Just ten minutes a day...Ping.
nice!
Hi Polarik,
I can’t get this particular video to load, though I have successfully viewed others on your site.
The blacks and neo-Marxist could not care less where Obambie was born.
Son of Britain is still NOT ELIGIBLE.
OUTSTANDING work Polarik! The 1st video link stopped at 8:13 and other places but I moved the time cursor and was able to hit the start button and see the rest of it. Thanks.
“Everything about socialism is sham and affectation.” 23.11 Ch.23 Evil “Economic Harmonies”; Frederic Bastiat 1801-1850
bump for later
Did that border appaer on any other legal documents from Hawaii?
BTTT!
Please explain why anyone would go to that much trouble to forge a document that Hawaii provides on self-swearing alone...using the information provided by the applicant.
This has absolutely nothing to do with who obama is or why he refuses to produce an actual long form BC. Furthermore, everyone in the entire state of Hawaii is not corrupt. If there was an actual forgery, someone would be all over it like a fly on sh!t.
It doesn’t need to be a forgery to be a fraud.
This is a red herring. You are NOT court vetted, as you claim, and I wonder what your personal interest is in promoting this version, different from your old version, and really, REALLY different from the way you literally slimed a good freeper who provided an UNFORGED scan of an actual COLB right here on FR which you deemed a forgery, a fake, a fraud, when it wasn’t.
You had everybody here at each others’ throats and you enjoyed it. You are trying to make this all about you which does a complete disservice to everybody here who has done actual legitimate research on everything obama from day one.
In other words, this is completely irrelevant and you are trying to make it relevant. Why? Who gains from this?
Why have you decided to make FR your headquarters for this? Are you deliberatly trying to take FR down your rabbit hole and discredit all the legitimate work that has been done here by throwing this farce out there and telling everyone to follow you here so you can make FR a laughing stock?
Have you donated a single red cent to FR for using it as your private headquarters to advertise this silliness?
And if you even DARE to call me an obama supporter for challenging you as you have done to anyone else who has challenged you, you better think twice about it.
Lol.
BUT, I am never logging back on FR as Polarik again.That's a promise I will keep.
Now, let's speculate a bit. If I don't misremember, you turned up in the wake of Phil Berg and his manic stuff.
It's fairly clear that Berg is a Hillary pod. One may wonder if it is altogether a coinkydink that you have geared up to a more or less frantic activity-level just at this time, when Hilly is starting to make her move. And you are parasitizing FR as a platform for pure crackpottery, neatly doing double duty of taking down a conservative forum and promoting the Berg/Hillary cause.
I have had a few FReepers ask me some good questions about the Obama COLB border, vis-a-vis, the one I demonstrate how to make.
I thought that the group should know them, too.
The first thing I said to them was, “If you are looking for logical reasons as to why the forger did what he did, there are none - beyond simply the desire to make a one-off that would surely piss off people like me.
Of all the initially wrong assumptions that I, and other “Sluethers,” made about Obama’s COLB, was to start off with “Ecclesiastes,” as in, “To everything, there is a reason.”
In the case of Obama’s COLB, we thought that every part of it had a reason for being there. Not true.
However, two facts stand out - and I did mention them in the video.
One, that the forger needed to obscure the security paper pattern that could be seen in a real border, and Two, the forger made the border semi-transparent because that is how the security paper pattern is seen below the border.
Back in mid-November 2008, I posted a real 2007 COLB border in which I had found the right mix of coloring, sharpening, and contrast to match that of Obama’s 2007 border.
However, to my chagrin, the alterations I made to the real 2007 border enhanced the security paper pattern that was still visible.
Why was that a problem?
If you enlarge the Obama COLB and look closely at its border, you can see the pattern of the security paper through it. You know that you are looking at security paper because the dark green patterns of the paper are not interrupted by the border.
They patterns run continuously across the face of the COLB, from the left edge of the paper to right edge and from top edge to the bottom edge - but are not perpendicular to the paper! (Chapter One, Part 4).
In other words, the borders on Obama’s COLB are semi-transparent while on the real 2007 COLB, they were close to being opaque.
One of the “security features” of the actual border used in 2007 (as well as in 2006 and 2009) is a very fine mesh through which the security paper can be seen.
It also can be seen on very high resolution scans and photographs - like that 2009 COLB I made - but not perfectly.
Normally, a scan or Xerox copy of a real COLB will cause that mesh to blur and obscure the background pattern of the security paper.
What made the Obama border such a bitch to replicate was the way in which it was repeatedly blurred and sharpened, and then made transparent enough to actually see the “security paper background” through it.
Keep in mind that Obama’s COLB (and my replicate) is a composite of four main layers: the first is an image of security paper; the second is the text layer including the certificate Masthead; the third is the border, and the fourth and last layer contains the “certification stamps” including the Seal, date-stamp, and Registrar’s stamp - which should be as visible as the date stamp, but is not even close (and why I left it off for now. Putting it on, though, is easier than doing the date stamp because the bottom of the border obscures most of it).
The reason for making the date-stamp so visible is to convey a sense of authenticity to the “document.”
Getting back to the problem, I realized that I had to make the border layer semi-transparent, WITHOUT changing the solid black information boxes at the top and bottom. Had they stayed a part of the border, they would have been incorrectly made to be semi-transparent.
Alas, I’m not done yet.
The other kicker about the Obama border is how did the forger keep the lettering in those black boxes sharp and nearly white in appearance.
My first thought was that he typed over an all-black rectangle with a white font. That was not right because in real borders, you can also see the security paper patterns through the text of the boxes like a stencil.
I decided that the text in those boxes were, in fact, transparent , but what initially threw me off the idea was clearing out the existing letters by highlighting them directly.
It made the openings in the letters too wide and too thick.
The solution was to expand the selection by a single pixel after inverting it.
That’s about all I’ll say about the border. I’m concentrating on finishing the book.
Kudos to you RON!( Bowing at your feet, while watching the caterwauling Obots gather at the back of the room.)
I feel like an idiot for sitting through that video. What a waste of time.
A steady diet...
King of Kenya’s BC.