Free Republic Sucks

Free Republic Sucks ^ | May 1, 2003 | By Edgar Hall, Political Editor

[Jim Robinson]

Well, well, well. And yet another anti-Freeper site springs up:

http://www.freerepublicsucks.s5.com/crackdownmay2003.htm

We must be doing something right to have so many Bush haters hating us so much.

Well, we wish you luck. You'll have plenty of competition from FR haters.

[tpaine]

UnBlinkingEye
"Are you sure less debate is the best road to a free republic?"


Debate is not the same as nutcases who want to disrupt. It's like hecklers at a debate. They are like psychotic children or people who just want to destroy. It is completely different from honest debate.
48 -pram-



UBE's point stands, as some of FRs biggest 'disruptors' are the PC crowd who fear no mod.
They far to often 'heckle' honest debate to a flaming halt.

[I know, mea culpa, 'dirty hands' & all that]

[Timesink]

Tsk. Everybody knows you can get unlimited bandwidth for TWENTY DOLLARS.

Man, your supplier love you LONG time.

[Braak]

Hey watch it! I had those moments, but then again, most of the bullies were libs. :) So, I do know the true face of the "rats"

[sweetliberty]

Illbay is gone? Is that possible? Might I ask, what exactly was his "banning offense" since he has been always been offensive near as I could tell?

[cgk]

I was wondering the same thing, but was honestly afraid to ask. I've seen others get slammed for inquiring as to the whereabouts of FReepers, so decided to just keep quiet. I would assume it is only a suspension, and not a complete ban.

[Jim Robinson]

I have no idea what makes these serial abusers tick. They pile it on and pile it on. No matter how many times their posts are pulled or they're warned or suspended, they keep piling on the abuse. Then when the total weight of their accumulated abuses makes it impossible to continue allowing them to post, they run off to some anti-freeper site to whine like babies when they find their posting privileges finally permanently revoked. Life is so unfair. Serial abusers or professional victims? I see no difference.

[Jim Robinson]

Look, if you can't stand FR, why don't you give us all a break and bail out.

[knak]

I think the person has "ahem" Jim Robinson envy?

[k2blader]

Is it bad to just hit "No"?

[Skooz]

The Orwell reference was a nice touch. That's never been done before.............

[Senator Pardek]

Babe? Another 'b' word is more apt. And it rhymes with "itch."

And this is coming from a moron who has a graphic of an atomic blast with the caption "And today was a good day..."

[green team 1999]

bump

[sit-rep]

bttt

[Concentrate]

Noone would dare take you on at this point. You're entirely too reasonable.

[Senator Pardek]

And today was a good day...

Human suffering comes in many forms, and it should never be celebrated.

[Concentrate]

So serial pest jjbrouwer, who's been booted off just about every forum on the Net, and who wrote a viciously anti-American, anti-2A piece for The Scotsman, is now infecting Liberty Post?

And yet he still posts here! Go figure!

[John Robinson]

Verio: "Me love you long time, twenty dollah, beaucoup bandwidth, baby, you party?"

[hope]

What a bunch of pathetic babies...

[Timesink]

Unless there's been a very recent change to the software (John? Has there?), those who are suspended are listed as such on their home pages, along with the date of their return. Illbay, on the other hand, has a "no such user." Which is, uhm, bad.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

ROTFL