Posted on 02/12/2023 1:46:09 PM PST by nickcarraway
Larry Flynt, considered by some to be the penultimate pornographer and defender of first amendment free speech rights, is revered by many Americans both alt and mainstream. But they didn’t know Larry like Julie Moya, one of his ex-employees who stripped at his club!
At age 15 — and living in a home for wayward youth — Julie alleges that a fellow resident offered to bring her to the club where the girl herself was working so Julie could earn a few dollars. Yes, Jools was only 15. But she was a fully-developed and very pretty natural blond. Mr. Flynt would surely hire her.
Ms. Moya wasn’t sure exactly what she was getting herself into — but acclimated to the champagne hustle environment quickly — and moved to an apartment upstairs from the club on Walnut Street in Cincinnati. Larry himself was living in one of the other apartments in the same building. All Julie cared about was being out of the home, into her own apartment, and making money. Life had definitely taken a turn for the better.
As a young man with a young man’s libido, Larry dabbled with his employees. Generally, he’d order up one of the club’s girls a few times a week for a romp. Julie alleges got the call at age 16!
Asked if Larry knew Julie was underage, Ms. Moya reported that it was well-known throughout the club that she was a minor. In fact, the girls used to joke with her “Hey Julie! Are you 18 yet?” Jools had the body of a Playboy bunny — tender age notwithstanding.
Moya reports that upon watching the Hollywood feature “The People Versus Larry Flynt,” she couldn’t help but laugh at the scene in which Larry was portrayed as a man who never employed underage women. Says Moya: “I certainly wasn’t the only underage girl in the club. There were several of us. And Larry knew we were minors.”
With respect to Larry’s sexual predilections, Julie recalls that she actually “saw” him on four different occasions, and contends that he was a rough, coarse, and “dominant trick.”
She was too young to understand the dynamics of S & M at the time. But in retrospect, Julie now realizes he tended toward that world — and adds that the younger Larry Flynt was not physically disgusting — in that he wasn’t hygenically-challenged nor repulsive to look at naked. Her interaction with him wasn’t that stuff of PTSD. He just wasn’t that special guy she fell for or looked forward to seeing on a habitual basis.
At some point during her employment at the club, a couple of the club's customers approached her and some other girls with an offer that spelled the end of her employment with Flynt.
The guys were giving out cards and telling girls if they came to Tennessee and worked for them, they could make a ton of money in their organization. And some of the girls who went for the bait traveled to Tennessee and were never heard from again!
Sooner than later, Julie was questioned by the FBI and offered a witness protection deal she couldn’t refuse. After taking the witness stand in the pursuant court case, Ms. Moya was farmed out to Minnesota with a new name and a job selling Pappagalo shoes at a local department store. And thus ended her relationship with Mr. Flynt.
Asked how she feels about her ex-employer in retrospect, this reporter got the impression that Julie felt nothing. Alas, he really hadn’t left a meaningful impression positive or negative on her. Julie, now in her 60s, has worked a lot of clubs — and run at least one brothel — in her life.
In the world of sex for sale, men come and go with alarming regularity. And Larry was just another guy with a libido. Nothing remarkable either way.
Not at all. While it may require some effort to demonstrate what ARE our P&I or other rights retained under the laws of the States that Ratified it is easy to determine what ARE NOT these: anything illegal among any of the several States when they Ratified the language.
As for porn not being speech, it was not considered speech when the 1st was Ratified as well.
There was a special on the A&E channel a while back called “Secrets of Playboy”.
When I saw it advertised I figured it was just gonna be a bunch of T&A but it wasn’t.
Many revealing interviews about Hefner and guests at the mansion and how they drugged and abused not only bunnys but Hefner would send hid toadies out to recruit women right off the street.
Things that went on were way worse than I ever imagined.
That’s based means you were spitting facts, not that I disagreed with you.
That’s based means you were spitting facts, not that I disagreed with you.
As I remember, Larry Flynt did most of the ‘revealing’.
Oh, sorry.
As one who inflicts typos on the world I read that as if you had too. Sorry.
This writer is not too bright, apparently, and uses words without understanding their meaning. Does he really mean Flynt is the second to last pornographer? Makes no sense.
This article makes me think there is some revelation about Biden and an undrraged family member about to surface and the media is trying soften the impact. Why else would the left consider this article “newsworthy”?
I am back and I did a couple bids for running a brothel and my luck, now it's decriminalized
Larry Flynt was a pig. Case closed, end of argument end of story.
He was the “dirty” Hugh Hefner.
Both of the magazines were the first “soft porn,” but not the last and neither Flynt nor Hefner were ever “revered.”
Yes, the worst kind of pervert would revere Flynt!
I regret to say that as a teenager, I regularly read all three magazines, Playboy, Hustler, and Penthouse.
I outgrew all three (along with MAD magazine) but out of all of these three, Penthouse was probably the classiest. I especially like the Forum section of Penthouse which was letters from readers, if I recall. Wild stuff.
What, you mean Flynt earned his horrible reputation?
neither is burning a flag... yet here we are
I watched a couple shows like that on YT.
Several of the women said that there was a whole system of “secondary Hefners,” lounge-lizard type guys who set up their own Playboy-clone operations from the supply of second-level girls who were either rejected by Playboy as not quite up to their standards, or else they were used for one or two pictures but had no hope of being Playmate of the Month or anything like that.
He had a sort of caste system operating, and the girls were farmed out to Hollywood big shots and other wealthy men in Los Angeles and beyond. It was total sleeze, gussied and tarted up to look like a fun, sophisticated lifestyle. Really comes as no surprise at all to anyone who knows how the world works.
Curious...
Porn is protected as free speech, according to SCOTUS. SCOTUS has also said that virtually anything that affects commerce can be regulated. Since porn is a multi-billion dollar industry, and would not exist but for the money involved, why can’t porn be regulated as commerce?
“Based on his writing acumen, I am guessing he is about 12.”
Isn’t that the truth? What a pile of garbage. I felt like I was watching one of those movies that never seems to get going and you keep thinking to yourself “This HAS to get better and make some sense. I’ll tough it out.” Then the end credits roll and you are left thinking “That’s 90 minutes I’ll never get back.”
Democrats.
He’s dead, Jim.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.