Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WE'RE ALL BIRTHERS NOW: The Long-Form Obama Birth Certificate DOES NOT EXIST
Reaganite Republican ^ | January 26, 2011 | Reaganite Republican

Posted on 01/26/2011 5:57:29 AM PST by Reaganite Republican

Hawai'i election official's sworn affadavit: 
"No Obama birth certificate exists"


ALL Americans who support our nation's Constitution and election laws must now ask: WHERE IS IT? As the Obama birth certificate controversy drags-on, any unbiased observer could tell you that events are strengthening the birthers' case by the day... not the other way around.

Oczam's razor theory dictates that if they can't find it... there must not be one. This would also provide the most viable explanation for why Obama has spent almost $2M fighting the claims in court. And to since it's a principle requirement for presidential eligibility... would someone please tell me WHY the burden of proof is on us

How'd this guy even get a passport without a long-form birth certificate, anyway...

"During the course of my employment," Adams swears in the affidavit (viewable in full as part 1 and part 2), "I became aware that many requests were being made to the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division, the Hawaii Office of Elections, and the Hawaii Department of Health from around the country to obtain a copy of then-Senator Barack Obama's long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate." 

As he inquired about the birth certificate, he says, his supervisors told him that the records were not on file at the Hawaii Department of Health. "Senior officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division told me on multiple occasions that no Hawaii long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Senator Obama in the Hawaii Department of Health," Adams' affidavit reads, "and there was no record that any such document had ever been on file in the Hawaii Department of Health or any other branch or department of the Hawaii government." 

Tim Adams
Tim Adams, former senior elections clerk for Honolulu In a recorded telephone interview, Adams told WND that it was common knowledge among election officials where he worked that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate could be found at the Hawaii Department of Health. "My supervisor came and told me, 'Of course, there's no birth certificate. What? You stupid,'" Adams said. "She usually spoke well, but in saying this she reverted to a Hawaiian dialect. I really didn't know how to respond to that. She said it and just walked off. She was quite a powerful lady." 

Moreover, Adams was told that neither Queens Memorial Hospital nor Kapi'olani Medical Center had any records of Obama's birth at their medical facilities: "Senior officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division further told me on multiple occasions that Hawaii State government officials had made inquires about Sen. Obama's birth records to officials at Queens Medical Center and Kapi'olani Medical Center in Honolulu and that neither hospital had any record of Senator Obama having been born there, even though Governor Abercrombie is now asserting and various Hawaii government officials continue to assert Barack Obama Jr. was born at Kapi'olani Medical Center on Aug. 4, 1961." 

"We called the two hospitals in Honolulu: Queens and Kapi'olani," Adams stressed. "Neither of them have any records that Barack Obama was born there."


The debate has been recently been amplified by Hawaii's weird hippy Governor Neil Abercrombie -a far-Left freak who was previously a member of the US House Progressive Caucus and a personal friend and college classmate of both of Obama's parents. Abercrombie  made an ill-advised claim during his 2010 gubernatorial campaign that he would soon put a rest to all this, stating he was on a  "mission" to "quell" the birthers- as the polemic has "implications for 2012 that we simply cannot have."

But there is no Obama birth certificate... there never was.  So now he's hiding behind Hawaii's state AG, who says there is a privacy law that prohibits Abercrombie from doing as he promised (unless Obama gave him permission, of course):

State Attorney General David Louie told the governor that privacy laws bar him from disclosing an individual’s birth documentation without the person’s consent, Abercrombie spokeswoman Donalyn Dela Cruz said Friday.

“There is nothing more that Gov. Abercrombie can do within the law to produce a document,” said Dela Cruz. 

“Unfortunately, there are conspirators who will continue to question the citizenship of our president.” 

Conspirators! That's rich- but condescension and slander coming from nervous Dems does little to re-assure thinking persons that this man is acutally qualified to be US President: on the contrary, this defensive, diversionary behavior speaks volumes. Clearly those propping up this Trojan Horse of a president have nothing left but mocking the inquisitors- but as Margaret Thatcher once said: "... if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left." And indeed they do not-


Delving a little farther back, Obama even admitted himself that he wasn't qualified for the presidency in the 2004 Keyes-Obama Senate campaign debate, but the video of this was scrubbed from YouTube, according to Good Ole Boy at RealAmericanPolitics

Keyes caught him off guard... and Obama spilled:

I watched the entire first and second debates.  I distinctly remember that I had never heard of Obama; my interest was in seeing what Keyes said about the pro-life issue and school vouchers.

At one point in the second debate, Keyes, accused Obama saying, “You are not even a natural born citizen!”
To which Obama immediately replied, “So what? I am running for Illinois Senator, not the presidency.”

At the end of the airing of the second debate, the C-Span host noted, as he read from a single sheet of paper, placed before him, that the Obama Campaign had contacted them and requested them to point out to their viewers that Obama’s response here should not be understood as a denial that he is a natural born citizen, only that Keyes’ accusation had nothing to do with the qualifications of office of a U.S. Senator...

Today... with even Chris Matthews saying "why not just put it out?"- I unapologetically throw my hat in with the birthers... time to cough it up or step-down, Barry. Even is some obscure court ruling keeps Obama in office... this man must not be allowed to run for re-election in 2012. 

And when the day comes when we remove this tumor from the neck of the American eagle... Obama and his accomplices must be punished harshly for not just violation of oath, but the myriad crimes committed in covering-up lack of qualification for US president, up to and including perjury. And that means the entire Obama campaign team, lawyers, and most of the DNC... you're all going to pay dearly for this one.

Get on the stick, GOP congressman... 
where's the subpoenas? 

The survival of American democracy demands justice- and so do we.
Moonbattery   Real American Politics   Weasel Zippers   
WND   SadHill   Wikipedia   Post and Mail

More reactionary diatribes at Reaganite Republican


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: abercrombie; barry; birthcertificate; birthers; certificate; certifigate; eligibility; hawaii; naturalborncitizen; obama; soetoro
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 521-538 next last
To: Flamenco Lady

Excellent!


381 posted on 01/27/2011 2:29:23 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: LorenC

Yes, but Dog Gone was arguing to his position. His use of ‘or’ is his own willfulness — the Constitution and the meaning of the term of the Law of Nations known to the Framers at the time have no such ‘or’.

Nevertheless Dog Gone did not use the term “citizenship of the mother” or “citizenship of the parent”, instead he used “citizenship of the parents”, both parents.

At the time that the Constitution was written and ratified citizenship descended through one parent — the father when the parents where known, or the mother when the father was unknown. Under modern interpretation, by the use of the plural Dog Gone seems to have indicated that when child is born abroad, BOTH parents must be citizens. That seems right to me!


382 posted on 01/27/2011 2:34:53 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Knowing the lawyers and law firms who are involved, the $2mm estimate for his spending is very low. It looks to me as though we can see around $10mm of legal effort expended in defense of his position--maybe more. How do you justify that estimate? Out of 60+ eligibility lawsuits, Obama's personal attorneys defended only 3 lawsuits. Of those 3, Perkins Coie defended only 2. (Berg v. Obama and Hollister v. Soetoro) By December of 2009, they made a total of 8 filings. The DOJ provided the defense in the majority of the remaining cases. The others were dismissed sua sponte. Are you suggesting that 2 lawsuits cost Obama $10m?

No.

But Perkins drove the proceeding in many of the cases where they did not appear as counsel. You don't suppose the Perkins lawyer who became the clerk for the Judge in Santa Ana did that for nominal clerk's compensation--I assume Perkins made up the difference.

Maybe you also count some of the costs of government employees--Bob Bauer didn't stop being lead counsel when he went to the White House; and I doubt that he took much of a real paycut when he did so either.

Matter of fact with 60 cases for which they were ultimately responsible, $166,666 seems cheap.

And the litigator looking at this kind of an effort from the outside doesn't see all the peripheral effort that is involved in other proceedings that are not court actions that must be coordinated with litigation pending and threatened to avoid action or events that would prejudice the litigation threat.

At this point, I view my $10mm as probably light.

383 posted on 01/27/2011 2:37:07 PM PST by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: LorenC; curiosity; Danae; Elderberry; Flamenco Lady; conservativegrandma; bvw; Red Steel

I will stipulate to LorenC’s timeframe on the two-citizen parent argument. I’ve been following the eligibility issue from the beginning. Leo Donofrio’s analysis was the first time I remember reading about that aspect of Obama’s eligibility.

To the question about why no one brought it up earlier when it was widely known that Obama’s father was a Kenyan, I believe the answer is that none of us had extensive knowledge of the definition of NBC, had researched the FF’s intent, or reviewed SCOTUS citzenship cases. I had always assumed that one must only be born here to be NBC, which would include anchor babies.

For a short while, many fell for Polarik’s trap (including me) and we were focused on that aspect of the issue. When I dug into the issue and came across Leo’s analysis, I was hooked. It made the most sense to me. And it still does. The two citizen parent definition also prevents anchor babies from being NBCs.


384 posted on 01/27/2011 2:38:34 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: LorenC; curiosity; Danae; Elderberry; Flamenco Lady; conservativegrandma; bvw; Red Steel

I will stipulate to LorenC’s timeframe on the two-citizen parent argument. I’ve been following the eligibility issue from the beginning. Leo Donofrio’s analysis was the first time I remember reading about that aspect of Obama’s eligibility.

To the question about why no one brought it up earlier when it was widely known that Obama’s father was a Kenyan, I believe the answer is that none of us had extensive knowledge of the definition of NBC, had researched the FF’s intent, or reviewed SCOTUS citzenship cases. I had always assumed that one must only be born here to be NBC, which would include anchor babies.

For a short while, many fell for Polarik’s trap (including me) and we were focused on that aspect of the issue. When I dug into the issue and came across Leo’s analysis, I was hooked. It made the most sense to me. And it still does. The two citizen parent definition also prevents anchor babies from being NBCs.


385 posted on 01/27/2011 2:38:46 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: David
People really don't understand the legal process--most of what happens in this kind of a legal battle doesn't get translated into pages filed.

I equated the big price tag because of overpriced lefty lawyers who saw a big piggy bank by taping the millions $$$ that are leftover in Obama's campaign fund.

"Cash on Hand: $15,466,043
Debts: $434,954
Date of last report: Dec 31 2008 12:00AM "


Obama lawyers were hearing - Ca-ching!

386 posted on 01/27/2011 2:38:55 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan; LucyT
Of those 3, Perkins Coie defended only 2. (Berg v. Obama and Hollister v. Soetoro) By December of 2009, they made a total of 8 filings.

And incidentally, I didn't point my entire $10mm at Perkins either--there were a number of law firms involved besides Perkins as well as ancillary investigators and other service providers.

387 posted on 01/27/2011 2:42:01 PM PST by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Excellent. Obvious why a dual citizen is not a natural born citizen.


388 posted on 01/27/2011 2:45:06 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: David
You don't suppose the Perkins lawyer who became the clerk for the Judge in Santa Ana did that for nominal clerk's compensation

I think your definition of "nominal" must differ from mine. Because given his two years in the private sector, Velamoor's starting salary as a federal clerk would've been about $70,000.

389 posted on 01/27/2011 2:50:58 PM PST by LorenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Another gem of an article: http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/09/obamas-impending-pearl-harbor/

“Obama’s Impending Pearl Harbor
By Larry JohnsoncloseAuthor: Larry Johnson Name: Larry Johnson
Email: larry_johnson@earthlink.net
Site: http://NoQuarterUSA.net

About: Larry C. Johnson is a former analyst at the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, who moved subsequently in 1989 to the U.S. Department of State, where he served four years as the deputy director for transportation security, antiterrorism assistance training, and special operations in the State Department’s Office of Counterterrorism. He left government service in October 1993 and set up a consulting business. He currently is the co-owner and CEO of BERG Associates, LLC (Business Exposure Reduction Group) and is an expert in the fields of terrorism, aviation security, and crisis and risk management, and money laundering investigations. Johnson is the founder and main author of No Quarter, a weblog that addresses issues of terrorism and intelligence and politics. NoQuarterUSA was nominated as Best Political Blog of 2008.See Authors Posts (1479) on August 9, 2008 at 11:22 PM in Backtrack Obama, Citizenship, Current Affairs, Democratic Nomination, Whitey Tape

After a very productive time (working, not playing) in Hawaii, I believe that the Japanese attack at Pearl Harbor is an apt metaphor for what awaits Barack Obama if he becomes the Democrat’s official nominee. Michelle’s “whitey” tape and the controversy over his birth certificate are the least of his concerns. Opponents of Obama and some proponents of McCain have acquired information that will rapidly erase any memory of the audacity and perfidy of John Edwards.

The “surprise” attack by the Japanese should not have caught the US fleet at Pearl Harbor unawares. There were advanced warnings that people in key positions ignored or shrugged off as unimportant. Well, guess what boys and girls? Similar warnings are now in the hands of the Democratic leadership and they are choosing to ignore the flashing red lights that signal danger ahead.

Just today, courtesy of the Rocky Mountain News, we confirmed that Barack aka Barry Soetoro Obama was a citizen of Kenya since 1963. Barack has yet to stipulate when he renounced or relinquished that citizenship. That will be a distracting issue in the upcoming campaign. Americans don’t want to elect a Kenyan as President. It is that simple.

But then there is the Indonesian problem and his Hawaiian birth certificate.

I confirmed today that several teams/individuals visited Jakarta during the last six months to gather up critical documents regarding Barack. It is amazing what money can buy. The information includes details of how Barack made his way to Pakistan. Oh! Did I mention there have been similar efforts underway in Pakistan. There are several lessons and warnings in the John Edwards affair for Obama. First and foremost, you cannot hide your past.

Did I also mention how small Hawaii is? Republican operatives, with help from their own island backers, have unearthed critical information on Obama and are just biding their time until after the convention to drop it on him. Such as? Having a birth certificate that lists you as Barry Soetoro.

Barack aka Barry Soetoro might have escaped scrutiny back in 1960 when there was no internet. Controlling information back then was so much easier. Not today. It is there for the taking and the Democrats foolishly chose to trust this clown just as they trusted John Edwards.

Who would have thought that John Edwards and his wife would be so arrogant and so disconnected with reality that they would embark on a presidential campaign even though they knew about his affair and the crazy nature of his paramour. Well, that kind of audacity and bamboozlement is not limited to the Edwards family. Meet the Obamas. You don’t know them? Don’t worry, Republican operatives are loaded for bear and you are going to meet a Barack Obama that was hidden and disguised during the Democratic primary. And when the introduction is over the Obama supporters will wish the only thing they had to worry about was a video with Michelle saying disparaging things about caucasians.

Dems. You’ve been warned. Don’t be surprised when the attacks come.”


390 posted on 01/27/2011 2:51:53 PM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais is beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies]

To: David
Matter of fact with 60 cases for which they were ultimately responsible, $166,666 seems cheap.

Obama didn't have attorneys, private or federal, in most of the eligibility cases. Most were filed in state courts with folks like the local Secretary of State as the defendant.

391 posted on 01/27/2011 2:55:18 PM PST by LorenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: Electric Graffiti

The long-form BC is not required by any law. Would you likewise argue that Obama used DOJ attorneys by choice in other lawsuits against him that demanded some action that he’s not required to perform?


392 posted on 01/27/2011 2:58:32 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: David; LucyT

Yes, I know you didn’t. Thus my question.

However, Obama had private attorneys for only three of the 60+ eligibility lawsuits.


393 posted on 01/27/2011 3:09:38 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

Wow! I wonder if that $100 will get ALL of the documents they have on file for him at that dept. Original (if any), amendment(s) (if any), etc.


394 posted on 01/27/2011 3:09:57 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

“Can a dual citizen be a Natural Born Citizen?”

No! The US State Department explains why.

“...dual nationals owe allegiance to both the United States and the foreign country.”

http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1753.html

And WTF is wrong with this website?


395 posted on 01/27/2011 3:10:45 PM PST by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
Furthermore, as was questioned in the other thread...

Has anybody requested Barry Soetoro’s BC?

An excellent question/point.

396 posted on 01/27/2011 3:13:00 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan; LorenC; curiosity
Don't be so fast to so stipulate. The Dual Loyalty at birth -- one parent not a citizen, being a case thereof -- aspect was also breached on the Long Tread started 3 July 2008.

P-Marlowe brought it up at 246 a few hours into the thread:

[In reference to a discussion of the US statutory criterion for citizenship] Let us not forget that the US Code does not define the Constitution. The Constitution defines itself in accordance with the intentions of the framers.

I am certain that the founders wanted to ensure that the president of the United States did not have mixed loyalties and hence the requirement of being a Natural Born Citizen would imply that the person must be born under the sovereign jurisdiction of the United States of America. I am not certain that simply because Obama's mother was a United States Citizen, that makes any child she bears while domiciled outside the United States a "Natural Born Citizen".


397 posted on 01/27/2011 3:21:36 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Your post from 2008 mentioned above.


398 posted on 01/27/2011 3:22:31 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

unless you can get a release from barry or he is over 75 years old i dont think you could get one in Hawaii if they had it.


399 posted on 01/27/2011 3:24:31 PM PST by rolling_stone ( *this makes Watergate look like a kiddie pool*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

The trick will be to see if this passes or they get a phone call from Barry telling them to knock it off..as for $100 first one to get one posts it on the net...lol..


400 posted on 01/27/2011 3:26:47 PM PST by rolling_stone ( *this makes Watergate look like a kiddie pool*Well th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 521-538 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson