Posted on 03/08/2014 6:07:03 AM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome
So when did Ann's and Obama Sr.'s "whatever happened happened fast" wedding happen? For no apparent reason, confusion abounds among Obama's biographers over the wedding date:
1. Dreams claims that Ann and Obama Sr. were in married "in 1960"; similarly, Mendell's 2007 book claims that the couple were married "sometime in late 1960" when they "slipped off alone to the island of Maui"; and both Obamaland (2008) by Ron Jacobs (with contributor David Maraniss) and a 2007 Washington Post article claim that the two were married "late in 1960."
2. A 2007 Chicago Tribune article vaguely claims that Ann and Obama Sr. were married "six months before" Barack's birth on Aug 4, 1961 -- or, in other words, sometime in early 1961.
3. An April 2008 Time article by Amanda Ripley, as does Maraniss's August 2008 article, gives a specific date of February 2, 1961 for the wedding, apparently based on Ann's and Obama Sr.'s 1964 divorce records – mysteriously appearing on the web. But since fake documents have been known to appear on the web, Obama's biographers, Ripley and Maraniss, might want to verify the 1964 divorce documents – especially since a Feb. 2, 1961 marriage date for "Ann and Obama Sr." wasn't reported in any Honolulu Advertiser or Honolulu Star-Bulletin marriage lists from February 1961. Take the February 8, 1961 Star-Bulletin, which listed eighteen marriages from Feb. 3, Feb. 4, and Feb. 6, and no Feb. 2 marriages, and the February 7, 1961 Advertiser, which listed eleven marriages from Feb. 2 to 4, including two Feb. 2 marriages.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
That’s the problem. How could she? So if the same hand drew these signatures, then how can it be explained? I’m not saying they did; I’m just noting the similarities. We suspect already that the signature on the Obama birth certificate was imported from somewhere. Where was that? It’s just a little curiosity.
The hand that signed the divorce papers, IMO, is the same as the forged LFBC. In fact I am almost sure that the divorce papers signature is the origin of the LFBC signature.
What is the “CCP”?
Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse which has been investigating the real background of Zero aka “0bama”, and any crimes committed in the attempt to cover up what his real life was. I am sure someone else can give a better definition.
That makes sense. I would assume that it is likely that SAD signed the divorce papers herself, but of course was not around a few years ago to sign the spanking new birth certificate. But then why did the forger have to do her name in bits?
Because she only signed "D" for Dunham. So they pulled a unham from somewhere else.
I see, thank you.
In Maricopa county Arpiao has had this Cold Case Posse in existence for some time. When Tea Party members, some 250, signed a petition to have Sheriff Joe "look" into the LFBC as a forgery he agreed and gave it to his CCP with the intention of "clreaing" the pResident, but something happened along the way and here we are....
From Vernon, Texas school record.
The BC for Stanley Ann, somewhat clearer?
http://www.ssnvalidator.com/pages/results.aspx
And then there's the possibility that the divorce on record is OBAMA vs OBAMA - dated March 1961, and it was ANN OBAMA who divorced him; the document you have been shown isn't what you think it is. It could be a divorce between the Ann S Obama who was listed in the Polk in 1961, who wasn't Stanley Ann.
Wild? You bet it is. Didn't Frank Marshall maintain an african student got TWO BLONDES pregnant? Anything is possible. Why did 'Dreams' need to weave both ANN and ANNA into the story and make it appear as if Stanley Ann Dunham had THREE NAMES?
So, both his parents were citizens, thus he would be eligible to be President. Be careful with your theories. You have to think them through.
But, being adopted indoneasian as a minor does not eliminate him from claiming US citizenship.
All that is rather moot while you don’t know when and where he was born or who his parents were.
Birth Cert & SS App. compared.
Thank you, GregNH. And the reason it’s called the “Cold” Case Posse is because any crimes that might turn up in the investigation were “cold”, as in committed some time in the past. IOW, no “hot” trail to follow.
Hmm. I thought it likely that the divorce was so that SAD could gain legal custody of the child. So those divorce papers could have been an earlier date, and a different woman. Isn’t there a date on the papers sent to the Kenyan in Bostion?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.