Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Men Behaving Badly - Why?
MND ^ | July 15, 2003 | Karl Glasson, Ph.D.

Posted on 07/15/2003 1:45:35 PM PDT by Nick Danger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-291 next last
To: Nick Danger
BUMP for later!...but let me say this, I see your point!
81 posted on 07/17/2003 7:45:40 AM PDT by GrandMoM ("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ta Wee
But of course, men never throw aside Wife 1 for a newer model, do they? ... Why don't you simply be honest and admit you just don't like women?

I'm happily married with three daughters. I stay happily married because I do my share, expect my wife to do hers, and decline to be a doormat for anyone. Among my circle of friends, I do not have anybody who dumped his wife in order to get a "newer model", but have several whose wives dumped them in order to move on to a bigger, better, deal

I've looked at your comments on other threads. The only threads you seems to have any interest in participating in are the ones where you can vent your anger and unhappiness at men, and complain about how badly you were treated by your ex-husband in your own failed marriage (eg, your posts #137, #258, and #259 in Young men are running from marriage )

Come up to the present. I am not your ex-husband. Nobody else here is your ex-husband either. It's time to resume your life and move on. I realize (as you mention in #259 above) that good men may be hard to find -- but you will never find one as long as you have that enormous chip on your shoulder -- the one that whacks any nearby guy across the face every time you turn around

82 posted on 07/17/2003 7:47:26 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Java/C++/Unix/Web Developer looking for next gig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: angelbaby1111
I disagree...it's addiction to pornography. Laugh all you want but a vast majority of males are addicted and it has certainly escalated with all the internet porn. I heard a report once that had 63% of Christian men...including many pastors, are addicted. It's literally killing relationships and lives. By the way, I'm not a feminist...never have been, never will be.

As men find it more difficult to find a healthy sexual outlet in marriage, expect perversions to increase. High divorce rates, working wives who consider sexual relations with their husband a chore instead of a loving part of marriage, and females who choose to work putting off marriage until (too) late in life have all encouraged men to look to look elsewhere for sex. Not to mention that a 2 dimensional image of a woman cannot pick-up the phone and dial 911 with a bogus DV charge.

The growth of porn is not due exclusively to availability, there has to be a demand for it as well.

83 posted on 07/17/2003 7:50:25 AM PDT by disclaimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Ta Wee
I see, anyone who discusses women as a demographic is either gay or their wife is stupid. Well, I'm not gay and my wife can tear you apart with her intellect from what I've seen of your arguments, so I just can't agree with your accusations.

I hope that someday you can put your hatred aside and consider what is best for the Republic and the traditional family where there is a mother and a father present for the children.

84 posted on 07/17/2003 8:08:23 AM PDT by disclaimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Ta Wee
Women, sane ones, do not care for the company of angry 'men' who act as though they would really like to punch them between the eyes.

There is the flaw in your reasoning--there are no 'sane ones'....

85 posted on 07/17/2003 8:17:46 AM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (The Guns of Brixton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: chookter
=>Women, sane ones, do not care for the company of angry 'men' who act as though they would really like to punch them between the eyes.
There is the flaw in your reasoning--there are no 'sane ones'....

But men who want to punch between the eyes are of course, sane.

If women were sane, they would enjoy the pain.
86 posted on 07/17/2003 8:19:24 AM PDT by Ta Wee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Ta Wee
You don't even bother to argue the points raised in the article, thus your case is utterly unconvincing.
87 posted on 07/17/2003 8:19:31 AM PDT by =Intervention= (White devils for Sharpton Central Florida chapter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: =Intervention=
=>You don't even bother to argue the points raised in the article, thus your case is utterly unconvincing.

The whole point was that women are insufferable demons. So, for those with that delusion, I suggest the company of other men so that they might be happy.
88 posted on 07/17/2003 8:21:00 AM PDT by Ta Wee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Ta Wee
If women were sane, they would enjoy the pain.

Hmmmmmmm..... You're freudian slip is showing.

89 posted on 07/17/2003 8:23:25 AM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (The Guns of Brixton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Ta Wee; chookter
chookter: There is the flaw in your reasoning--there are no 'sane ones'....

Now, chookter, you're insulting my wife.

Ta Wee: But men who want to punch between the eyes are of course, sane.
If women were sane, they would enjoy the pain

Why don't you two go off in a corner and have at each other. That is what I think is the definition of hell - only it goes on longer than life on earth.

90 posted on 07/17/2003 8:26:00 AM PDT by disclaimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: chookter

=>If women were sane, they would enjoy the pain.
Hmmmmmmm..... You're freudian slip is showing.

Think again.

Or perhaps you believe that.

91 posted on 07/17/2003 8:27:17 AM PDT by Ta Wee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: disclaimer; Ta Wee
I'm in a bad mood.

--and I'm definitely becoming a misogynist. I tried to fight it, initially, but weight of evidence has overwhelmed me....

I've baby-shaken my inner child to death and have embraced my inner cad.

92 posted on 07/17/2003 8:45:16 AM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (The Guns of Brixton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: nothingnew
We are where we are because of the attitude of eople like you. This writer have spent so much effort articulating a societal problem that affect 50% of the population, and you are simply attempting to make lite of this serious dilemma.
93 posted on 07/17/2003 8:50:38 AM PDT by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ta Wee
"It is interesting that centuries of being chattel, of being considered less than human did not drive western women to crime, violence, and mayhem."

I'd say baby killing is criminal, violent and tends toward mayhem.

94 posted on 07/17/2003 9:08:43 AM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: chookter
I'm in a bad mood.
--and I'm definitely becoming a misogynist. I tried to fight it, initially, but weight of evidence has overwhelmed me....
I've baby-shaken my inner child to death and have embraced my inner cad.

chookter - nowadays it sounds corny and simple to talk about religion and God since for the last 30 years God's teachings (the bible) have been and are rejected by so many around us and in the media and especially the feminists. The key to this man/woman relationship thing is both partners must respect God first, then with that in place, both can respect and love each other regardless of our faults. My wife and I both went through periods in our lives, before we met, where we could look upon the opposite sex with contempt - but we both believed in God and in due time (a long long time) found each other. If you put God first, and trust Him, you will find a woman doing the same and then you will find happiness in marriage. Our society has made this a very hard road to travel to say the least.

Women want the security to know that the man they marry will be there with them and the children for their entire life. That's how it is in God's plan laid out by the bible. When women feel they cannot have this security, when society tries to pattern itself on something other than the ten Commandments, then women will try to use the state to obtain security. That's what we're witnessing today.

95 posted on 07/17/2003 9:21:37 AM PDT by disclaimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

It's a shame that a really fascinating discussion has deteriorated into a food fight because some can't keep their emotions out of it.

What some of us are discussing is the sociological implications of a society where men have been robbed of their incentive to work. You saw this is in the Soviet Union where the state *dictated* what men should do, what crops they would plant, what factory they should report to, etc.

Communism looked great on paper to the social engineers and to the elites who felt unbound by the decrees they dictated to everyone else. They had a solution to men behaving badly - they murdered them. The remaining males were kowtowed into doing what they could to survive. But survival is not the same as excelling and the men increasingly failed to put forth good work, only what they needed to get by. The Soviet Union collapsed from within, as did the communist states of Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, East Germany, etc, because uninspired men rarely excel.

The danger communism posed to the East, feminism now poses to the West - a massive socialist nanny-state government increasingly removing the incentive for men to excel.

Call it unmanliness, call it wimpishness, weakness or whatever. I call it human nature. And that's to be ignored at one's own peril.

96 posted on 07/17/2003 9:35:06 AM PDT by Tall_Texan (http://righteverytime.blogspot.com - home to Tall_Texan's new column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: disclaimer
The key to this man/woman relationship thing is both partners must respect God first, then with that in place, both can respect and love each other regardless of our faults.

I think that is true. I do respect God. He is first in my life, but the churches in my area just stink--so I'm kind of on my own with that one... The Protestant ones are unbelievably liberal and I'm not Catholic, though my ex was--I used to go to Mass with her (when she used to go, before she got into New Age crap and Tarot reading) and the girls were dressed like 'hoochie-mamas'. I mean it was pretty cool, T & A and lots of exposed flesh, but not really what I would go to church for....

Women want the security to know that the man they marry will be there with them and the children for their entire life.

I don't believe that is true anymore. It may have never been true. I believe that we do not, and cannot, know what women want because they don't know what they want. They only wanted 'security' and a 'life-time mate' because they suffered badly if they didn't.

then women will try to use the state to obtain security.

No, they will use it to get money, fun, power and to avoid responsibility

97 posted on 07/17/2003 9:37:00 AM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (The Guns of Brixton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
What are you talking about? All I said was for men to be men and stand up to fembots. What's your problem with that?

FMCDH

98 posted on 07/17/2003 9:37:35 AM PDT by nothingnew (the pendulum swings and the libs are in the pit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: disclaimer
I agree wholeheartedly. The Bible says men are to love thier wives as Christ loved the Church. Women are to love thier husbands and submit to them. Feminists immediately attacked the "submit" part because they misread the symbiotic nature of marriage. The men are just as responsible for the success of the marriage as the women are but once the contract is broken, both sides find it difficult to trust.

Trusting in God is what heals the wounds inflicted by unloving husbands and unsubmissive wives. But this has been increasingly shunned and discarded by our society and woe is us as a result.

99 posted on 07/17/2003 9:42:20 AM PDT by Tall_Texan (http://righteverytime.blogspot.com - home to Tall_Texan's new column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
We are where we are because of the attitude of eople(sic) like you.

BTW, who's the "we"? You and the mouse in your pocket?

FMCDH

100 posted on 07/17/2003 9:47:22 AM PDT by nothingnew (the pendulum swings and the libs are in the pit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-291 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson