"So did Bill Clinton. The good actors have range."Amen to that, COB !I'll type this really slow so you can understand it really well:
GEORGE BUSH IS NOT BILL CLINTON!
 |
 |
 |
|
Let's get him! |
Posted on 09/10/2002 8:32:22 PM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs
This is why Bush is such a refreshing change from the Impeached One who saw shades of gray in the meaning of a two letter word.
As would I, so long as he honors the principles of limited government and individual rights.
The only thing which matters to me is who our President is when the cameras are off. You seem to think he is the same as Clinton. If that is so, I will not be the last to tell you, you have a lot of learning to do before you will be an astute judge of character.
You are projecting here. I was poking ridicule at the simpletons who are swooned off their feet because he "shed a tear." That reminds me of the Clinton hearthrobs who could see no wrong in their man.
One question. A little boy walks up to the President with a picture of his missing father, a firefighter in the WTC. Do you think Bush would be sad about that after the cameras went off, and he was home alone? Would Clinton? Would Bush look on it as an opportunity to hit on the mother? Would Clinton?
No question about it. Bush would be genuinely touched and Clinton would opportunize it. However, that is not the context in which this thread started.
Two different people, both in and out of the camera. If you can't see that, don't assume the rest of us will be interested in your assessment of people's character in the future.
Frankly, I seriously doubt that either you, nor I, have much insight into the character of Mr. Bush. Modern presidents are so protected and shielded from the public, and their contact so highly managed, that we see what the consultants and handlers want us to see. There are people who are members of the Bush circle who know him and have the information necessary to judge his character. None of those people post on this forum.
And for the record, I'm registered independant, with Libertarian views. Bush isn't "my boy", and we disagree on as much as we agree on. I just like him because I think he's a decent guy.
And, for the record, I'm registered Republican and have voted straight ticket in every election until the most recent. I neither like, nor dislike, Bush. I don't know Bush. I know that there are many Bush policies that I find abhorrent, and some that I favor a great deal. Nevertheless, as I've already stated, my original comments were intended to tweek those infatuated with Bush, much like the Clinton drones were, not to demean Bush himself. I don't expect the hard core Bush fanatics to understand that distinction, but it exists and is relevant.
Sure, I'll wait. Just like the drooling groupies will wait to start swooning over it. And, don't go dropping the 9/11 guilt trip on me. That is downright sick of you to even try it. SHAME ON YOU!
I'll type this really slow so you can understand it really well:
GEORGE BUSH IS NOT BILL CLINTON!
You caught me. I'm not really a human. I'm just like you.
I did a search on your previous posts, and you have never had a positive or kind thing to say about anyone or anything.
Now, that is just not true. Unfortunately, the forum has a way of purging all the threads where I am inspired to say nice things. Kinda spooky, don't you think? ;-)
So post all you want, but if you ever bother to come out of your dark and paranoid underground bunker, you might be able to look in the mirror and see that you are a miserable person whose only joy in life is to spread your unhappiness around like fresh manure.
Try a little honesty in your life and maybe you won't be so bitter.
Oh, how witty of you. I'm not interested in retreating into a drug induced haze, though.
Jolly you are the one guy Will Rogers never met.
I was willing to give you the benefit of some doubt, and banter with humor, but you are, simply, utterly sick. Begone. You add nothing to the discourse but bile. And lord knows, we have enough of that in this world.
All I know for sure is that the really good ones have a sense of humor. You might be one of the good ones...
That's very mature of you.
She's got you pegged, like it or not.
He is a powerful speaker when he is well prepared, his material scripted, and his delivery practiced. When he speaks impromptu, he fumbles and bumbles. I'm sure that will inflame the anger of many of the groupies, but it is something that all have observed, and most have commented upon or even found endearing. There is nothing wrong with that. It simply is. The comical part is how ballistic so many people are getting over having it pointed out.
It was my honest evaluation, given his history of public speaking and the words of the author in the posted article. That's all either one of us have to go on. You can have your opinions, and I can have mine. They may even disagree. However, there is also a reality out there that we both have access to observe, and it is not subjective. Think about it for a few.
No, the comical part is how it doesn't slip through your anrrow mind what an absolute idiot you are to bring your craven idiocy to a solemn occasion. You are like a geek drunk at a funeral, and should be dealt with thusly.
You comapre this President to Clinton in the same sentnece you call Clinton a murderer and NOW you say those who responded to your oral defecation as "ballistic". A classic case of the pot calling the kettle black
I remember being very worried at the time that I'd run into Clinton in Manhattan when he was in his "comforting" mode!
"So did Bill Clinton. The good actors have range."Amen to that, COB !I'll type this really slow so you can understand it really well:
GEORGE BUSH IS NOT BILL CLINTON!
|
|
|
|
|
Let's get him! |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.