Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Despotism (1946) An educational short film shown in schools until 1967
public domain film review ^

Posted on 10/20/2021 6:52:09 PM PDT by algore

Despotism (1946)

"You can roughly locate any community in the world somewhere along a scale running all the way from democracy to despotism", so begins this short from Encyclopaedia Britannica Films, published a year after the end of the Second World War.

The film goes on to illustrate (with some wonderful graphics, archive clips, and reconstructions) the idea that despotism has two chief characteristics β€” restricted respect and concentrated power.

A community is low on a respect scale if common courtesy is withheld from large groups of people on account of their political attitudes; if people are rude to others because they think their wealth and position gives them that right, or because they don't like a man's race or his religion.

It also identifies two of the conditions which have historically promoted the growth of despotism β€” a slanted economic distribution and a strict control of the agencies of communication.

One commenter on the Internet Archive has this quite salient point to make:

A very interesting film that has one major flaw. Distraction rather than control is the key to the Despotism of Huxley's "Brave New World".

The information scale is pushed through the roof to the point of trivialization which paradoxically results in the *quality* of the information going through the floor.

Critical thinking is crippled not so much by control but by overload.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: despot; despotism
starts out a little slow,

but well worth the 9 minutes to understand how far down the scales they might think we are today

1 posted on 10/20/2021 6:52:09 PM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: algore

They’ve put together an interesting measure, but when the focus shifts to the dangers of private property and uneven economic distribution—my guard goes up.

But thanks for sharing.


2 posted on 10/20/2021 7:17:18 PM PDT by Bogle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogle

It seemed like they thought it dangerous for billionaires, royalty or real estate trusts vs individual citizens to own most property..


3 posted on 10/20/2021 7:25:43 PM PDT by algore ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: algore

Interesting, but the idea that the rich should pay more is right out of communism. They ignore the fact that rich people will spend more on non-necessities which provide jobs for the less wealthy. Yes, the rich can afford luxury cars and yachts and fine homes, but SOMEONE who isn’t rich has to make them.

I doubt that very many people would kill the goose that laid the golden egg. But then that is exactly what many socialists would do.


4 posted on 10/20/2021 7:40:06 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (When elections fail, we will either live under tyranny or rebel and throw it off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

Bump


5 posted on 10/21/2021 4:29:34 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Rom 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore
β€œToo much capitalism does not mean too many capitalists, but too few capitalists.”

- G.K. Chesterton

6 posted on 10/21/2021 4:33:10 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson