Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Even more posts on homosexuality...i'm curious as to why?"
Catholic Family Association of America/ Free Republic ^ | 5/1/03 | Dr. Brian Kopp, Vice President, Catholic Family Association of America

Posted on 05/01/2003 2:41:23 PM PDT by Polycarp

Even more posts on homosexuality...i'm curious as to why? (Click link for background.)

--Dr. Brian Kopp
Vice President, Catholic Family Association of America

5/1/03

A friend of mine is sitting in jail right now, having lived a life of severely self destructive behavior for many years. His current incarceration is for DUI.

From the time he was 13 to 15, he had a steady girlfriend, and was a quiet, well adjusted, normal kid.

At age 15 he was sexually molested by three male homosexuals, and in the process was introduced to drugs (need those whip its to open up a virginal anal sphincter, you know) and heavy alcohol abuse. He has lived a self destructive homosexual lifestyle ever since, a lifestyle induced by molestation and coerced drug and alcohol use at an early age.

I'm personally helping arrange his counseling and legal representation in the lawsuit against his homosexual molestors.

His life has been destroyed by these homosexual predators, yet many here and elsewhere have the unmitigated gall to castigate those of us battling this homosexual juggernaut, especially in regards to the efforts of the GOP to court the homosexual vote.

This type of predatory sexual abuse of young teenage boys is typical chickenhawking homosexual behavior. I've seen it so many times its enough to make me vomit.

And I guarantee if any of them ever touches one of my boys, there will be no trial, only a burial.

Furthermore, the credibility of my entire Church has been undermined by homosexuals who infiltrated its priesthood and systematically buggered its teenage altar boys for years.

And the same types who would criticize the Church for this buggering, also criticize the Church for being so "intolerant" of the homosexual agenda.

This chickenhawking is an integral part of the homosexual subculture, and tacitly and explicitly accepted by the entire movement. Thus the call for lowering the age of consent for homosexual sex across the board by the homo movement.

The homosexual juggernaut presents a clear and present danger to this Republic and the institution of the family upon which all decent societies are built.

The homosexual juggernaut presents a clear and present danger to our children, as chickenhawking is an integral part of its culture. Homosexuals do not reproduce. They are not "born that way." But they do recruit. They are actively trying to recruit your children and mine.

The homosexual juggernaut presents a clear and present danger to our health system.

Mankind has spent several millenia developing effective and sanitary methods of disposing human waste.

Mankind knows that human waste is the source of deadly diseases.

Mankind knows that highly promiscuous sexual behavior of any kind brings with it high morbidity and mortality. Homosexual behavior is inherently promiscuous, as every single sociological study on the subject has repeatedly proven.

Male homosexual behavior is essentially desirous of methods to literally and figuratively swim upstream to the sources of that human waste, with as many different partners as humanly possible.

Therefore, homosexual behavior is deadly and definitely decreases the homosexual's life expectancy, and the visceral repulsion it engenders is a natural, wholesome, and common sense response.

Public health records demonstrate that homosexuals, representing 2 percent of America's population, suffer vastly disproportionate percentages of several of America's most serious STDs, with incidences among homosexuals of diseases like gonorrhea, syphilis, hepatitis A and B, cytomegalovirus, shigellosis, giardiasis, amoebic bowel disease and herpes far exceeding their presence in the general population. These are due to common homosexual practices that include fellatio, anilingus, digital stimulation of the rectum and ingestion of urine and feces.

An exhaustive study in The New England Journal of Medicine, medical literature's only study reporting on homosexuals who kept sexual "diaries," indicated the average homosexual ingests the fecal material of 23 different men each year. The same study indicated the number of annual sexual partners averaged nearly 100. Homosexuals averaged, per year, fellating 106 different men and swallowing 50 of their seminal ejaculations, and 72 penile penetrations of the anus. (Corey, L, and Holmes, K.K., "Sexual Transmission of Hepatitis A in Homosexual Men," New England Journal of Medicine, 1980, vol 302: 435-438; as quoted in "Homosexuality and Civil Rights," Tony Marco, 1992).

A study by McKusick, et al., of 655 San Francisco homosexuals reported that only 24 percent of the sample claimed to have been "monogamous" during the past year, and of this 24 percent, 5 percent drank urine, 7 percent engag-ed in sex involving insertion of a fist in their rectums, 33 percent ingested feces, 53 percent swallowed semen and 59 percent received semen in their rectums in the month just previous to the survey ("AIDS and Sexual Behavior Reported by Homosexual Men in San Francisco," American Journal of Public Health, December 1985, 75: 493-496; quoted in "Homosexuality and Civil Rights," Tony Marco, 1992).

This is my answer to the question, "Even more posts on homosexuality...i'm curious as to why"

As long as this homosexual juggernaut looms over us, pro-family and all men of good will, desirous of defending and spreading the Culture of Life, will engage the battle and fight this integral and insidious piece of the Culture of Death.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; homosexualagenda; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 581-599 next last
To: breakem
Sexual orientation is a choice, but if you are raped when you are a teen then the gender of the person doing the raping determines whether you are homo or hetero…

Do you think that maybe, just for an instance, I thought you were referring to “them” as the rapists, like maybe the one’s in polycarp’a article? Just maybe? It’s often erroneously argued that pedophiles are neither heterosexual nor homosexual even though statistical data says homosexuals are more likely to offend, this is what I thought your were arguing.

When men are raped in prison do they become homosexuals or doesn't this work with adults?

Yes they can, that’s documented…many behavioral pathologies result from a trauma. See polycarp's article for a similar situation. But does it compel one to practice perversion???…that answer would be no.

81 posted on 05/01/2003 5:53:32 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Here's my reply from the original thread, if you're interested:

"From the time he was 13 to 15, he had a steady girlfriend, and was a quiet, well adjusted, normal kid.

At age 15 he was sexually molested by three male homosexuals, and in the process was introduced to drugs (need those whip its to open up a virginal anal sphincter, you know) and heavy alcohol abuse. He has lived a self destructive homosexual lifestyle ever since, a lifestyle induced by molestation and coerced drug and alcohol use at an early age."

Victimology is a trademark of the democratic party, not the republican party. If your friend were truly heterosexual, he would be leading the life of one. Perhaps the reason he is "self-destructive" is because he has friends like you who view him as less than human because of his sexual orientation.

"His life has been destroyed by these fags, and you have the nerve to criticize me?"

Yup, I'll criticize anyone who makes public posts on this board that are contrary to freedom and liberty, not to mention hate-filled, as I believe they are.

"This type of predatory sexual abuse of young teenage boys is typical chickenhawking homosexual behavior. I've seen it so many times its enough to make me vomit.

And I guarantee if any of them ever touches one of my boys, I'll kill the bastard."

Them? Here's a news flash: not every homosexual is a 'predator'. In fact, the vast majority are not. In fact, there are heterosexuals that molest children. I know it must be hard for you to swallow that one, but yes, it's true. In fact, in terms of sheer numbers, I am confident that many more children are molested by heterosexuals than are molested by homosexuals. So, your outrage is, to say the least, a smidge misdirected.

"Furthermore, the credibility of my entire Church has been undermined by homosexuals who infiltrated its priesthood and systematically buggered its teenage altar boys for years."

The credibility of your Church has been undermined by a group of pedophiles. That group of deviants is different than those who are homosexuals. I'm sorry you can't differentiate the two.

"And the same jacka$$es (like you) who would criticize the Church for this buggering, also criticize the Church for being so "intolerant" of the homosexual agenda."

Actually, "jacka$$es" like me would recommend the Church's teaching on homosexuals to you. I've heard a lot more compassion from the Church towards homosexuals than I've ever seen in one of your posts.

"Thus the call for lowering the age of consent for homosexual sex across the board by the homo movement."

If you can prove 1) that the "homo movement" speaks for all homosexuals or 2) that pro-gay groups have actively campaigned for lowering the age of consent, please show your cards. Of course, if this is a specious lie, which I suspect it is, you lose even more credibiility.

"The homosexual juggernaut presents a clear and present danger to this Republic and the institution of the family upon which all decent societies are built."

Another news flash: heterosexuals are doing far more damage to the "family upon which all decent societies are built" than any homosexual could ever dream of doing. Please educate yourself as to marriage and divorce rates over the past 50 years. Additionally, heterosexuals are responsible in large part for children growing up in single family homes and otherwise impoverished. Again, your passion is ridiculously misdirected.

"The homosexual juggernaut presents a clear and present danger to our health system."

This doesn't even deserve a response. It is laughable, not to mention unsubstantiated.

"Mankind has spent several millenia developing effective and sanitary methods of disposing human waste.

Mankind knows that human waste is the source of deadly diseases."

Believe it or not, there are plenty of heterosexuals that engage in anal sex. I know that must come as a shock to your puritannical mindset, but it's true.

Inasmuch as you have cited medical studies from various sources, some dubious and some not, the prevalence of various diseases in the "gay population" really doesn't have much to do with a "health crisis." If you are interested in avoiding STDs like hepatitis and the like, simply don't have sex with multiple partners, and make sure those that you do have sex with are clean.

Your mentality of attacking an entire group of people just because it may be more likely to result in higher disease rates is akin to the liberal attack on smokers, the nazi attempt to remove certain types from the gene pool, and an affront to the liberties guaranteed by the Constitution in general.

If a homosexual, or a heterosexual, or a bisexual, or whatever, wishes to have sex a mentally competent adult who agrees, the fact that it is high risk behavior gives neither you nor me the right to prevent them from engaging in that activity.

I believe in personal responsibility, you apparently believe in paternalism and regulation of individual behavior.

That's not what this country is about. This country is about individual rights and the freedom to run your life as you desire.

I'm sorry you don't understand that.

"Any further "wonderings," Smuck?"

Nope, you've adequately explained to me that you can't justify your attacks and that your passion is woefully misdirected and irrational.

Thanks, though.

Trace
82 posted on 05/01/2003 5:54:06 PM PDT by Trace21230 (Ideal MOAB test site: Paris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImaGraftedBranch
I remember a young man whose life took a similar course because his father molested him regularly as a boy. He died an alcoholic, while his Dad portrayed himself as a fine upstanding church-going man in the community. This pervert exposed himself to my pastor friend's two girls. Just when my pastor friend and our associational director of missions were going to lower the boom on this sicko, he suddenly died of a heart attack. How many other people did this guy victimize before he croaked? Just one of the reasons why God created Hell.
83 posted on 05/01/2003 5:54:23 PM PDT by razorbak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
There, you are.

So in conclusion, if I understand your point, all we have to do to solve the problem of homosexuality is to have heterosexuals sacrifice and rape teenage homosexuals and the trauma will convert them to heterosexuality. Seems a small price to pay to set these people straight.

Also, let's change the law so that heterosexual teen rapists do far less time, say probation, than homosexual ones, since the heterosexual is clearly not harming the person in the long run.

84 posted on 05/01/2003 5:57:13 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
So, what are we to do with homosexuals, even the ones who don't practice it?

I'm fine with misdemeanor fines for sodomy offenses.

85 posted on 05/01/2003 5:57:49 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
"When men are raped in prison do they become homosexuals or doesn't this work with adults? Yes they can, that’s documented…many behavioral pathologies result from a trauma. See polycarp's article for a similar situation. But does it compel one to practice perversion???…that answer would be no."

Not much statistaical info or certainity in your response. Please provide source.

86 posted on 05/01/2003 6:00:22 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: breakem
not much good spelling in my reply either.
87 posted on 05/01/2003 6:02:17 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: breakem
"I asked you to state your position. Judge yourself!"

OK, you got me.

I'll state my position: Homosexuality is an abnormal condition.

88 posted on 05/01/2003 6:02:54 PM PDT by bribriagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: breakem
I don't think I implied any of the things in the post to which I was pinged. You mave have read something into it that wasn't there.

>>The knowledge and science on these threads is laughable.

Enlighten us. Tell us which science you've chosen to accept, and why.

And what should society's position be on a lifestyle choice that has been responsible for one of the worst epidemics of our time?
89 posted on 05/01/2003 6:03:12 PM PDT by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
"...but the idea that "chickenhawking" is a prominent part of the general homosexual population is a ridiculous claim."

Do a little more research. Even mainstream homosexual advocates admit it.

Right. The idea that mainstream homosexual advocates would admit most homosexuals are pedophiles...is nonsense because it would set their cause back 50 years and they know it. Besides, nothing you posted supports such a claim.

I already posted the official statement from GLAAD which is the most mainstream gay rights organization in this country...which clearly condemns NAMBLA and the pedophilia they promote.

The general gay population does not engage in or promote sex with children.

Gay advocates correctly state that most child molesters are heterosexual males. But this is a misleading statement.

I just said the same thing in my previous post...and addressed it's significance.

The rest of your post cites so called statistics that are not only suspect, but don't even agree with each other.

In any case..the fact remains that homosexual pedophiles are a small fringe element in the gay community....they are condemned by nearly all gay rights organizations and are banned even from those hideous gay pride parades.

So once again, the claim that most gays are pedophiles is garbage.

90 posted on 05/01/2003 6:03:53 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Trace21230
Here's my reply to you, from the original thread, if you're interested:

The credibility of your Church has been undermined by a group of pedophiles. That group of deviants is different than those who are homosexuals.

There have been no more than 1% of cases of true pedophilia (sex with a child under 12) in the hundreds of molestation cases that make up the currect Church scandal.

The vast majority (over 90%) involve homosexual molestation of teenage BOYS by MALE priests (call it homosexual ephebophilia if you like, or pederasty, or the popular fag term, "Chickenhawking.)

Since you so demonstrably lied on this whopper, I feel no compunction to waste my time shooting down the rest of them.

The conservative readers of this Forum know that you are simply a mouthpiece for the homosexual propaganda machine.

I'm not worried about which one of us is perceived to be telling the truth here.

91 posted on 05/01/2003 6:04:05 PM PDT by Polycarp ("He who denies the existence of God, has some reason for wishing that God did not exist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: bribriagain
Are you speaking statistically or otherwise? You gotta bring it if you want discourse. The other homo threads today are far more interesting.
92 posted on 05/01/2003 6:04:19 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
"Since you so demonstrably lied on this whopper, I feel no compunction to waste my time shooting down the rest of them."

The first wild claim is debatable.

The second clause shows you can't refute my points.

Oh well, nice try.

Trace
93 posted on 05/01/2003 6:06:23 PM PDT by Trace21230 (Ideal MOAB test site: Paris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: breakem
"Are you speaking statistically or otherwise?"

No, I just want your opinion.

"You gotta bring it if you want discourse."

Bring what? "The other homo threads today are far more interesting."

Follow those threads closely? Speaks volumes.

94 posted on 05/01/2003 6:07:46 PM PDT by bribriagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Right. The idea that mainstream homosexual advocates would admit most homosexuals are pedophiles...is nonsense because it would set their cause back 50 years and they know it. Besides, nothing you posted supports such a claim.

Learn the terminology, or leave the debate!

I have never claimed that mainstream homosexual advocates would admit most homosexuals are pedophiles. See my post to Trace for the difference, and the proper terminology.

Chickenhawking is homosexual molestation of teenage boys, or homosexual ephebophilia.

Pedophilia is any sexual abuse of any child under 12.

Chickenhawking is an integral and accepted part of homosexual culture.

Again, do more research on the subject at hand before you attempt to correct me.

95 posted on 05/01/2003 6:08:13 PM PDT by Polycarp ("He who denies the existence of God, has some reason for wishing that God did not exist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
1) It's not my quote.

Sorry. I couldn't distinguish between the quote and your response.

2) Statistically, you are probably correct.

3) I don't care for pedophiles of any sexual orientation, regardless.

Fair enough.

96 posted on 05/01/2003 6:09:07 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
The science I criticized today says that we can rape homosexual teens and convert them to heterosexuality. If you'd read my posts you'd have the specific info.

I believe adults have the right to have sex and choose their partner from other adults. What do you believe?

I believe the law should govern and prohibit adult sex with children.

There have been several epidemics in the US in the last century. All of which our government responded to with medical care and research. Would you have the government stop this practice? If so, I could use the tax break. And hope you and I do not suffer from the next epidemic.

97 posted on 05/01/2003 6:09:57 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
Violent rapists should be hung

I'm not sure if you are responding to the questions I asked Polycarp. It doesn't seem like you are, so I guess you replied to me in mistake.

But what you said was interesting anyway. Do you believe that violent rapists should be hanged, but not non-violent rapists? And how do we tell the two apart? And were you trying to say, only homosexual violent rapists should be hanged, or do you think every violent rapist should be hanged?

98 posted on 05/01/2003 6:09:59 PM PDT by Urbane_Guerilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
I'm fine with misdemeanor fines for sodomy offenses.

Uh huh. And you're going to have cash-strapped cities employ police officers in chasing down gay people in the privacy of their homes?

I agree completely with public lewdness, but misdemeanors for private sexual acts?

Police chiefs would laugh in your face.

99 posted on 05/01/2003 6:10:57 PM PDT by sinkspur ( i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Trace21230
The first wild claim is debatable.

Not at all. Its simple fact.

The second clause shows you can't refute my points.

I'll let the readers decide. I'm cool with that.

100 posted on 05/01/2003 6:11:23 PM PDT by Polycarp ("He who denies the existence of God, has some reason for wishing that God did not exist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 581-599 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson