Posted on 12/16/2021 10:36:32 PM PST by nickcarraway
On Monday, singing sensation Billie Eilish, only 19 years old, confessed to Howard Stern that she had started watching porn movies on TV while still in grade school.
“I used to watch a lot of porn, to be honest. I started watching when I was like 11.” Eilish believes that her habit — it started with entry-level, “normal” porn and spiraled downward into more extreme forms — really warped her mind. “It got to a point where I couldn’t watch anything else unless it was violent,” she admitted. As a result, her ideas about sex and relationships became “warped.”
Eilish’s words may be shocking to many Americans. But what she described is not extraordinary, or the result of bad parenting or something their own children would never dream of doing. Habitual exposure to porn resulting in addiction is a pandemic amongst young people. Thanks to Pornhub, it’s anonymous, free and easily accessible.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Porn is not “speech”, no more than prostitution. It has always been the Left’s opinion that it is, and should be protected like normal speech. If they want to come against it now, which I doubt, you can’t blame a broken clock for being right twice a day.
She’s an in-vitro baby. Conceived in a laboratory. Knows the father but he wasn’t around. Raised and homeschooled by the mother. Go figure. Mother doesn’t want her in government schools but raises her in an atmosphere that screwed her up.
Don’t think she, a 19-year-old kid-woman, has some sophisticated ulterior motive here. She just spit out the truth to Stern: Porn screwed up her brain. Porn does screw up the brain. As the brain becomes desensitized by its use, it need harder and harder doses of it to get the same brain chemical rush. Porn destroys marriages, has some acting out with prostitutes what they see, and is related to ED as LumberJack53213 stated.
All porn is sexual perversion. Sex is for monogamous married couples.
“...feminism”
If there is any anti-porn effort, it would target hetero-male material. All other porn is “art”, “free-speech”, etc etc. Your added point is spot on that this feminist public conversion therapy for hetero-males goes beyond the hidden-behind-closed-doors-porn - removing attractive women (as men would see them) from various media and print. It’s been going on for at least two decades, but is more that even common today. It is interesting to read the feminists’ diatribes and hated toward those “MGTOW”. Their outrage towards MGTOW speaks for itself - obvious evidence why some hetero-men going their own way are better off without the ugly, raging feminist being in their lives.
As a general rule, that is true about porn. Some would say a sculpture depicting a nude human (like Michelangelo’s David) is porn. Others would say a Playboy centerfold is porn. Others would say Larry Flynnt’s magazines is porn. A justice once wrote that to define porn - one knows it when one sees it. Christianity used to be the puritans on fighting against porn, but the anti-traditional Christian left, including the feminists, used free speech and the sexual revolution to purposely defeat the strong influence of public Christian morality. Many people don’t go to church anympore. Now the public morality is being defined by the anti-God left who caused many of the problems in the first place. Look what was done to the “definition of marriage” by the left.
The genie is out of the bottle.
” She just spit out the truth to Stern.”
Stern had to be caught in a wedge with a fellow lefty, as he has made millions on pushing, endorsing and crossing the porn line.
Teens quickly learn how to use the incognito mode. That doesn’t leave a search history.
More and more as they see the state of society and their options in it.
The issue is they see little to no opportunity, which makes socialist ideas seem like the only option.
The right guy hasn't shown up yet to paint the picture for them of what could be and what was taken from them. When that guy shows up (and he will), Katy bar the door.
“removing attractive women from movies, tv ...”
We’ve got some beautiful news girls on our local channels, and the national ones too.
So now she’s the good guy, duh?
>Porn is not “speech”
Neither is owning a bible so it’s ok to ban it if someone finds ut objectionable?
I’m glad this great thinking is weighing in on lofty topics. Did she mention if she got vaccinated 3 times?
Yeah it’s incumbent on the parents to monitor that, but I don’t see how you could possibly prevent it at this point. God knows what these kids are seeing these days.
Why? Because she speaking out publicly against the harm that porn causes young people?
That’s a fairly decent definition.
You obviously know nothing about her except this article
Google Billie Ellish Donald Trump
Or better yet Google Billie Ellish leaked porn or nude
She’s a hot mess
A sage over porn..lol...sure
I don’t like fat assed black women...nor fembot lyrics
Do you nick?
A Bible is composed of actual words. A written form of speech. Performing sexual acts for money in front of a camera is not. But I think a few grams of common sense is required to tell the difference.
You like Ben Shapiro right...
I think he’s a neocon with a loose grip on culture war issues but no question he has a steel trap brain and debates really well....although he should have smacked or at least warned that Tur freak that time
One of his golden rules about debating or arguing is when your opponent starts off personal ....like you inferring I’m old....they’ve already lost whatever their point was.
I’m 64 btw....unlike the many cowards here I don’t hide who I am ....and take the heat for my southern viewpoint ....which rankles neocons incessantly
Nice thread though...
Sorry it’s not getting much attention nick
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.