Posted on 01/28/2010 5:18:04 AM PST by iloveamerica1980
BHO'S KENYAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE ! ! SEE FOR YOURSELF ! ! Right before my eyes, there it is, Barack HUSSEIN Obama's birth certificate, mmm mmmm mmmm
Pride getting your way isn’t it?
Dont take it out on everyone. Where’s your integrity?
Maybe you should check out the definition of what a witness in federal court (or any court) is.
I’ve filed declarations and affidavits in federal court, I’ve been in the courtrooms waiting to take the stand and I did take the stand in the Rivernider case.
And for the record, BARNETT vs OBAMA is the very first Obama case that I was witness in.
I have an idea here, why don’t you get a law degree and then come back here to freerepublic and post an agology for all the errors you’ve made in your posts today.
I know your type, I’ve run across many in the last several months. You run your mouth on and on and on. When someone finally calls you out for your bs you then take the, “It’s my story and I’m sticking to it.”
I’ve called out scores of you old halfrate losers. Where’s your intergrity? When you’re wrong you are wrong.
I wouldn’t be at shocked if you are some middle aged guy sitting all alone in disabilty paid apartment. That’s what happens to most know-it-alls. You know why??? Because noone likes them. That’s why you probably don’t have a wife and never did and never will.
Best advise to you and those like you is to sign up for Obama’s utopia brave new world. You guys will fit right in.
Don’t worry about replying to me. I dont have time to read ocmments from “know it alls”. You’d find a reason to argue no matter what anyone said.
Respectfully,
Lucas D. Smith
What was your motivation to hook up with the Dentist in the first place???
And one last note to the old limp di-k - no wife - know-it-all browardchad.
My 09.03.2009 declartion and the birth certificate of Obama was filed in the BARNETT vs OBAMA case. It was filed in 09.03.2009 or 09.04.2010.
Recorded in the Rhodes case as well (as you agree with).
The Rhodes case too was all about Obama being ineligible to hold office of President of the US of A. (I see that you failed to man up to the fact that you made an error when claiming that the Rhodes case has nothing to do with Obama)
My declaration and the Obama birth certificate is filed in BOTH cases. But yet you claim I wasn’t a witness in the case??? Are you off your rocker or what? Opps... I forgot, you’re just an old limp di-ck know-it-all.
Old loser. Find some intergrity.
Hi danamco,
At the time I was looking for attorney to help me bring the Obama birth certificate before the federal courts.
Orly offered to represent me.
It wasn’t easy finding an attorney. Not many attorneys are willing to risk a lucrative career in law to challenge Obama.
It’s sort of like going “all in” in a poker game. If the attorney loses they also forfeit their reputation. “oh, that’s the crazy birther attorney that challenged Obama.”
I will state here again that I have cut ties with Orly after just two weeks of working with her (in the month of September). She is anything but a Patriot.
Thank you for your question.
Lucas D. Smith
Thanks for the explanation, I am not surprised.
No, Lucas, you weren't a witness.
Actually, you should be grateful for that, since witnessing falsely can lead to perjury charges, whereas filing of a silly affidavit and a fictitious document have taken a back seat to Taitz' and Lincoln's spectacularly moronic antics.
But, if you continue to insist that you were a "witness," please do furnish us with the transcript copy of your witnessing in Barnett v. Obama. We await breathlessly.
And while we await, here's the link to the Rhodes v. MacDonald 9/14/09 hearing transcript, which I assume you'd obviously prefer to overlook, but which is really the first exposure of your affidavit and Kenyan BC to a U.S. Federal Court, with very unsatisfactory results.
There is however some really good stuff on the web.
I just came across this link and the info is supplied “suposedly” by a practicing psycho-therapist who does a rather good job of making a very telling case againsst ozero. It’s here.
http://www.thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/04/aka-obama-fans-all-together-now-say-omg.html
Smith’s BC was not "proved up" as evidence in federal court, but his affidavit regarding Taitz has been deemed sufficiently reliable by Judge Carter for him to refer to it in his ruling.
Your transcript between Judge Carter and Taitz only shows that Taitz did not understand the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) on foreign document authentication, and that does reflect badly on Smith or his CPGH BC at all.
In your transcript, Judge Carter was getting on the record that Smith's affidavit declaring that he paid a bribe to obtain the CPGH BC was not sufficient to satisfy the FRE which requires authentication by Kenyan authorities.
Judge Carter, in your transcript, gets Taitz to impeach herself as an incompetent lawyer but does not impeach Lucas Smith as an unreliable witness or fraudster.
In his ruling, Carter refers explicitly to Smith's affidavit and gives every appearance of finding the affidavit to be credible when he said he was "concerned that Taitz may have suborned perjury":
"Additionally, the Court as received several sworn affidavits that Taitz asked potential witnesses that she planned to call before this Court to perjure themselves. This Court is deeply concerned that Taitz may have suborned perjury through witnesses she intended to bring before this Court."
Judge Carter would have been completely derelict if he hadn't researched the felony background of both Smith and Sinclair whose affidavits he referred to in making these scathing accusatory suspicions of felony on Taitz's part on the record!
Judges listen to testimony from felons every day and become confident that by instinct they can assess the credibility of witness testimony in full context, whether in-person or by affidavit.
Lucas Smith found out quickly that Taitz didn't know the kind of authentication that was required under the FRE and has never claimed that his CPGH BC would be admissible in federal court without additional authentication.
One might ask you the same.
First, yes, there are many repeat offenders in prison but, I don’t think you’ll find many (if any) individuals in the world bring litigation to federal court (as opposed to them themselves being hulled into court) and giving FALSE testimony on their own free will.
Why not if he thinks he can get away with it? Or if he thinks he's honestly got the real birth certificate?
Oh and by the way, Obama’s team of czars (and other people he has brought in as his staff) they just have such clean backgrounds don’t they??? Give me a break, Obama’s has brought all sorts of dubious characters onto his team.
Think of all the fun you'll have picking their backgrounds apart?
Maybe you should run a thread here on Freerepublic about the ex-cons and ex-terrorists that now have jobs in the federal government now thanks to President Obama.
Why steal your thunder? How about listing them for us?
Can you handle that? Or are you just an Obot that is paid to discredit Lucas Smith at all costs?
No I just find Birthers to be a whole big ball of fun.
NOt yet,but I have hope.
So? What percentage of criminals got started at an early age?
The frontal lobe of the male of the species is immature at that age (prior to age 25, look at the insurance tables) and often unable to properly assess risk and personal responsibility.
So he was not a criminal but a misunderstood youth who made some foolish mistakes, is that it?
It is not clear to me how Smith would personally benefit from going public in denouncing Taitz and I suspect that, in similar circumstances most folks would have just kept quiet and removed themselves from dealings with Taitz.
Maybe he's going to try and peddle the document on eBay? Again?
Convicted felons give testimony in federal court all the time and are found to be credible on a case by case basis.
Or not.
Thank you!
They fight it with nails and tooth NOT to touch this issue with a ten-foot pole. They will block you e-mail access to their website when you confront them. Tells me all I need to know why!!!
LOL LOL!!! What a perfect description!
That’s why you probably don’t have a wife and never did and never will.
____________
he’s gay
The Woodward/Bernstein looks-a-likes went after Sarah Palin and her family big time, but they are tone deaf to Barry Soetoro!!
Maybe the B.C. shows a total different father, he don't want us to see, or other info how they were able to game the system. 39 different S.S.#s comes to mind!!!
It may be old stuff but the link at post # 107 I made earlier really got my attention. Check it out if you haven’t
Part of their job is abiding by and enforcing the Federal Rules of Evidence, in which Rule 901 requires "authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims."
Why can't Orly or Smith provide support that their document is authentic, hmmm?
This could be why zero has spent loads of dough to keep documentation about his education and birth secret.
And you appeared on the stand when? In which case?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.