But according to Catholic.net:
"Tim Dailey, a senior fellow for culture studies at the Family Research Council[...] released a report in May detailing the link between homosexuality and abuse of minors and noted that even homosexuals acknowledge the link.
"'In The Gay Report, by homosexual researchers Karla Jay and Allen Young, the authors report data showing that 73% of homosexuals surveyed had at some time had sex with boys 16 to 19 years of age or younger,' Dailey said."
http://www.catholic.net/hot_topics/print.phtml?article_id=490
Its all a matter of which words you want to emphasize, isn't it.
Which is it: 73% or 23%?
Given the fact that all the other references consistently report 73%
I think it would be a safe assumption that 23% was a typo. I'll try to track down a copy of the original.
Free clue: referring to OTHER evidence does not change the fact that the "evidence" I quoted was irrelevant to your claim.
Smuck. You took one excerpt of one post and tried to infer that all my evidence failed to support my claim, when it was obvious I was posting both evidence from mainstream homosexual publications/activists as well as objective sttistics and studies to prove my thesis.
But some (though not all) of your excerpts are indeed relevant to your claim. I'll take a look at them; you might be right---but you don't help your case by mixing relevant and irrelevant data.
How gracious of you.
Too bad you're the only one having difficulty following the points of this debate.