Posted on 05/01/2003 2:41:23 PM PDT by Polycarp
Even more posts on homosexuality...i'm curious as to why? (Click link for background.)
--Dr. Brian Kopp
Vice President, Catholic Family Association of America
5/1/03
A friend of mine is sitting in jail right now, having lived a life of severely self destructive behavior for many years. His current incarceration is for DUI.
From the time he was 13 to 15, he had a steady girlfriend, and was a quiet, well adjusted, normal kid.
At age 15 he was sexually molested by three male homosexuals, and in the process was introduced to drugs (need those whip its to open up a virginal anal sphincter, you know) and heavy alcohol abuse. He has lived a self destructive homosexual lifestyle ever since, a lifestyle induced by molestation and coerced drug and alcohol use at an early age.
I'm personally helping arrange his counseling and legal representation in the lawsuit against his homosexual molestors.
His life has been destroyed by these homosexual predators, yet many here and elsewhere have the unmitigated gall to castigate those of us battling this homosexual juggernaut, especially in regards to the efforts of the GOP to court the homosexual vote.
This type of predatory sexual abuse of young teenage boys is typical chickenhawking homosexual behavior. I've seen it so many times its enough to make me vomit.
And I guarantee if any of them ever touches one of my boys, there will be no trial, only a burial.
Furthermore, the credibility of my entire Church has been undermined by homosexuals who infiltrated its priesthood and systematically buggered its teenage altar boys for years.
And the same types who would criticize the Church for this buggering, also criticize the Church for being so "intolerant" of the homosexual agenda.
The homosexual juggernaut presents a clear and present danger to this Republic and the institution of the family upon which all decent societies are built.
The homosexual juggernaut presents a clear and present danger to our children, as chickenhawking is an integral part of its culture. Homosexuals do not reproduce. They are not "born that way." But they do recruit. They are actively trying to recruit your children and mine.
The homosexual juggernaut presents a clear and present danger to our health system.
Mankind has spent several millenia developing effective and sanitary methods of disposing human waste.
Mankind knows that human waste is the source of deadly diseases.
Mankind knows that highly promiscuous sexual behavior of any kind brings with it high morbidity and mortality. Homosexual behavior is inherently promiscuous, as every single sociological study on the subject has repeatedly proven.
Male homosexual behavior is essentially desirous of methods to literally and figuratively swim upstream to the sources of that human waste, with as many different partners as humanly possible.
Therefore, homosexual behavior is deadly and definitely decreases the homosexual's life expectancy, and the visceral repulsion it engenders is a natural, wholesome, and common sense response.
Public health records demonstrate that homosexuals, representing 2 percent of America's population, suffer vastly disproportionate percentages of several of America's most serious STDs, with incidences among homosexuals of diseases like gonorrhea, syphilis, hepatitis A and B, cytomegalovirus, shigellosis, giardiasis, amoebic bowel disease and herpes far exceeding their presence in the general population. These are due to common homosexual practices that include fellatio, anilingus, digital stimulation of the rectum and ingestion of urine and feces.
An exhaustive study in The New England Journal of Medicine, medical literature's only study reporting on homosexuals who kept sexual "diaries," indicated the average homosexual ingests the fecal material of 23 different men each year. The same study indicated the number of annual sexual partners averaged nearly 100. Homosexuals averaged, per year, fellating 106 different men and swallowing 50 of their seminal ejaculations, and 72 penile penetrations of the anus. (Corey, L, and Holmes, K.K., "Sexual Transmission of Hepatitis A in Homosexual Men," New England Journal of Medicine, 1980, vol 302: 435-438; as quoted in "Homosexuality and Civil Rights," Tony Marco, 1992).
A study by McKusick, et al., of 655 San Francisco homosexuals reported that only 24 percent of the sample claimed to have been "monogamous" during the past year, and of this 24 percent, 5 percent drank urine, 7 percent engag-ed in sex involving insertion of a fist in their rectums, 33 percent ingested feces, 53 percent swallowed semen and 59 percent received semen in their rectums in the month just previous to the survey ("AIDS and Sexual Behavior Reported by Homosexual Men in San Francisco," American Journal of Public Health, December 1985, 75: 493-496; quoted in "Homosexuality and Civil Rights," Tony Marco, 1992).
This is my answer to the question, "Even more posts on homosexuality...i'm curious as to why"
As long as this homosexual juggernaut looms over us, pro-family and all men of good will, desirous of defending and spreading the Culture of Life, will engage the battle and fight this integral and insidious piece of the Culture of Death.
Also, your logic is flawed, because laws are based upon morality does not mean that all immoral behavior should be outlawed. You can not automatically apply the inverse meaning in a generality. You need to learn about logic, freedom, and the role of government. Then perhaps we can call you a conservative.
Pot...Kettle (as they say)
See my last post to you.
This "evidence" is utterly irrelevant to your original claim.
Your reading comprehension and retension skills are woefully deficient. I'll help you with a little review of excerpts from my recent posts:
Free clue: referring to OTHER evidence does not change the fact that the "evidence" I quoted was irrelevant to your claim.
But some (though not all) of your excerpts are indeed relevant to your claim. I'll take a look at them; you might be right---but you don't help your case by mixing relevant and irrelevant data.
Since the other poster set up the construct (sorry if I used adult words without your permission) I merely applied it to show the fallacy. The logic was not mine, but the original poster. I notice you attacked me for pointing it out, but not the one who was actually illogical.
One wonders why you wonder...
Which is it: 73% or 23%? (Or are these two different works titled The Gay Report?)
Is that the same 1948 Kinsey survey of prisoners and mental patients that claimed that 10% of the total population is gay?
They are for homosexuals.
But according to Catholic.net:
"Tim Dailey, a senior fellow for culture studies at the Family Research Council[...] released a report in May detailing the link between homosexuality and abuse of minors and noted that even homosexuals acknowledge the link.
"'In The Gay Report, by homosexual researchers Karla Jay and Allen Young, the authors report data showing that 73% of homosexuals surveyed had at some time had sex with boys 16 to 19 years of age or younger,' Dailey said."
http://www.catholic.net/hot_topics/print.phtml?article_id=490
Not difficult, impossible: not wonders, abominations.
I attacked the conclusion drawn as opposite the decision to choose and said it means we can rape homo teens and convert them. If you think that's good science or that I am wrong, please elaborate.
My comments about science applies to the various anti-homo threads which appear here regularly. In todays example two anecdotes were cited and now I'm to nominate it for Nobel science prize?
You obviously have no idea what you're talking about. That's the most foolish, idiotic post I have seen on FR in years. (and that's saying quite a bit)
"Judicial Activism" is when the court writes law, instead of the legislature. It's a coup and at that point you may as well put crowns on their heads and call these 9, almost un-accountable & completely un-elected people in black pajamas the defacto rulers of our nation. As they have completely thwarted the will of the people and their duly elected representatives.
If you want to completely slip the leash on all levels of our government and ignore the Bill of Rights, there's no way faster or more sure than Judicial Activism.
Contrary to what you posted, it's not " the role of the court to stop such tyranny and to protect the rights. " Courts are there to apply the law as it is written, period.
What I find amazing is how you characterize my comment, but find it perfectly acceptable for the government to regulate this behavior. What country are you posting from?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.