[brownie]

No, you stated that the science on the thread was laughable, and the other posters pointed out that the science on the thread was from such places as the New England Journal of Medicine and asked what, specifically was laughable in your opinion. You still haven't answered or come up w/ any "scientific facts" that homosexuality is normal.

[breakem]

I haven't said homosexuality was normal. Why would I present the science that proves something I have not said. Your reading is incorrect.

[breakem]

see 43 for New England Journal opinion by those with whom I was disagreeing.

I attacked the conclusion drawn as opposite the decision to choose and said it means we can rape homo teens and convert them. If you think that's good science or that I am wrong, please elaborate.

My comments about science applies to the various anti-homo threads which appear here regularly. In todays example two anecdotes were cited and now I'm to nominate it for Nobel science prize?