Let’s suppose that there was an authorized registrar at the hospital. She likely would have been a head nurse or someone like that. It’s likely that she would have been the one to stamp the date filed because it seems to coinside with the date the doctor signed the certificate. Her signature wouldn’t be enough even in 1961. She would have needed to reflect a date somewhere.
Then let’s suppose that her weekly stack of certificates are sent to the state for verification and certificate number assignment. The clerk at the state registrar’s office receives a pile of paperwork with the 8th on the bottom and the 11th on the top because that’s how the hospital stacked it in their outgoing tray. The clerk approves and stamps the certificate number on each paper working from the top down in the stack.
Do you see what I’m getting at? There are multiple plausible explanations for why those dates and numbers don’t match up in your mind. That’s not to say that your theory is totally wrong or disproven. I just want you to consider that there could be other explanations before you jump off the bridge screaming that you’ve proven the COLB a forgery.
The dates that differ are the dates the CERTIFICATE NUMBER was given, not the date of birth.
The local registrar at Kapiolani signed all of the certs on the same day - Friday. He/she sent them to the DOH where they were given numbers on the same day - Friday.
You could have the numbers out of sequence from the date of birth. Absolutely.
But the problem is the day that the certificate was filed at the state registrar’s office. The certs from Kapiolani for the week were all filed on the same day. They all received numbers on the same day.
Why would a clerk 3 days later use a lower number than was used for the batch of birth certificates 3 days earlier?
That's Stupid. The controlling office of those birth certificate forms would not send them out with pre-stamped control numbers or let multiple nurses from a multitude of facilities do that. It's too much of a chance for things to go wrong like double numbers or as them being lost in transit or being incomplete and having to send the form back to and from the medical facilities. What does make sense, and that has been verified here, is to issue the control numbers when the birth certificates are filed or accepted by the state to be placed in the records at that time.
Buckeye, you gotta be kidding:
“suppose; likely; someone like that; seems; let’s suppose”
LOL!
Mu God, how desperate are you? That settles it, you are officially an Obot. end of story. You voted for Hillary, she lost then you voted for BO.
You are doing alot of “let’s supposes”. WHy do you give a sh*t about this to spend every waking hour worried about what the crazy ‘birfers’ say? Since some on your ping list are RATS, that might help explain it.