Posted on 02/26/2014 7:33:18 AM PST by Seizethecarp
Shrimpton reported Obama's purported mom was not pregnant in 1961 and that Obama was born in Kenya in 1960. He said Kenya was under British intelligence files and that Obama's father ran guns for the Mau Mau. He then dropped a bombshell claiming the CIA did covert DNA testing on Obama at a fundraising dinner and the test came back with no match to the claimed grandparents. Shrimpton said Rudy Giuliani's people knew and sat on the intelligence and further stated he spoke with Hillary Clinton's people and that they were quite interested.
(Excerpt) Read more at birtherreport.com ...
REJECTION OF OBAMA BY THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE
By Michael Shrimpton 9th November 2012
“I recommend people read the comments here at this source link:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=228642
“Some of the comments are very interesting, and some are funny.”
I heartily support WildHighlander57’s recommendation that FReepers read the comments to Shrimpton’s Nov. 2012 article, many of which are used by Shrimpton to elaborate extensively on the subject.
Especially when you say:
I don’t know about CIA - when I was there as a contractor, they seemed very bureaucratic and liberal. CIA hates Congress. If someone knew something about Obama, I think he or she’d most likely want to sit on it.
That may be exactly what happened!
If all this happened several years ago CIA may have been sitting on this info just like Hillary and who knows how many others "have been sitting on it."
I think you hit it.
Thanks for the ping. This doesn’t sound very likely. Maybe it’s disinformation. But I’ll file it with all the rest.
Here’s the bio from post 404
Xxxxxx
MICHAEL SHRIMPTON - BIO
Michael Shrimpton was born on 9th March 1957 in the RAF Hospital, Ely, in Cambridgeshire, the son of an RAF fighter pilot and a former RAF nursing sister. Brought up in Australia, where his family emigrated after his father took up a second career as an Air Traffic Controller, Michael returned to England to study law in 1978.
He graduated with honours from the University of Wales in 1981 and was elected President of the Union of University College Cardiff the same year. He was called to the Bar by Gray’s Inn in 1983. Whilst at university he joined the RAFVR’s University of Wales Air Squadron, flying first solo in 1979 on the Bulldog T Mk. 1.
Originally a member of the Labour Party and a Parliamentary Candidate in 1987 he defected to the Tory Party on the issue of Europe in 1997. He has always been opposed to UK membership of the EU.
In 1999/2000 he represented the late General Pinochet in successful negotiations in Washington with inter alia the late Lt-Gen Vernon Walters, formerly Deputy Director of the CIA, ensuring the general’s return to Chile. After that he was increasingly drawn into the intelligence world, representing intelligence officers and providing analysis to governments and intelligence agencies.
After 9-11 he appeared on specialist counter-terrorism panels in Washington and LA with former general and flag officers. His analysis on the true pilot training of the 9-11 pilots has never been seriously challenged within INTELCOM. He assisted both Joint Congressional Inquiry into 9-11 and met with a member of the 9-11 Commission in Washington.
Michael has briefed staffers on the House Foreign Relations Committee and the Senate Intelligence Committee. He was a frequent visitor to the Pentagon in the Bush-Cheney years. He was a speaker at the inaugural Intelligence Conference (Intelcon) in 2005 and the Intelligence Summit in 2006, after which he was flown out to the USS Enterprise at sea by the US Navy, as part of their Distinguished Visitor Program. He is one of comparatively few British civilians to have completed a carrier landing and catapult take-off cycle from a US nuclear-powered aircraft carrier.
In 2006 he was appointed to the Adjunct Faculty of the American Military University, where he taught on the Masters in Strategic Intelligence Program. He has been a sometime member of the Royal United Services Institute, the Military Commentators Circle, the International Institute of Strategic Studies and Chatham House. He has published in the national security field and in 2010 took an 18 month sabbatical to write his ground-breaking intelligence text Spyhunter.
He has a wide range of defence and intelligence contacts. Although mostly concerned with intelligence analysis, teaching and writing Michael has popped up in the occasional hotspot, such as the West Bank, the Golan Heights and Israeli-Lebanese frontier. He has travelled widely, including Eastern Europe and has visited over 35 US states, including Alaska.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/05...oup-complicit/
Many years ago, around the days of Vietnam, I used to know several of the top guys in the CIA, and heard a bit of talk in the evening. And many years later I heard from one of these guys grandsons, at a beach barbecue, that his grandfather had been on the board of Air America, which among other things did the drug smuggling from the Golden Triangle during the Vietnam War years. Supposedly to help pay for the war and ingratiate allies.
All I’ll say about it is that, back then at least, all the top guys seemed to be Ivy Leaguers. And as you say, they were basically liberals. Liberals of privilege.
Also have them read the comments at the birther report link at your first post.
There’s a comment by Mr shrimpton that I posted upthread.
Also in the comments is Ms trow bridge, whose theory is.... familiar ;)
“Sort of looks like he reacted to soviet warning unlike the US ignoring their warnings about the Boston bombers”
Shrimpton may have been subjected to punishment for embarrassing the UK authorities over numerous issues. Doing internet searches I don’t see any further stories since the mid-2013 article on these bomb plant charges seeming to indicate that charges may have been dropped.
“Also in the comments is Ms trow bridge, whose theory is.... familiar ;)”
I prefer not to go there!
Pinging all y’all to Mr shrimpton’s comments.
I hear ya!
Thing is, Mr shrimpton’s points refute Ms. T’s claims.
He says there’s info supporting bho SR paternity and a kenyan birth from these sources: Nairobi; audio recordings; interviews with Edwards, Hillary, and McCain campaigners.
She doesn’t say what/who are her sources.
A debate between the two would be most interesting!
“Thing is, Mr shrimpton’s points refute Ms. T’s claims.”
OK. I was getting nervous there. I read those comments on BR late last night. Very interesting.
While checking those comments be aware of this guy. Note his comment
Xxxxx
The Rahnameh
Nov 12 - 9:09 am
Kudos, Steve. His misinterpretation of the Constitution and laughable attempt to pretend he would be in the feeding chain for such information re: background tests on the sitting POTUS is cute — at most.
•
Michael Shrimpton’s biggest problem with Obama is that Obama is about to put a haymaker in the eye of Zion.
many thanks for the link in #393.
I remember someone upthread asking about newspaper articles dealing with 0’s kenya birth, and that you were looking for them.
I found this scribd collection link in the comments to the birther report:
This “rahnameh” person made that comment about 0 “putting a haymaker....” ??!!??
It’s been pointed put many times that he doesn’t look like the Kenyan, and now we’re to believe that he’s of the Kenyan, but not a Dunham?
_________________
Perhaps they could get the grandmother’s DNA because she was still living, but not the grandfather’s because he was deceased. The mitochondrial DNA doesn’t match. They have no example for the Y chromosome. So they can rule out Madelyn but can’t say anything for sure about Stanley Armour Dunham.
But—Shrimpton goes on to say that a half-sister who was in the UK at one time is believed to be a full sister, which means she and Barry have the same two biological parents. He has only two half-sisters that we know of: Maya and Auma. Which one lived in the UK?
Yes. How did he know?
Rah-name- h. ????
Googled it. Lots of posts in _______
Remember, Sheriff Joe says only that the documents are spurious. He takes great pains to DRAW NO CONCLUSIONS.
Here?
Can’t remember if it was Berg or someone else who said they initially took the information they had to both FBI and CIA. And got the same response. The information the had gathered was just a smidgen compared to what they knew about 0.
We discussed at great length why they didn’t come forward. The conclusion was that LEO can only testify in front of grand jury or other judicial forum. They must work as sherif Joe needs to do thru those systems. They cannot work alone
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.