Posted on 01/26/2011 5:57:29 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
When did SADO dump Barry on her parents? 1970-71?
What was his status then.....I saw his name in the year books as Barry Obama.
Now my head is spinning.
The only thing that doesn’t pass the smell test is you claiming to know the contents of every book ever used in schools in the last 100 years and to know what was taught in every school in the country over the last 100 years with regard to the “natural born citizen” clause.
To use your own words “Sorry, there’s no way that is true.” I don’t think anyone would beleive your statements in theis regard are true! God knows, but you certainly do not!
We ladies have only attested to our own real life experiences that occurred before you were even born with regard to what we were taught in school about the “natural born citizen” clause. I do know that in my case I am not lying, and I am more inclined to believe the other ladies since they are only attesting to their own experiences and they are similar to my own.
Since by your own admission you were not even alive in the 1960’s and I had in fact already graduated from high school before you were even born, the liklihood of my remembering what was taught to me is far greater than the liklihood of your knowing what was contained in every textbook used to teach civics classes, and knowing what was taught in every school in this country over the last 100 years.
Oh and by the way, go back and read your history. There have been objections to presidential candidates running for the president with regard to this clause as far back as Chester A. Arthur who may have also been elected as president and been technically “ineligible” due to the “natural born citizen” clause but at the time it could not be verified one way or the other. There have been objections to other presidential candidates as well including John McCain who I personally do not think was eligible either since he was technically born at a hospital that was not in the U.S. even though it is clear he would not have had divided loyalties to more than one country.
Proto-hippie Ann Durham?
You gotta be kidding me... diplomat! lol
More like Soviet agent... obviously
Knowing the lawyers and law firms who are involved, the $2mm estimate for his spending is very low. It looks to me as though we can see around $10mm of legal effort expended in defense of his position--maybe more.
A second important point is that we need to distinguish between a birth certificate argument and the issue of whether or not he was born anywhere in the US.
It has been apparent for some time; I believe the anonymous former employee who released copies of the documents in the Hawaii records file through the midwest lawyer two years ago is credible; there is no long form birth certificate to be had or found in Hawaii.
He wasn't born there in August of 1961--and a birth file was established in the name of Barrack H. 0bama II on August 8, 1961 without a birth certificate.
I will also say as I have elsewhere, that it appears to me as though the Smith Birth Certificate is a credible original record attesting to the birth of 0bama II in Mombasa on August 4, 1961.
[snip]
It appears to me that there is a fair line of analysis that the current occupant of the White House was substituted into the identity of 0bama II sometime in late 1970.
Read more at # 236.
Thanks, David.
Your scenario explains Barak Obama’s 1971 Christmas visit.
I believe that the Dunhams paid off Barak Obama to adopt/re-adopt Barry back. That it was necvessary to reorganize Barry’s “paperwork.”
There is absolutely no other explanation for Barak’s visit.
http://www.theobamafile.com/_family/Senior.htm#ChristmasVisit
In the divorce decree, it’s inferred. It said “the parties” meaning Ann and Lolo had a child who was no longer a minor and then Maya is listed also as theirs. Obama would have been referred to as a step-child. Not to mention, BHO was known as Barry Soetoro in Indonesia.
Actually, Arthur was eleccted Vice President. He was Veep when Garfield was shot. Arthur never filled the Veep spot.
He is called the accidental president both for that reason, and for the reason that he didn’t run for the office to begin with. His name got onto the ticket through a series of back room deals in the Nomination process. He was considered a safe choice. He had never been vetted before that, as he wasn’t a serious player in the highest politics of the day.
When a child is adopted, they are not legally step-Children. THe law sees them as children born of that parent. This is why Barry got Lolo’s citizenship and Nationality, it is an automatic part of the adoption process.
The spook term is "cut out", and Barry has every hallmark of being one.
The CIA and KGB do some amazing work, but nobody's spook tactics are good enough to hide the true profile of the most famous man on Earth forever. The cracks show up around the edges, and the whole things crumbles to dust. It would have already if we didn't have The Government Media Department covering for the little creep.
Speaking of smell tests, you stink like a lousy obot troll.
It appears to me that there is a fair line of analysis that the current occupant of the White House was substituted into the identity of 0bama II sometime in late 1970.
Where's baby Barry?
.
What about place of birth?
Thank you for your post. I was aware that Arthur was the accidental president. I was responding to another poster who tried to tell me that no other president or vice presidential candidate’s eligibility had ever been questioned until the fall of 2008. I should have said that there have been eligibility concerns for presidents and vice presidents back at least as far as Chester A Arthur.
Thank you for the pings!
;)
It was raised here on Free Republic before the 2008 election.
The document you posted recently (was it only yesterday?). That I said I think is authentic. Maybe you could post it on this thread?
How do you justify that estimate? Out of 60+ eligibility lawsuits, Obama's personal attorneys defended only 3 lawsuits. Of those 3, Perkins Coie defended only 2. (Berg v. Obama and Hollister v. Soetoro) By December of 2009, they made a total of 8 filings.
The DOJ provided the defense in the majority of the remaining cases. The others were dismissed sua sponte.
Are you suggesting that 2 lawsuits cost Obama $10m?
You are so exposed as an 0h0m0 toadying suckup that you fool no one - absolutely no one - except your feeble self.
The fact that anyone even replies to you to provide information shows that such people have the patience of Job.
You’re a nasty little liar.
;) No worries, I just did a research paper on him not too long ago. So I have a ton of information on the man.
I was trying to stay neutral. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.