our leaders.
To: Tom Jefferson
McClintock has my vote !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To: Torie
Reagan signed a bill allowing abortion-no your kidding right?
460
posted on
08/12/2003 9:37:34 PM PDT
by
nyconse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480 ... 761-779 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson