Knowing the lawyers and law firms who are involved, the $2mm estimate for his spending is very low. It looks to me as though we can see around $10mm of legal effort expended in defense of his position--maybe more.
A second important point is that we need to distinguish between a birth certificate argument and the issue of whether or not he was born anywhere in the US.
It has been apparent for some time; I believe the anonymous former employee who released copies of the documents in the Hawaii records file through the midwest lawyer two years ago is credible; there is no long form birth certificate to be had or found in Hawaii.
He wasn't born there in August of 1961--and a birth file was established in the name of Barrack H. 0bama II on August 8, 1961 without a birth certificate.
I will also say as I have elsewhere, that it appears to me as though the Smith Birth Certificate is a credible original record attesting to the birth of 0bama II in Mombasa on August 4, 1961.
[snip]
It appears to me that there is a fair line of analysis that the current occupant of the White House was substituted into the identity of 0bama II sometime in late 1970.
Read more at # 236.
Thanks, David.
The spook term is "cut out", and Barry has every hallmark of being one.
The CIA and KGB do some amazing work, but nobody's spook tactics are good enough to hide the true profile of the most famous man on Earth forever. The cracks show up around the edges, and the whole things crumbles to dust. It would have already if we didn't have The Government Media Department covering for the little creep.
It appears to me that there is a fair line of analysis that the current occupant of the White House was substituted into the identity of 0bama II sometime in late 1970.
Where's baby Barry?
.
I haven't been out of the country or my computer shut down, however, this the first time I've read this!!!
Have I missed something. - Who, where, when did this take place, source???