Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHAT DID HAPPEN TO FLIGHT 93?
mirror.co.uk ^ | 1/27/03 | RICHARD WALLACE

Posted on 01/26/2003 9:28:46 PM PST by Polycarp

WHAT DID HAPPEN TO FLIGHT 93?

RICHARD WALLACE, US Editor, examines riddle of hijacked jet as he visits crash site

THE unmarked military-style jet swooped down at high speed through the valley, twice circled the smouldering black scar where Flight 93 had careered into the ground just seconds earlier and then hurtled off over the horizon.

GRIEF: Victims' relatives visit a makeshift memorial at crash site

At least six eyewitnesses saw the mysterious aircraft on the morning of September 11 last year. But the US authorities deny it ever existed.

So when George Bush laid a wreath yesterday at the crash site in a remote valley outside Shanksville, Pennsylvania, he was one of only a handful of people who know what really happened to the 40 innocents and four hijackers aboard the doomed United Airlines Boeing 757-200.

Those unimaginable final seconds as passengers showed courageous defiance apparently wrestling for control of the aircraft have become one of the defining images of the tragedy.

And "Let's roll" - ringleader Todd Beamer's no-nonsense call to arms - became a defining battle cry in America's war on terror.

But of the four aircraft taken on September 11, the exact fate of Flight 93 after its two-hour journey is proving difficult for US officials to explain.

What was the white jet doing there and why won't they admit to its presence? Why did other witnesses see smoke and flames trailing from Flight 93 as it fell from the sky, indicating a possible explosion aboard?

Or - and this is proving to be the most uncomfortable question of all - in the moments before the airliner piled into the black, spongey earth at 575mph did an American fighter pilot have to do the unthinkable and shoot down a US civil airliner?

Susan Mcelwain, 51, who lives two miles from the site, knows what she saw - the white plane rocketed directly over her head.

"It came right over me, I reckon just 40 or 50ft above my mini-van," she recalled. "It was so low I ducked instinctively. It was travelling real fast, but hardly made any sound.

"Then it disappeared behind some trees. A few seconds later I heard this great explosion and saw this fireball rise up over the trees, so I figured the jet had crashed. The ground really shook. So I dialled 911 and told them what happened.

"I'd heard nothing about the other attacks and it was only when I got home and saw the TV that I realised it wasn't the white jet, but Flight 93.

Ididn't think much more about it until the authorities started to say there had been no other plane. The plane I saw was heading right to the point where Flight 93 crashed and must have been there at the very moment it came down.

"There's no way I imagined this plane - it was so low it was virtually on top of me. It was white with no markings but it was definitely military, it just had that look.

"It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back of a car and with two upright fins at the side. I haven't found one like it on the internet. It definitely wasn't one of those executive jets. The FBI came and talked to me and said there was no plane around.

"Then they changed their story and tried to say it was a plane taking pictures of the crash 3,000ft up.

"But I saw it and it was there before the crash and it was 40ft above my head. They did not want my story - nobody here did."

Mrs Mcelwain, who looks after special needs children, is further convinced the whole truth has yet to come out because of a phone call she had within hours from the wife of an air force friend of the family.

"She said her husband had called her that morning and said 'I can't talk, but we've just shot a plane down,' " Susan said. "I presumed they meant Flight 93. I have no doubt those brave people on board tried to do something, but I don't believe what happened on the plane brought it down.

"If they shot it down, or something else happened, everyone, especially the victims' families, have a right to know."

Lee Purbaugh, 32, was the only person to see the last seconds of Flight 93 as it came down on former strip-mining land at precisely 10.06am - and he also saw the white jet.

He was working at the Rollock Inc. scrapyard on a ridge overlooking the point of impact, less than half a mile away. "I heard this real loud noise coming over my head," he told the Daily Mirror. "I looked up and it was Flight 93, barely 50ft above me. It was coming down in a 45 degree and rocking from side to side. Then the nose suddenly dipped and it just crashed into the ground. There was this big fireball and then a huge cloud of smoke."

But did he see another plane? "Yes, there was another plane," Lee said. "I didn't get a good look but it was white and it circled the area about twice and then it flew off over the horizon."

Tom Spinelli, 28, was working at India Lake Marina, a mile and a half away. "I saw the white plane," he said.

"It was flying around all over the place like it was looking for something. I saw it before and after the crash."

India Lake also contributes to the view there was an explosion on board before the Newark-San Francisco flight came down. Debris rained down on the lake - a curious feat if, as the US government insists, there was no mid-air explosion and the plane was intact until it hit the ground.

"It was mainly mail, bits of in-flight magazine and scraps of seat cloth," Tom said. "The authorities say it was blown here by the wind." But there was only a 10mph breeze and you were a mile and a half away? Tom raised his eyebrows, rolled his eyes and said: "Yeah, that's what they reckon."

Light debris was also found eight miles away in New Baltimore. A section of engine weighing a ton was located 2,000 yards - over a mile -from the crash site. Theorists point out a Sidewinder heat-seeking missile attacks the hottest part of aircraft - the engine.

The authorities say the impact bounced it there. But the few pieces of surviving fuselage, local coroner Wallace Miller told us, were "no bigger than a carrier bag".

Nearly all the passengers were reduced to charcoal on impact and the largest piece of human tissue found was a section of spine eight inches long.

CURIOUSLY, military officials insist there was never any pursuit of Flight 93, although they were informed that it was a suspected hijack at 9.16am, 50 minutes before the plane came down.

At 9.35am they assumed it was heading for Washington DC after it changed course in a 180 degree turn and three F-16s - top speed 1,800mph - now patrolling over the capital were told to "protect the White House at all costs".

An anonymous flight controller said on the day that an F-16 was "in hot pursuit" of Flight 93 - Washington to Shanksville is seven to 10 minutes flying time.

A few minutes before the crash Bill Wright, piloting a single-engine Piper, could see Flight 93 three miles away, but was suddenly told to turn away and land immediately without explanation.

At 9.58am a 911 call - the last mobile phone contact from Flight 93 - was made from one of the airliner's toilets by passenger Edward Felt.

Glenn Cramer, the emergency supervisor who answered it, said on the day: "He was very distraught. He said he believed the plane was going down.

"He did hear some sort of an explosion and saw white smoke coming from the plane, but he didn't know where. And then we lost contact with him." Glenn Cramer has now been gagged by the FBI.

Also, according to sources, the last seconds of the cockpit voice recorder are the loud sounds of wind, hinting at a possible hole somewhere in the fuselage. What caused the smoke and explosion? Why the wind sounds?

The FBI's later explanation for the white jet was that a passing civilian Fairchild Falcon 20 jet was asked to descend from 34,000ft to 5,000ft some minutes after the crash to give co-ordinates for the site. The plane and pilot have never been produced or identified. Susan Mcelwain says a Falcon 20 was not the plane she saw.

FURTHER verification that some kind of military aircraft was operating in the area is scientifically irrefutable.

At 9.22am a sonic boom - caused by supersonic flight - was picked up by an earthquake monitoring station in southern Pennsylvania, 60 miles from Shanksville.

That Todd Beamer and others launched an assault on the hijackers there is no doubt. The brief extracts released from audio tapes indicate a fierce struggle going on at the cockpit door.

But nobody - official or otherwise - has categorically said the group got into the cockpit or that their actions led to the crash. Those final, agonising moments are mere presumption.

President Bush and his team have the whole story. So why aren't they telling the rest of us?

UA93: THE EVIDENCE

THE WITNESSES

At least SIX witnesses, including Susan Mcelwain saw a small military type plane flying around shortly BEFORE UA93 crashed. The FBI denies its existence

THE DEBRIS

The US Government insists the plane exploded on impact yet a one-ton section of the engine was found over a mile away and other light debris was found scattered over eight miles away

THE MOBILE CALL

Passenger Edward Felt made an emergency call from the plane. He spoke of an explosion and seeing some white smoke. The superviser who took the call has been gagged by the FBI

THE F-16s

UA93 was identified as a hijack at 9.16am. At 9.35am three F-16s were ordered to "protect the White House at all costs" when it turned towards the capital. At 10.06am it crashed at Shanksville, less than 10mins flying time from Washington

THE BLACK BOXS

Sources claim the last thing heard on the cockpit voice recorder is the sound of wind - suggesting the plane had been holed

THE SONIC BOOM

The FBI insists there was no military plane in the area but at 9.22am a sonic boom - caused by a supersonic jet - was picked up by an earthquake monitor in southern Pennsylvania, 60 miles away from Shanksville.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; flight93; wtcattacks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last
To: Polycarp
Winglits at the wingtips
41 posted on 01/26/2003 10:23:38 PM PST by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
It was white with no markings but it was definitely military, it just had that look.

You know, the FAA has a number of small jets in their fleet, but, it couldn't have POSSIBLY been one of their jets out to take a look-see ...

I think the observer in this case was just plain, flat wrong in not noticing the so-called 'tail numbers' ...

42 posted on 01/26/2003 10:24:46 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
"Yeah right."

Believe what you need to believe.

43 posted on 01/26/2003 10:25:10 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Atchafalaya
They gonna take flight 800 to the grave, pppffffttt!

Thats the one I wish they would open up. The coverup was so transparent it was offensive.

But you are right. They will never tell the story.

44 posted on 01/26/2003 10:25:53 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: OneLoyalAmerican
see post 37, cap'n.
45 posted on 01/26/2003 10:26:16 PM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
That information will released just after the Kennedy Assassination information is "declassified."

As long as the one party cartel runs things at the top, that will be the case, which is a damn shame in both cases.

46 posted on 01/26/2003 10:26:21 PM PST by Mulder (Guns and chicks rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Dane
True, but those working the USX Tower and one of the PPG buildings (tall building in downtown Pittsburgh) were told specifically to evacuate immediately (a plane was lost/hijacked over Cleveland and in Pgh. airspace.) It was widely reported here. Not saying it proves anything one way or the other, but it was widely reported here prior to the crash in Somerset.
47 posted on 01/26/2003 10:28:03 PM PST by PennsylvaniaMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Dane; MadIvan
but the Mirror is one of the most leftist papers in the UK

This is certainly a relevant piece of information. Thank you. I did not know their political bent.

madivan,

Can you comment regarding this paper?

48 posted on 01/26/2003 10:28:16 PM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Where did you get that picture? Are there any others like it?
49 posted on 01/26/2003 10:28:32 PM PST by Orion78 (I hope Golitsyn is wrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
How many 747's of that type that are older and never had the same "old sparky "problem are still carrying the load? I don't know but I bet it is a bunch.
50 posted on 01/26/2003 10:29:13 PM PST by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp

WHAT HAPPENED TO FLIGHT 93:

The plane was hijacked. The passengers found out via their cell phones that this was no ordinary hijacking and they were all going to die. So the passengers rebelled and tried to take back control. They failed, but they did manage to at least cause the terrorists to lose control as well, and thus ensured the plane crashed somewhere where nobody else could be hurt. The end.

Remember that The Mirror is massively, totally, virulently anti-Bush, anti-Blair and anti-war. (And they've lost between 6 and 10% of their entire circulation, since they decided to position the paper as a liberal hate-based rag after 9/11.)

If you need a little more convincing, here's Monday morning's Daily Mirror cover:

In case you can't make it out, that's a photo of the newspaper projecting a giant anti-war image onto the side of Parliament.

51 posted on 01/26/2003 10:29:55 PM PST by Timesink (I offered her a ring, she gave me the finger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Askel5; abner; aristeides
I've come to the conclusion that Flight 93 was disabled by military aircraft; not shot down
52 posted on 01/26/2003 10:30:12 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
"As long as the one party cartel runs things at the top, that will be the case, which is a damn shame in both cases.

I agree.

53 posted on 01/26/2003 10:31:06 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
I'm not sure why the critics here are so vehemently insulting.

Because dear, from where you sit you only see a SMALL part of the picture.

Do you know anything about RADAR?

Do you know anything about the Air Route Surveilance RADAR (ARSR) system the FAA employs to watch air routes?

Do you also know that most major aerodomes (large cities) ALSO have Airport Surveilance RADARs (ASR) with a ranhe out to sixty Nautical miles?

Do you know that HUMAN BEINGS actually watch these RADARs and would have WITNESED on their scopes what this author's article descibes - fighter planes in relatively close proximity?

These RADAR operators, then, are ALSO witnesses to this event.

No?

54 posted on 01/26/2003 10:31:22 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
Thanks, and I'll check the 60 Mins 2 archives, as well as the 20/20 Thursdays, etc.

I figured it must have been an interview by one of the "main stars". So far, though, I can't find any interview with the Secretary, which does seem alittle odd. I remember seeing a short interview or two with him myself, but I don't remember any statement like the one you said you heard.

Personally, I don't believe that plane was shot down. I believe it would have been, had the passengers not intervened and tried to take control of the airplane.

I guess it is possible that the familes of those on board were bought off and coached on how to tell a story of speaking to their loved ones planning to take over the plane, etc. But when weighed against actual kook-theorists and their cottage industry of anti-anything-government (not to mention monetary profit), I'm with the educated & reasoned percent of the population.
But open to *documented* Facts!

55 posted on 01/26/2003 10:31:25 PM PST by LurkerNoMore!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Orion78
That's it, it's off Fema's site. I've seen it before.. It's legit.
56 posted on 01/26/2003 10:32:04 PM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Atchafalaya
I don't know but I bet it is a bunch.

And you would be wrong.

57 posted on 01/26/2003 10:32:22 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
At least SIX witnesses, including Susan Mcelwain saw a small military type plane flying around shortly BEFORE UA93 crashed. The FBI denies its existence.

Standard FBI operational procedure.

Passenger Edward Felt made an emergency call from the plane. He spoke of an explosion and seeing some white smoke. The superviser who took the call has been gagged by the FBI.

Standard FBI operational procedure.

The FBI insists there was no military plane in the area but at 9.22am a sonic boom - caused by a supersonic jet - was picked up by an earthquake monitor in southern Pennsylvania, 60 miles away from Shanksville.

Standard FBI operational procedure.

58 posted on 01/26/2003 10:33:53 PM PST by judgeandjury (The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Is there a jet version of the Bronco type FAC aircraft? She describes that type. Like the old British Vampire. Unless the upright fins she mentions are winglets at the wing tips.

59 posted on 01/26/2003 10:34:21 PM PST by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
...with two upright fins at the side.

Look mid-wing on this picture.


60 posted on 01/26/2003 10:35:09 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson